[Comparison of the influence of decentration and tilt of two types of trifocal intraocular lenses on objective visual quality].

Q3 Medicine
R Qin, Y Y Liu, Z K Li, D H Liu, T Sun, Q Q Lan, H Qi
{"title":"[Comparison of the influence of decentration and tilt of two types of trifocal intraocular lenses on objective visual quality].","authors":"R Qin, Y Y Liu, Z K Li, D H Liu, T Sun, Q Q Lan, H Qi","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20250205-00053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the differences in decentration and tilt between two types of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and their impacts on postoperative objective visual quality. <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective cohort study. One eye was consecutively enrolled from each cataract patient who underwent bilateral phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with IOL implantation at Peking University Third Hospital between January 2023 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of implanted IOL: the 839MP group (AT LISA tri 839MP IOL) and the Panoptix group (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL). At 3 months postoperatively, the following parameters were compared between the two groups: uncorrected distance, intermediate (80 and 60 cm), and near visual acuities; best-corrected distance visual acuity; spherical equivalent refraction; IOL decentration distance and tilt angle. Additionally, total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), coma, trefoil, spherical aberration of the whole eye and intraocular, and modulation transfer function (MTF) were measured, and the severity of adverse visual phenomena was graded. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between IOL decentration/tilt and total HOAs of the whole eye. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values of IOL decentration and tilt for predicting total HOAs of the whole eye >0.3 μm and >0.5 μm, with the area under the curve (AUC) used to evaluate predictive efficacy. <b>Results:</b> Forty-five patients (45 eyes) were recruited in each group, and 42 patients (42 eyes) in each group completed the follow-up, with a total of 84 patients (84 eyes). Among them, there were 28 males and 56 females, with a mean age of 65 years. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of gender, age, eye laterality, axial length category, IOL power, preoperative lens decentration and tilt, Kappa angle, or Alpha angle (all <i>P</i>>0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the 839MP and Panoptix groups in uncorrected distance, intermediate (80 cm), and near visual acuities or best-corrected distance visual acuity (all <i>P</i>>0.05). However, for uncorrected intermediate visual acuity at 60 cm, the Panoptix group performed better than the 839MP group (<i>P</i><0.001). Regarding IOL decentration, the total decentration distance and vertical decentration distance in the 839MP group were (0.27±0.16) mm and (0.17±0.11) mm, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the Panoptix group [(0.44±0.26) mm and (0.35±0.28) mm, respectively; all <i>P</i><0.05]. For IOL tilt, no significant difference was found in the total tilt angle between the 839MP group (3.83°±2.15°) and the Panoptix group (3.08°±1.70°) (<i>P</i>>0.05). In terms of objective visual quality, the total HOAs of the whole eye, ocular HOAs, and total intraocular HOAs in the 839MP group were (0.222±0.094) μm, (0.099±0.071) μm, and (0.195±0.094) μm, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the Panoptix group [(0.324±0.243) μm, (0.168±0.166) μm, and (0.304±0.240) μm, respectively; all <i>P</i><0.05]. No correlation was observed between IOL tilt/decentration and intraocular HOAs in either group (<i>P</i>>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that for evaluating IOL tolerance to decentration and tilt: when total HOAs of the whole eye>0.3 μm, the cut-off values of IOL decentration and tilt were 0.29 mm (AUC=0.69) and 5.1° (AUC=0.79) in the 839MP group, and 0.33 mm (AUC=0.76) and 3.2° (AUC=0.81) in the Panoptix group; when total HOAs of the whole eye>0.5 μm, the cut-off values of IOL decentration and tilt were 0.54 mm (AUC=0.64) and 6.9° (AUC=0.85) in the 839MP group, and 0.61 mm (AUC=0.72) and 4.7° (AUC=0.88) in the Panoptix group. No significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse visual phenomena between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> In the early postoperative period after trifocal IOL implantation, compared with the Panoptix IOL, the 839MP IOL exhibits smaller decentration and better objective visual quality. Furthermore, at the same tilt level, the 839MP IOL provides better objective visual quality; whereas at the same decentration level, the Panoptix IOL shows superior objective visual quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":39688,"journal":{"name":"中华眼科杂志","volume":"61 10","pages":"791-798"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20250205-00053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the differences in decentration and tilt between two types of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and their impacts on postoperative objective visual quality. