Right-Sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Characterization, Utility of Prenatal Imaging Predictors and Outcomes.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Caitlin R Eason, Catherine Dawson-Gore, Spencer Butted, Blair W Weikel, Alyssa E Vaughn, Michael Zaretsky, Mariana L Meyers, Jason Gien, Kenneth W Liechty, S Christopher Derderian
{"title":"Right-Sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Characterization, Utility of Prenatal Imaging Predictors and Outcomes.","authors":"Caitlin R Eason, Catherine Dawson-Gore, Spencer Butted, Blair W Weikel, Alyssa E Vaughn, Michael Zaretsky, Mariana L Meyers, Jason Gien, Kenneth W Liechty, S Christopher Derderian","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identify the most accurate prenatal predictor of survival for infants with right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (R-CDH), analyze management strategies and outcomes and evaluate differences in outcomes based on surgical repair techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of infants diagnosed with R-CDH at a single institution from 2010-2024. Prenatal ultrasound and MRI values were analyzed to predict survival as well as secondary outcomes including need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), duration on mechanical ventilation, length of hospitalization (LOH), and severity of pulmonary hypertension. Outcomes between repair techniques were compared in a subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two infants with R-CDH met inclusion criteria. Overall survival to discharge was 75%. Seventeen (53%) had prenatal imaging and were diagnosed prenatally. Among ultrasound and MRI prenatal predicitive indices, no thresholds to accurately distinguish survivors from non-survivors were identified. All but one infant diagnosed prenatally required ECMO. Nine (28%) underwent primary repair, nine (28%) were repaired with a synthetic patch, and 14 (44%) with a transversus abdominus muscle flap. Infants with patch repairs required reoperation for a bleeding complication more often than those repaired with a muscle flap [5 (56%) versus 1 (7%), p=0.02].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No prenatal indicator of disease severity accurately predicted survival. Patch and muscle flap repair are both accepted techniques to repair R-CDH defects. All but one infant diagnosed prenatally with R-CDH required ECMO, underscoring the critical need for delivery at a tertiary care center equipped with ECMO capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"162734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Identify the most accurate prenatal predictor of survival for infants with right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (R-CDH), analyze management strategies and outcomes and evaluate differences in outcomes based on surgical repair techniques.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of infants diagnosed with R-CDH at a single institution from 2010-2024. Prenatal ultrasound and MRI values were analyzed to predict survival as well as secondary outcomes including need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), duration on mechanical ventilation, length of hospitalization (LOH), and severity of pulmonary hypertension. Outcomes between repair techniques were compared in a subgroup analysis.

Results: Thirty-two infants with R-CDH met inclusion criteria. Overall survival to discharge was 75%. Seventeen (53%) had prenatal imaging and were diagnosed prenatally. Among ultrasound and MRI prenatal predicitive indices, no thresholds to accurately distinguish survivors from non-survivors were identified. All but one infant diagnosed prenatally required ECMO. Nine (28%) underwent primary repair, nine (28%) were repaired with a synthetic patch, and 14 (44%) with a transversus abdominus muscle flap. Infants with patch repairs required reoperation for a bleeding complication more often than those repaired with a muscle flap [5 (56%) versus 1 (7%), p=0.02].

Conclusion: No prenatal indicator of disease severity accurately predicted survival. Patch and muscle flap repair are both accepted techniques to repair R-CDH defects. All but one infant diagnosed prenatally with R-CDH required ECMO, underscoring the critical need for delivery at a tertiary care center equipped with ECMO capabilities.

右侧先天性膈疝:特征、产前影像学预测和预后的应用。
目的:确定婴儿右侧先天性膈疝(R-CDH)最准确的产前生存预测因子,分析治疗策略和结果,并评估基于手术修复技术的结果差异。方法:我们对2010-2024年在一家机构诊断为R-CDH的婴儿进行了回顾性研究。分析产前超声和MRI值以预测生存以及次要结局,包括体外膜氧合(ECMO)需求、机械通气持续时间、住院时间(LOH)和肺动脉高压严重程度。在亚组分析中比较修复技术之间的结果。结果:32例R-CDH患儿符合纳入标准。总生存率为75%。17例(53%)进行了产前影像学检查并在产前确诊。在超声和MRI产前预测指标中,没有确定准确区分幸存者和非幸存者的阈值。除了一名婴儿外,所有产前诊断的婴儿都需要体外膜肺栓塞。9例(28%)接受了初级修复,9例(28%)采用了人工补片修复,14例(44%)采用了腹横肌瓣修复。采用补片修复的婴儿因出血并发症需要再次手术的比例高于采用肌肉瓣修复的婴儿[5(56%)比1 (7%),p=0.02]。结论:没有产前疾病严重程度指标能准确预测生存率。膜片和肌瓣修复是修复R-CDH缺陷的常用方法。产前诊断为R-CDH的婴儿除一人外均需要ECMO,这强调了在配备ECMO功能的三级保健中心分娩的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信