Vaccination Rates Among Long-Term Care Staff During the SARS-COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Linette N Leng, Cassandra L Hua, David M Dosa, Debra Dobbs, Lindsay J Peterson
{"title":"Vaccination Rates Among Long-Term Care Staff During the SARS-COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Linette N Leng, Cassandra L Hua, David M Dosa, Debra Dobbs, Lindsay J Peterson","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on long-term care facilities, particularly nursing homes and assisted living communities (ALCs), leading to high mortality rates among residents. Vaccination of residents and staff in long-term care mitigated virus spread. However, we know little about vaccine uptake in assisted living compared with the nursing home setting. The purpose of this paper was to compare assisted living staff vaccination rates with similarly collected data on nursing homes soon after the vaccines became available, and to elucidate organizational factors that may have influenced assisted living staff vaccination.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study using data collected by the State of Florida through its emergency reporting system.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Florida nursing homes and ALCs that provided data to the state on total numbers of staff who received 2 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine by February 8, 2021 (n = 2585), and February 15, 2021 (n = 2731).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared vaccination rates for nursing homes and ALCs during 2 time points a week apart. It used logistic regression models to understand the organizational factors (eg, size, rurality, ownership status) associated with vaccination rates in assisted living, given the lack of knowledge on this setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALCs, particularly smaller communities, had lower initial vaccination rates, but vaccination rates in the smaller communities (<25 beds) increased significantly by February 15, 2025. Organizational factors such as for-profit status and rural location were identified as significant predictors of vaccination, with higher rates among smaller, urban ALCs that accept state supplemental funding and lower rates among larger, for-profit ALCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This study suggests that planning for future pandemics and emergency response in assisted living should include preparedness strategies that consider long-term care organizational barriers and facilitators, including size, location, and profit status.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on long-term care facilities, particularly nursing homes and assisted living communities (ALCs), leading to high mortality rates among residents. Vaccination of residents and staff in long-term care mitigated virus spread. However, we know little about vaccine uptake in assisted living compared with the nursing home setting. The purpose of this paper was to compare assisted living staff vaccination rates with similarly collected data on nursing homes soon after the vaccines became available, and to elucidate organizational factors that may have influenced assisted living staff vaccination.

Design: Cross-sectional study using data collected by the State of Florida through its emergency reporting system.

Setting and participants: Florida nursing homes and ALCs that provided data to the state on total numbers of staff who received 2 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine by February 8, 2021 (n = 2585), and February 15, 2021 (n = 2731).

Methods: The study compared vaccination rates for nursing homes and ALCs during 2 time points a week apart. It used logistic regression models to understand the organizational factors (eg, size, rurality, ownership status) associated with vaccination rates in assisted living, given the lack of knowledge on this setting.

Results: ALCs, particularly smaller communities, had lower initial vaccination rates, but vaccination rates in the smaller communities (<25 beds) increased significantly by February 15, 2025. Organizational factors such as for-profit status and rural location were identified as significant predictors of vaccination, with higher rates among smaller, urban ALCs that accept state supplemental funding and lower rates among larger, for-profit ALCs.

Conclusions and implications: This study suggests that planning for future pandemics and emergency response in assisted living should include preparedness strategies that consider long-term care organizational barriers and facilitators, including size, location, and profit status.

SARS-COVID-19大流行期间长期护理人员的疫苗接种率
目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行对长期护理机构,特别是养老院和辅助生活社区(ALCs)产生了深远影响,导致居民死亡率居高不下。长期护理的居民和工作人员接种疫苗减轻了病毒的传播。然而,与养老院环境相比,我们对辅助生活中的疫苗摄取知之甚少。本文的目的是将辅助生活人员的疫苗接种率与养老院在疫苗可用后不久收集的类似数据进行比较,并阐明可能影响辅助生活人员疫苗接种的组织因素。设计:横断面研究使用由佛罗里达州通过其紧急报告系统收集的数据。环境和参与者:佛罗里达州的养老院和alc向该州提供了在2021年2月8日(n = 2585)和2021年2月15日(n = 2731)之前接种两剂COVID-19疫苗的工作人员总数的数据。方法:研究比较养老院和ALCs隔一周2个时间点的疫苗接种率。考虑到缺乏这方面的知识,它使用逻辑回归模型来了解与辅助生活中疫苗接种率相关的组织因素(例如,规模、农村性、所有权状况)。结果:ALCs,特别是较小的社区,具有较低的初始疫苗接种率,但较小社区的疫苗接种率(结论和含义:本研究表明,在辅助生活中规划未来的流行病和应急响应应包括考虑长期护理组织障碍和促进因素的准备策略,包括规模、位置和利润状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信