Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Transitional Care Intervention Using Automated Text Messaging and Virtual Visits after Emergency Department Discharges: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Grace Lee, Courtenay R Bruce, Tariq Nisar, Brendan M Holderread, Sarah N Pletcher, Ngoc-Anh Anh Nguyen
{"title":"Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Transitional Care Intervention Using Automated Text Messaging and Virtual Visits after Emergency Department Discharges: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Grace Lee, Courtenay R Bruce, Tariq Nisar, Brendan M Holderread, Sarah N Pletcher, Ngoc-Anh Anh Nguyen","doi":"10.2196/77973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding and avoidable revisits represent significant challenges for healthcare systems, with approximately 20% of patients returning to the ED within 30 days of discharge. To reduce avoidable acute care use, many health systems have adopted ED-based transitional care interventions (TCIs). Among the most scalable and cost-effective strategies is automated text messaging outreach, which facilitates timely follow-up and reinforces discharge instructions. Despite its promise, evidence supporting this approach remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>(1) Describe the design, implementation, and outcomes of a novel TCI utilizing SMS text messaging and virtual transitional care visits, and (2) assess its effect on unplanned ED revisits for the same presenting complaint as well as subsequent ambulatory follow-up engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study included patients discharged from four EDs within a single U.S. health system between September 2023 and September 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their engagement with the intervention: (1) the Completed Virtual Transitional Care Visit group (requested, scheduled, and completed a visit) and the (2) Noncompleted Virtual Transitional Care Visit group (requested, scheduled, but did not complete a visit). The primary outcome was spontaneous, unplanned ED revisits within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included outpatient follow-up and time to first outpatient evaluation. Between group differences were assessed using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 68,115 discharged patients during the study period, 42.7% (29,100) received an automated text for the virtual transitional care program, and 2.9% (853/29,100) accessed the scheduling link. Of these, 56.5% (482/853) requested a virtual transitional care visit, 49.8% (240/482) scheduled an appointment, and 70.0% (168/240) completed the visit (Completed group). Among the 72 Noncompleted patients, 56.9% no-showed, 31.9% canceled, and 11.1% scheduled two appointments but completed neither. Nearly half (48.6%) of the Noncompleted group had an outpatient follow-up, indicating variable engagement. Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical acuity were similar between groups. The Noncompleted group was nearly twice as likely to return to the ED within 90 days (27.8% vs 15.5%; χ²₁=4.20, P=0.04; OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.02-4.33) while the Completed group was more likely to complete outpatient follow-up (48.6% vs 30.0%; χ²₁=6.60, P=0.01; OR=2.17, 95% CI 1.23-3.83). Time to first outpatient visit did not differ significantly between groups (mean = 15.7 days vs. 19.8 days; Δβ = -1.93; 95% CI: -10.09 to 6.42; P = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A TCI combining automated text messaging with virtual visits was associated with reduced 90-day spontaneous ED revisits and increased outpatient follow-up. While the intervention demonstrated significant clinical benefits among engaged patients, the low initial engagement rate (2.9%) highlights substantial challenges in achieving population-level impact. Future efforts should focus on optimizing care delivery for engaged patients while developing strategies to expand program reach across the broader ED discharge population.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/77973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding and avoidable revisits represent significant challenges for healthcare systems, with approximately 20% of patients returning to the ED within 30 days of discharge. To reduce avoidable acute care use, many health systems have adopted ED-based transitional care interventions (TCIs). Among the most scalable and cost-effective strategies is automated text messaging outreach, which facilitates timely follow-up and reinforces discharge instructions. Despite its promise, evidence supporting this approach remains limited.

Objective: (1) Describe the design, implementation, and outcomes of a novel TCI utilizing SMS text messaging and virtual transitional care visits, and (2) assess its effect on unplanned ED revisits for the same presenting complaint as well as subsequent ambulatory follow-up engagement.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included patients discharged from four EDs within a single U.S. health system between September 2023 and September 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their engagement with the intervention: (1) the Completed Virtual Transitional Care Visit group (requested, scheduled, and completed a visit) and the (2) Noncompleted Virtual Transitional Care Visit group (requested, scheduled, but did not complete a visit). The primary outcome was spontaneous, unplanned ED revisits within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included outpatient follow-up and time to first outpatient evaluation. Between group differences were assessed using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models (P < 0.05).

