Refining a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Infant Sepsis: A Multidisciplinary Team Supported by Human-Centered Design Methods.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1055/a-2618-4470
Dean Karavite, Lusha Cao, Mary C Harris, Alex Fidel, Lyle Ungar, Gerald Shaeffer, Rui Xiao, Patrick Brady, Heather C Kaplan, Robert W Grundmeier
{"title":"Refining a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Infant Sepsis: A Multidisciplinary Team Supported by Human-Centered Design Methods.","authors":"Dean Karavite, Lusha Cao, Mary C Harris, Alex Fidel, Lyle Ungar, Gerald Shaeffer, Rui Xiao, Patrick Brady, Heather C Kaplan, Robert W Grundmeier","doi":"10.1055/a-2618-4470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human-centered design (HCD) methods in machine learning generally focus on workflow, user interfaces, and data visualizations, but there is the potential to apply these methods to inform the model development and testing process.This study aimed to demonstrate the potential of HCD methods to support the design and testing of machine learning models developed for clinical decision-making.In preparing for formative user testing of clinician facing representations of a machine learning model for detecting sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients, we discovered that interactive low fidelity mockups using real patient data revealed potential model anomalies. To further investigate these potential anomalies, we utilized the qualitative analysis of interviews with 31 NICU clinicians concerning their experience with neonatal sepsis. The review process was conducted by a multidisciplinary team with members having expertise in neonatology, informatics, data science, and human computer interaction (HCI). Anomalies identified via the mockups and interview analysis were further analyzed by inspections of patient charts and model features and code.The HCD-facilitated review revealed anomalies in three categories: (1) feature inclusion and exclusion, (2) feature importance, and (3) model stability over time. Data entry errors in the electronic health record and their impact on model output were also noted. The review resulted in 41 changes to the model.The discovery of over 41 opportunities to improve our prediction model was a serendipitous by-product of the HCD process. Our results suggest that HCD can be applied not only to model display design and measures of explainability, but to the development and evaluation of the model itself. This case report also demonstrates the need for a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, data scientists, and HCI experts in identifying and addressing issues involving machine learning model performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"1332-1340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2618-4470","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-centered design (HCD) methods in machine learning generally focus on workflow, user interfaces, and data visualizations, but there is the potential to apply these methods to inform the model development and testing process.This study aimed to demonstrate the potential of HCD methods to support the design and testing of machine learning models developed for clinical decision-making.In preparing for formative user testing of clinician facing representations of a machine learning model for detecting sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients, we discovered that interactive low fidelity mockups using real patient data revealed potential model anomalies. To further investigate these potential anomalies, we utilized the qualitative analysis of interviews with 31 NICU clinicians concerning their experience with neonatal sepsis. The review process was conducted by a multidisciplinary team with members having expertise in neonatology, informatics, data science, and human computer interaction (HCI). Anomalies identified via the mockups and interview analysis were further analyzed by inspections of patient charts and model features and code.The HCD-facilitated review revealed anomalies in three categories: (1) feature inclusion and exclusion, (2) feature importance, and (3) model stability over time. Data entry errors in the electronic health record and their impact on model output were also noted. The review resulted in 41 changes to the model.The discovery of over 41 opportunities to improve our prediction model was a serendipitous by-product of the HCD process. Our results suggest that HCD can be applied not only to model display design and measures of explainability, but to the development and evaluation of the model itself. This case report also demonstrates the need for a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, data scientists, and HCI experts in identifying and addressing issues involving machine learning model performance.

改进预测婴儿败血症的机器学习模型:由以人为中心的设计方法支持的多学科团队。
机器学习中的以人为中心的设计(HCD)方法通常侧重于工作流、用户界面和数据可视化,但也有可能将这些方法应用于模型开发和测试过程。本研究旨在证明HCD方法的潜力,以支持为临床决策开发的机器学习模型的设计和测试。在准备临床医生面对用于检测新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)患者败血症的机器学习模型的表示进行形成性用户测试时,我们发现使用真实患者数据的交互式低保真模型揭示了潜在的模型异常。为了进一步研究这些潜在的异常,我们对31名新生儿重症监护病房的临床医生进行了定性分析,了解他们处理新生儿败血症的经验。审查过程由一个多学科小组进行,其成员具有新生儿学、信息学、数据科学和人机交互(HCI)方面的专业知识。通过模型和访谈分析发现的异常,通过检查患者图表、模型特征和代码进一步分析。hcd辅助审查揭示了三个类别的异常:(1)特征包含和排除,(2)特征重要性,(3)模型随时间的稳定性。还注意到电子健康记录中的数据输入错误及其对模型输出的影响。审查对模型进行了41处修改。我们发现了超过41个改进预测模型的机会,这是HCD过程的偶然副产品。我们的研究结果表明,HCD不仅可以应用于模型展示设计和可解释性测量,还可以应用于模型本身的开发和评估。该案例报告还表明,需要一个由临床医生、数据科学家和HCI专家组成的多学科团队来识别和解决涉及机器学习模型性能的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信