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. One eye was consecutively enrolled from each cataract patient who underwent bilateral phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with IOL implantation at Peking University Third Hospital between January 2023 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of implanted IOL: the 839MP group (AT LISA tri 839MP IOL) and the Panoptix group (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL). At 3 months postoperatively, the following parameters were compared between the two groups: uncorrected distance, intermediate (80 and 60 cm), and near visual acuities; best-corrected distance visual acuity; spherical equivalent refraction; IOL decentration distance and tilt angle. Additionally, total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), coma, trefoil, spherical aberration of the whole eye and intraocular, and modulation transfer function (MTF) were measured, and the severity of adverse visual phenomena was graded. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between IOL decentration/tilt and total HOAs of the whole eye. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values of IOL decentration and tilt for predicting total HOAs of the whole eye >0.3 μm and >0.5 μm, with the area under the curve (AUC) used to evaluate predictive efficacy. Results: Forty-five patients (45 eyes) were recruited in each group, and 42 patients (42 eyes) in each group completed the follow-up, with a total of 84 patients (84 eyes). Among them, there were 28 males and 56 females, with a mean age of 65 years. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of gender, age, eye laterality, axial length category, IOL power, preoperative lens decentration and tilt, Kappa angle, or Alpha angle (all P>0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the 839MP and Panoptix groups in uncorrected distance, intermediate (80 cm), and near visual acuities or best-corrected distance visual acuity (all P>0.05). However, for uncorrected intermediate visual acuity at 60 cm, the Panoptix group performed better than the 839MP group (P<0.001). Regarding IOL decentration, the total decentration distance and vertical decentration distance in the 839MP group were (0.27±0.16) mm and (0.17±0.11) mm, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the Panoptix group [(0.44±0.26) mm and (0.35±0.28) mm, respectively; all P<0.05]. For IOL tilt, no significant difference was found in the total tilt angle between the 839MP group (3.83°±2.15°) and the Panoptix group (3.08°±1.70°) (P>0.05). In terms of objective visual quality, the total HOAs of the whole eye, ocular HOAs, and total intraocular HOAs in the 839MP group were (0.222±0.094) μm, (0.099±0.071) μm, and (0.195±0.094) μm, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the Panoptix group [(0.324±0.243) μm, (0.168±0.166) μm, and (0.304±0.240) μm, respectively; all P<0.05]. No correlation was observed between IOL tilt/decentration and intraocular HOAs in either group (P>0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that for evaluating IOL tolerance to decentration and tilt: when total HOAs of the whole eye>0.3 μm, the cut-off values of IOL decentration and tilt were 0.29 mm (AUC=0.69) and 5.1° (AUC=0.79) in the 839MP group, and 0.33 mm (AUC=0.76) and 3.2° (AUC=0.81) in the Panoptix group; when total HOAs of the whole eye>0.5 μm, the cut-off values of IOL decentration and tilt were 0.54 mm (AUC=0.64) and 6.9° (AUC=0.85) in the 839MP group, and 0.61 mm (AUC=0.72) and 4.7° (AUC=0.88) in the Panoptix group. No significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse visual phenomena between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: In the early postoperative period after trifocal IOL implantation, compared with the Panoptix IOL, the 839MP IOL exhibits smaller decentration and better objective visual quality. Furthermore, at the same tilt level, the 839MP IOL provides better objective visual quality; whereas at the same decentration level, the Panoptix IOL shows superior objective visual quality.

[两种三焦人工晶状体离体和倾斜对客观视觉质量影响的比较]。
目的:比较两种三焦人工晶状体(IOL)离体和倾斜的差异及其对术后客观视觉质量的影响。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究。于2023年1月至2024年6月在北京大学第三医院行双侧超声乳化白内障摘出联合人工晶状体植入术的白内障患者,每例患者连续入组1眼。根据人工晶状体类型将患者分为839MP组(AT LISA tri 839MP IOL)和Panoptix组(AcrySof IQ Panoptix IOL)。术后3个月,比较两组的以下参数:未矫正距离、中等(80 cm和60 cm)和近视力;最佳矫正距离视力;球面等效折射;人工晶状体离体距离和倾斜角度。测量全眼和眼内总高阶像差(HOAs)、彗差、三叶草差、球差和调制传递函数(MTF),并对不良视觉现象的严重程度进行分级。采用Pearson相关分析探讨人工晶状体离体/倾斜与全眼总hoa的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定预测全眼总hoa (>0.3 μm和>0.5 μm)的IOL离体和倾斜截断值,以曲线下面积(AUC)评价预测效果。结果:每组共招募患者45例(45眼),每组42例(42眼)完成随访,共84例(84眼)。其中男性28例,女性56例,平均年龄65岁。两组患者在性别、年龄、眼侧度、眼轴长度类别、人工晶状体度数、术前晶状体离体及倾斜、Kappa角、Alpha角等方面差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后3个月,839MP组与Panoptix组在未矫正距离、中矫正距离(80 cm)、近矫正距离和最佳矫正距离视力方面差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。但对于60 cm处未矫正的中间视力,Panoptix组优于839MP组(PPP 0.05)。在物镜视觉质量方面,839MP组全眼总hoa、眼部总hoa和眼内总hoa分别为(0.222±0.094)μm、(0.099±0.071)μm和(0.195±0.094)μm,均显著低于Panoptix组[(0.324±0.243)μm、(0.168±0.166)μm和(0.304±0.240)μm];所有页> 0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,评价IOL对偏心和倾斜的耐受性:当全眼总hoa >0.3 μm时,839MP组IOL偏心和倾斜的临界值分别为0.29 mm (AUC=0.69)和5.1°(AUC=0.79), Panoptix组IOL偏心和倾斜的临界值分别为0.33 mm (AUC=0.76)和3.2°(AUC=0.81);当全眼总hoa小于0.5 μm时,839MP组IOL离体和倾斜的截点值分别为0.54 mm (AUC=0.64)和6.9°(AUC=0.85), Panoptix组为0.61 mm (AUC=0.72)和4.7°(AUC=0.88)。两组患者视觉不良现象发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:与Panoptix人工晶状体相比,839MP人工晶状体术后早期离体较小,物镜视觉质量较好。此外,在相同的倾斜水平下,839MP人工晶状体提供更好的客观视觉质量;而在相同的离体水平下,Panoptix人工晶状体的物镜视觉质量更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华眼科杂志
中华眼科杂志 Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12700
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信