Results: Of the 68,115 discharged patients during the study period, 42.7% (29,100) received an automated text for the virtual transitional care program, and 2.9% (853/29,100) accessed the scheduling link. Of these, 56.5% (482/853) requested a virtual transitional care visit, 49.8% (240/482) scheduled an appointment, and 70.0% (168/240) completed the visit (Completed group). Among the 72 Noncompleted patients, 56.9% no-showed, 31.9% canceled, and 11.1% scheduled two appointments but completed neither. Nearly half (48.6%) of the Noncompleted group had an outpatient follow-up, indicating variable engagement. Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical acuity were similar between groups. The Noncompleted group was nearly twice as likely to return to the ED within 90 days (27.8% vs 15.5%; χ²₁=4.20, P=0.04; OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.02-4.33) while the Completed group was more likely to complete outpatient follow-up (48.6% vs 30.0%; χ²₁=6.60, P=0.01; OR=2.17, 95% CI 1.23-3.83). Time to first outpatient visit did not differ significantly between groups (mean = 15.7 days vs. 19.8 days; Δβ = -1.93; 95% CI: -10.09 to 6.42; P = 0.65).

Conclusions: A TCI combining automated text messaging with virtual visits was associated with reduced 90-day spontaneous ED revisits and increased outpatient follow-up. While the intervention demonstrated significant clinical benefits among engaged patients, the low initial engagement rate (2.9%) highlights substantial challenges in achieving population-level impact. Future efforts should focus on optimizing care delivery for engaged patients while developing strategies to expand program reach across the broader ED discharge population.

Clinicaltrial:

急诊科出院后使用自动短信和虚拟访问的虚拟过渡护理干预的实施和评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:急诊科(ED)过度拥挤和可避免的复诊对医疗保健系统构成了重大挑战,大约20%的患者在出院后30天内返回急诊室。为了减少可避免的急性护理使用,许多卫生系统采用了基于ed的过渡护理干预措施(tci)。最具可扩展性和成本效益的战略之一是自动短信外展,这有助于及时跟进并加强出院指示。尽管前景看好,但支持这种方法的证据仍然有限。目的:(1)描述一种利用短信和虚拟过渡护理就诊的新型TCI的设计、实施和结果;(2)评估其对同一主诉的计划外急诊科就诊以及随后的门诊随访的影响。方法:这项回顾性观察队列研究纳入了2023年9月至2024年9月期间从美国单一卫生系统的四个急诊科出院的患者。根据患者参与干预的程度,将患者分为两组:(1)完成虚拟过渡护理访问组(请求、安排和完成访问)和(2)未完成虚拟过渡护理访问组(请求、安排但未完成访问)。主要结果是90天内自发的、计划外的ED复诊。次要结局包括门诊随访和到首次门诊评估的时间。采用描述性统计和多变量回归模型评估组间差异(P < 0.05)。结果:在研究期间的68,115名出院患者中,42.7%(29,100)收到了虚拟过渡护理计划的自动文本,2.9%(853/29,100)访问了调度链接。其中,56.5%(482/853)要求进行虚拟过渡护理访问,49.8%(240/482)安排了预约,70.0%(168/240)完成了访问(完成组)。在72名未完成的患者中,56.9%的患者未到诊,31.9%的患者取消了预约,11.1%的患者安排了两次预约,但都没有完成。近一半(48.6%)的未完成组进行了门诊随访,表明参与程度不同。两组之间的人口统计学、合并症和临床敏锐度相似。未完成组在90天内返回ED的可能性几乎是其两倍(27.8% vs 15.5%; χ²₁=4.20,P=0.04; OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.02-4.33),而完成组完成门诊随访的可能性更大(48.6% vs 30.0%; χ²₁=6.60,P=0.01; OR=2.17, 95% CI 1.23-3.83)。首次门诊就诊时间组间无显著差异(平均15.7天vs. 19.8天;Δβ = -1.93; 95% CI: -10.09 ~ 6.42; P = 0.65)。结论:TCI结合自动短信和虚拟就诊可减少90天的自发性急诊科就诊和增加门诊随访。虽然干预在参与的患者中显示出显著的临床效益,但较低的初始参与率(2.9%)突出了在实现人口水平影响方面的重大挑战。未来的努力应集中在优化参与患者的护理服务,同时制定战略,扩大项目覆盖更广泛的急诊科出院人群。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信