Enduring Outcomes of COVID-19 Work Absences on the US Labor Market.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Julia M Dennett, Evan J Soltas, Gopi Shah Goda, Thomas A Thornhill, Kevin Werner, Gregg S Gonsalves
{"title":"Enduring Outcomes of COVID-19 Work Absences on the US Labor Market.","authors":"Julia M Dennett, Evan J Soltas, Gopi Shah Goda, Thomas A Thornhill, Kevin Werner, Gregg S Gonsalves","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although the adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US labor market have been well documented, the impacts of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 circulation are less clear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the extent to which COVID-19 continues to generate work absences and decrease labor force participation beyond the pandemic period in the US.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used monthly data from employed survey respondents in the nationally representative Current Population Survey spanning January 2010 to December 2024 and linked to COVID-19 wastewater surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The setting was the US before the COVID-19 pandemic (before March 2020), during the pandemic (March 2020 to April 2023), and after the end of the public health emergency declaration (May 2023 to December 2024).</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>COVID-19 prevalence as measured by wastewater viral activity levels and comparisons across the periods before, during, and after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were health-related absences from work and subsequent labor force exits. The association between health-related absences and all measures of wastewater viral activity was analyzed using state-level data and linear regressions with state and month fixed effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort was the employed US population and represented approximately 158.4 million workers in February 2020. At this baseline, approximately 35% of workers (55.3 million workers) were aged 15 to 34 years, 41% (65.1 million workers) were aged 35 to 54 years, and 24% (38.0 million workers) were aged 55 years and older; 48% (75.2 million workers) were female; 1% (1.7 million workers) were American Indian, 7% (10.5 million workers) were Asian, 18% (27.7 million workers) were Hispanic, 11% (18.1 million workers) were non-Hispanic Black, and 62% (97.9 million workers) were non-Hispanic White; and 33% (52.5 million workers) had educational attainment of high school or less. Adverse outcomes from the COVID-19 pandemic persisted, although at attenuated levels compared with the acute pandemic period. Health-related absences from work continued to track COVID-19 circulation and were 12.9% higher in the postpandemic period compared with before the pandemic (140 000 monthly absences). Workers in occupations at greater risk of exposure and some demographic groups continued to experience elevated levels of absences in the postpandemic period. Specifically, absences were 8.1% higher for workers in low work-from-home occupations and 12.5% higher for workers in high physical proximity occupations compared with prepandemic values. Labor force exits after a health-related absence also continued to be elevated, with 13.1% more exits in the postpandemic period compared with before the pandemic (13 500 monthly exits).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of employed workers in the US, the new year-round baseline for work absences appeared to be on par with the levels formerly confined to prepandemic influenza season conditions. Policymakers should consider the consequences for workers, including the value of policies and actions that mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. This study additionally highlights the potential for using nationally representative labor market data to monitor the impacts of public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2536635"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36635","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although the adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US labor market have been well documented, the impacts of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 circulation are less clear.

Objective: To determine the extent to which COVID-19 continues to generate work absences and decrease labor force participation beyond the pandemic period in the US.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used monthly data from employed survey respondents in the nationally representative Current Population Survey spanning January 2010 to December 2024 and linked to COVID-19 wastewater surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The setting was the US before the COVID-19 pandemic (before March 2020), during the pandemic (March 2020 to April 2023), and after the end of the public health emergency declaration (May 2023 to December 2024).

Exposures: COVID-19 prevalence as measured by wastewater viral activity levels and comparisons across the periods before, during, and after the pandemic.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were health-related absences from work and subsequent labor force exits. The association between health-related absences and all measures of wastewater viral activity was analyzed using state-level data and linear regressions with state and month fixed effects.

