The association between polypharmacy and mortality in patients with heart failure: Results from the PULSE dataset.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Janine Beezer, Andrew L Clark, Adam Todd, Andrew Kingston, Andrew Husband
{"title":"The association between polypharmacy and mortality in patients with heart failure: Results from the PULSE dataset.","authors":"Janine Beezer, Andrew L Clark, Adam Todd, Andrew Kingston, Andrew Husband","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Mortality remains high in heart failure despite advances in heart failure therapy. Heart failure patients are generally older, with multiple long-term conditions, and polypharmacy is common. This study explores the association between polypharmacy and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study collected medication data on admission and discharge from the first heart failure hospitalisation. Association with mortality was explored using Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability weighting regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 660 patients were included, 367 (56%) male, mean age 76.1 (SD ±12.3) and almost 60% (338/660) had died at study end. Median follow-up time was 2.9 years (25th and 75th quartiles 1.6 and 4.5). It was rare to be discharged from hospital with no polypharmacy (5%, n = 31). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was associated with a 32% (HR 1.32, CI 1.08-1.61, P = 0.007) higher mortality compared to HFrEF. In those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), univariable analysis showed hyperpolypharmacy was associated with twice the mortality compared to polypharmacy (HR 1.95, CI 1.36-2.82, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the association between polypharmacy and mortality was lost. The average treatment effect for hyperpolypharmacy was associated with 26% (Coeff. -0.26, CI -0.43 to -0.09, P = 0.003) higher mortality than polypharmacy. The chance of survival to the end of follow-up was 80% (Coeff. 0.80, CI 0.64-0.95, P < 0.01) for those with polypharmacy, and 54% (Coeff. 0.54, CI 0.46-0.61, P < 0.01) for those with hyperpolypharmacy. In HFpEF, hyperpolypharmacy, univariable analysis was not associated with mortality (HR 0.93, CI 0.70-1.24, P = 0.63). Average treatment effect also showed that hyperpolypharmacy was not associated with mortality (Coeff. -0.03, CI -0.15 to 0.08, P = 0.55). The chance of survival to the end of follow-up was 67% (Coeff. 0.67, CI 0.58-0.77, P < 0.01) with polypharmacy and 64% (Coeff. 0.64, CI 0.57-0.71, P < 0.01) with hyperpolypharmacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age, sex, CCI, and CFS are strong mortality predictors for HF irrespective of HF subgroup. Rigorous confounding adjustment suggests polypharmacy is associated with mortality following hospitalisation for HFrEF but not HFpEF. Further studies are needed to address the complex interplay between polypharmacy, age, comorbidity, and frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Mortality remains high in heart failure despite advances in heart failure therapy. Heart failure patients are generally older, with multiple long-term conditions, and polypharmacy is common. This study explores the association between polypharmacy and mortality.

Methods: This retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study collected medication data on admission and discharge from the first heart failure hospitalisation. Association with mortality was explored using Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability weighting regression analysis.

Results: A total of 660 patients were included, 367 (56%) male, mean age 76.1 (SD ±12.3) and almost 60% (338/660) had died at study end. Median follow-up time was 2.9 years (25th and 75th quartiles 1.6 and 4.5). It was rare to be discharged from hospital with no polypharmacy (5%, n = 31). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was associated with a 32% (HR 1.32, CI 1.08-1.61, P = 0.007) higher mortality compared to HFrEF. In those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), univariable analysis showed hyperpolypharmacy was associated with twice the mortality compared to polypharmacy (HR 1.95, CI 1.36-2.82, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the association between polypharmacy and mortality was lost. The average treatment effect for hyperpolypharmacy was associated with 26% (Coeff. -0.26, CI -0.43 to -0.09, P = 0.003) higher mortality than polypharmacy. The chance of survival to the end of follow-up was 80% (Coeff. 0.80, CI 0.64-0.95, P < 0.01) for those with polypharmacy, and 54% (Coeff. 0.54, CI 0.46-0.61, P < 0.01) for those with hyperpolypharmacy. In HFpEF, hyperpolypharmacy, univariable analysis was not associated with mortality (HR 0.93, CI 0.70-1.24, P = 0.63). Average treatment effect also showed that hyperpolypharmacy was not associated with mortality (Coeff. -0.03, CI -0.15 to 0.08, P = 0.55). The chance of survival to the end of follow-up was 67% (Coeff. 0.67, CI 0.58-0.77, P < 0.01) with polypharmacy and 64% (Coeff. 0.64, CI 0.57-0.71, P < 0.01) with hyperpolypharmacy.

Conclusions: Age, sex, CCI, and CFS are strong mortality predictors for HF irrespective of HF subgroup. Rigorous confounding adjustment suggests polypharmacy is associated with mortality following hospitalisation for HFrEF but not HFpEF. Further studies are needed to address the complex interplay between polypharmacy, age, comorbidity, and frailty.

心衰患者多药治疗与死亡率之间的关系:PULSE数据集的结果
目的:尽管心力衰竭治疗取得进展,但心力衰竭的死亡率仍然很高。心力衰竭患者一般年龄较大,有多种长期病情,多药治疗较为常见。本研究探讨了多药与死亡率之间的关系。方法:本回顾性纵向观察队列研究收集了首次心力衰竭住院患者入院和出院时的用药资料。采用Cox比例风险模型和逆概率加权回归分析探讨与死亡率的关系。结果:共纳入660例患者,其中男性367例(56%),平均年龄76.1 (SD±12.3),研究结束时死亡近60%(338/660)。中位随访时间为2.9年(25分位数和75分位数分别为1.6年和4.5年)。出院时未出现复方用药的患者极少(5%,n = 31)。与HFrEF相比,保留射血分数(HFpEF)心力衰竭的死亡率高出32% (HR 1.32, CI 1.08-1.61, P = 0.007)。在心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的患者中,单变量分析显示,与多药治疗相比,多药治疗与两倍的死亡率相关(HR 1.95, CI 1.36-2.82, P)。结论:年龄、性别、CCI和CFS是HF的强死亡率预测因子,与HF亚组无关。严格的混杂校正表明,多药治疗与HFrEF住院后的死亡率相关,但与HFpEF无关。需要进一步的研究来解决多种药物、年龄、合并症和虚弱之间复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信