Exploring Safety Concerns in Assisted Living Communities: A Qualitative Comparison of Resident, Family, and Staff Perspectives.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Youngmin Cho, Victoria Crowder, Cassandra Dictus, Cloie J Chiong, Wenxin Bian, Jing Wang, Matthias Hoben, Stephanie Chamberlain, Ruth A Anderson, Amy Vogelsmeier, Schwartz Lindsay, Marianne Baernholdt, Dardess Pam, Stephanie Miller, Baiming Zou, Anna S Beeber
{"title":"Exploring Safety Concerns in Assisted Living Communities: A Qualitative Comparison of Resident, Family, and Staff Perspectives.","authors":"Youngmin Cho, Victoria Crowder, Cassandra Dictus, Cloie J Chiong, Wenxin Bian, Jing Wang, Matthias Hoben, Stephanie Chamberlain, Ruth A Anderson, Amy Vogelsmeier, Schwartz Lindsay, Marianne Baernholdt, Dardess Pam, Stephanie Miller, Baiming Zou, Anna S Beeber","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Safety concerns in assisted living (AL) communities are critical, yet understudied from the perspectives of residents, family caregivers, and staff. This study aimed to explore and compare safety concerns across these 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This qualitative study conducted structured interviews to identify safety concerns from the perspectives of residents, family caregivers, and staff.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Data were collected from 104 participants in AL communities across the United States, comprising 32 residents, 34 family caregivers, and 38 staff members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted summative content analysis of interview transcripts, identifying distinct safety concerns and comparing the commonality and discrepancies in safety concerns across the 3 participant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 29 safety concerns in AL communities. For the top common safety concern, resident condition-related falls were the most frequently reported concern across all groups. Regarding the discrepancies among the 3 groups, resident and/or family groups expressed concerns about prompt use of assistive devices and technology, communication/relationships, and self-care/independence, whereas staff frequently reported concern with environmental issues causing falls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Safety concerns in AL communities are multifaceted and shared across residents, family caregivers, and staff, with falls and unmet care needs being primary concerns. However, differences identified in this study suggest the need for tailored interventions that address the unique concerns of each group. Improving communication among staff, residents, and families may reduce safety concern mismatches and potentially contribute to a safer AL environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105910"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Safety concerns in assisted living (AL) communities are critical, yet understudied from the perspectives of residents, family caregivers, and staff. This study aimed to explore and compare safety concerns across these 3 groups.

Design: This qualitative study conducted structured interviews to identify safety concerns from the perspectives of residents, family caregivers, and staff.

Setting and participants: Data were collected from 104 participants in AL communities across the United States, comprising 32 residents, 34 family caregivers, and 38 staff members.

Methods: We conducted summative content analysis of interview transcripts, identifying distinct safety concerns and comparing the commonality and discrepancies in safety concerns across the 3 participant groups.

Results: We identified 29 safety concerns in AL communities. For the top common safety concern, resident condition-related falls were the most frequently reported concern across all groups. Regarding the discrepancies among the 3 groups, resident and/or family groups expressed concerns about prompt use of assistive devices and technology, communication/relationships, and self-care/independence, whereas staff frequently reported concern with environmental issues causing falls.

Conclusions and implications: Safety concerns in AL communities are multifaceted and shared across residents, family caregivers, and staff, with falls and unmet care needs being primary concerns. However, differences identified in this study suggest the need for tailored interventions that address the unique concerns of each group. Improving communication among staff, residents, and families may reduce safety concern mismatches and potentially contribute to a safer AL environment.

探索辅助生活社区的安全问题:居民、家庭和工作人员观点的定性比较。
目的:辅助生活(AL)社区的安全问题是至关重要的,但从居民、家庭照顾者和工作人员的角度来看,安全问题还没有得到充分的研究。本研究旨在探讨和比较这三组的安全性问题。设计:本定性研究进行了结构化访谈,从居民、家庭照顾者和工作人员的角度确定安全问题。环境和参与者:从美国AL社区的104名参与者中收集数据,包括32名居民,34名家庭护理人员和38名工作人员。方法:我们对访谈记录进行了总结性内容分析,确定了不同的安全问题,并比较了三个参与者组在安全问题上的共同点和差异。结果:我们在AL社区确定了29个安全问题。对于最常见的安全问题,与居住条件有关的跌倒是所有群体中最常报告的问题。至于三个组别之间的差异,住院及/或家庭组别表示关注即时使用辅助装置及科技、沟通/人际关系及自我照顾/独立,而工作人员则经常反映关注导致跌倒的环境问题。结论和意义:AL社区的安全问题是多方面的,在居民、家庭照顾者和工作人员中是共同的,跌倒和未满足的护理需求是主要问题。然而,本研究中发现的差异表明,需要针对每个群体的独特问题进行量身定制的干预。改善工作人员、住院医师和家属之间的沟通可以减少安全问题的不匹配,并可能有助于建立更安全的人工智能环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信