Results: The study cohort was the employed US population and represented approximately 158.4 million workers in February 2020. At this baseline, approximately 35% of workers (55.3 million workers) were aged 15 to 34 years, 41% (65.1 million workers) were aged 35 to 54 years, and 24% (38.0 million workers) were aged 55 years and older; 48% (75.2 million workers) were female; 1% (1.7 million workers) were American Indian, 7% (10.5 million workers) were Asian, 18% (27.7 million workers) were Hispanic, 11% (18.1 million workers) were non-Hispanic Black, and 62% (97.9 million workers) were non-Hispanic White; and 33% (52.5 million workers) had educational attainment of high school or less. Adverse outcomes from the COVID-19 pandemic persisted, although at attenuated levels compared with the acute pandemic period. Health-related absences from work continued to track COVID-19 circulation and were 12.9% higher in the postpandemic period compared with before the pandemic (140 000 monthly absences). Workers in occupations at greater risk of exposure and some demographic groups continued to experience elevated levels of absences in the postpandemic period. Specifically, absences were 8.1% higher for workers in low work-from-home occupations and 12.5% higher for workers in high physical proximity occupations compared with prepandemic values. Labor force exits after a health-related absence also continued to be elevated, with 13.1% more exits in the postpandemic period compared with before the pandemic (13 500 monthly exits).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of employed workers in the US, the new year-round baseline for work absences appeared to be on par with the levels formerly confined to prepandemic influenza season conditions. Policymakers should consider the consequences for workers, including the value of policies and actions that mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. This study additionally highlights the potential for using nationally representative labor market data to monitor the impacts of public health crises.

COVID-19对美国劳动力市场的持续影响
重要性:尽管COVID-19大流行对美国劳动力市场的不利后果已被充分记录,但持续的SARS-CoV-2传播的影响尚不清楚。目的:确定COVID-19在美国大流行期间继续导致缺勤和劳动力参与率下降的程度。设计、环境和参与者:本队列研究使用了2010年1月至2024年12月全国代表性当前人口调查中受雇调查受访者的月度数据,并与疾病控制和预防中心的COVID-19废水监测数据相关联。研究的背景是美国在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前(2020年3月之前)、大流行期间(2020年3月至2023年4月)和公共卫生紧急状态宣布结束后(2023年5月至2024年12月)。暴露:以废水病毒活性水平衡量的COVID-19流行率,以及大流行之前、期间和之后各时期的比较。主要结局和措施:主要结局是与健康相关的缺勤和随后的劳动力退出。使用州级数据和具有州和月份固定效应的线性回归分析了与健康相关的缺位与废水病毒活性的所有测量之间的关联。结果:研究队列是美国就业人口,截至2020年2月,约有1.584亿工人。在这一基线上,大约35%的工人(5530万工人)年龄在15至34岁之间,41%(6510万工人)年龄在35至54岁之间,24%(3800万工人)年龄在55岁及以上;女性占48%(7520万);1%(170万工人)是美洲印第安人,7%(1050万工人)是亚洲人,18%(2770万工人)是西班牙裔,11%(1810万工人)是非西班牙裔黑人,62%(9790万工人)是非西班牙裔白人;33%(5250万工人)的受教育程度为高中或以下。COVID-19大流行的不良后果持续存在,尽管与急性大流行时期相比有所减弱。与健康相关的缺勤继续跟踪COVID-19的循环,与大流行前相比,大流行后时期的缺勤率增加了12.9%(每月缺勤140,000 )。在大流行后时期,从事接触风险较大职业的工人和一些人口群体的缺勤率继续上升。具体而言,与大流行前的数值相比,在家工作较少的工人的缺勤率高出8.1%,身体距离较近的工人的缺勤率高出12.5%。因健康原因缺勤后的劳动力离职率也继续上升,与大流行前相比,大流行后时期的离职率增加了13.1%(13 每月离职500人)。结论和相关性:在这项对美国就业工人的队列研究中,新的全年缺勤基线似乎与以前仅限于流感大流行前季节条件的水平相当。政策制定者应考虑对工人的影响,包括减轻COVID-19在工作场所传播的政策和行动的价值。这项研究还强调了利用具有全国代表性的劳动力市场数据来监测公共卫生危机影响的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信