Comparative efficacy of 200 mg versus 1200 mg of simethicone with 3 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Xiaoyu Cai, Peng Xue, Yinpeng Li, Yinhua Rao, Xianrong Du, Lin Zhong, Ling Chen, Shuangyan Liu, Qian Yue, Dingguo Zhang
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of 200 mg versus 1200 mg of simethicone with 3 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Xiaoyu Cai, Peng Xue, Yinpeng Li, Yinhua Rao, Xianrong Du, Lin Zhong, Ling Chen, Shuangyan Liu, Qian Yue, Dingguo Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-04215-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simethicone (SIM) can enhance bowel preparation efficiency, but the optimal dose for patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy is still unclear. This study compares bowel preparation efficiency and adenoma detection rate (ADR) between patients receiving 3 L of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) with 200 mg SIM or 1200 mg SIM for afternoon colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial included consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy. It compared the effects of two SIM dosages (200 mg and 1200 mg) added to a 3 L PEG-ELS regimen. The primary outcome of our study was the rate of adequate bowel preparation, as defined by all 3 segments 2 or 3 on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary outcomes included the Bubble Scale (BS) score and ADR. Adverse effects related to bowel preparation were systematically administered by a trained nurse using standardized patient questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 668 participants were randomly assigned to either the 200 mg group (n = 332) or 1200 mg SIM group (n = 336). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in adequate bowel preparation rate (95.8% vs. 97.6%, P = 0.276) and ADR (22.3% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.561). Both regimens were well tolerated and accepted by participants, as assessed through a standardized patient questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>200 mg versus 1200 mg of SIM in 3 L PEG-ELS for afternoon colonoscopy demonstrated no statistically significant difference in bowel cleansing quality, ADR and bowel preparation-related adverse events. This evidence supports the clinical feasibility of 200 mg simethicone as an effective alternative for optimizing colonic preparation while maintaining procedural standards.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR2400089196) on 3 September 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04215-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simethicone (SIM) can enhance bowel preparation efficiency, but the optimal dose for patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy is still unclear. This study compares bowel preparation efficiency and adenoma detection rate (ADR) between patients receiving 3 L of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) with 200 mg SIM or 1200 mg SIM for afternoon colonoscopy.

Method: This prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial included consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy. It compared the effects of two SIM dosages (200 mg and 1200 mg) added to a 3 L PEG-ELS regimen. The primary outcome of our study was the rate of adequate bowel preparation, as defined by all 3 segments 2 or 3 on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary outcomes included the Bubble Scale (BS) score and ADR. Adverse effects related to bowel preparation were systematically administered by a trained nurse using standardized patient questionnaire.

Results: A total of 668 participants were randomly assigned to either the 200 mg group (n = 332) or 1200 mg SIM group (n = 336). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in adequate bowel preparation rate (95.8% vs. 97.6%, P = 0.276) and ADR (22.3% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.561). Both regimens were well tolerated and accepted by participants, as assessed through a standardized patient questionnaire.

Conclusion: 200 mg versus 1200 mg of SIM in 3 L PEG-ELS for afternoon colonoscopy demonstrated no statistically significant difference in bowel cleansing quality, ADR and bowel preparation-related adverse events. This evidence supports the clinical feasibility of 200 mg simethicone as an effective alternative for optimizing colonic preparation while maintaining procedural standards.

Trial registration: This clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR2400089196) on 3 September 2024.

200毫克与1200毫克西甲硅氧烷与3l聚乙二醇电解质溶液用于下午结肠镜检查的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验。
背景:simmethicone (SIM)可以提高肠道准备效率,但下午结肠镜检查患者的最佳剂量尚不清楚。本研究比较了下午结肠镜检查时接受3l聚乙二醇电解质溶液(PEG-ELS)加200 mg SIM或1200 mg SIM的患者的肠道准备效率和腺瘤检出率(ADR)。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、观察盲法试验纳入了连续接受结肠镜检查的患者。它比较了两种SIM剂量(200毫克和1200毫克)添加到3l PEG-ELS方案中的效果。本研究的主要结局是肠准备充分率,由波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)的所有3个部分2或3定义。次要结局包括BS评分和不良反应。与肠道准备相关的不良反应由训练有素的护士使用标准化的患者问卷进行系统管理。结果:共有668名参与者被随机分配到200 mg组(n = 332)或1200 mg SIM组(n = 336)。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。此外,在充分的肠道准备率(95.8% vs. 97.6%, P = 0.276)和不良反应(22.3% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.561)方面没有观察到显著差异。通过标准化的患者问卷评估,两种方案都被参与者良好地耐受和接受。结论:在下午结肠镜检查中,3l PEG-ELS中200 mg与1200 mg的SIM在肠道清洁质量、不良反应和肠道准备相关不良事件方面无统计学差异。这一证据支持200mg西甲硅氧烷作为优化结肠制备同时保持程序标准的有效替代方案的临床可行性。试验注册:本临床试验在中国临床试验注册中心回顾性注册(注册号:ChiCTR2400089196), 2024年9月3日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信