Faith Miller, Jenevieve Mannell, Laura Brown, Andrew Gibbs, Abigail Hatcher
{"title":"Association between food insecurity and intimate partner violence: the role of gendered asset policies.","authors":"Faith Miller, Jenevieve Mannell, Laura Brown, Andrew Gibbs, Abigail Hatcher","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects an estimated 27% of women globally, with consequences spanning mental, physical and societal well-being. Previous research identifies individual and relational risk factors for IPV, but less is known about wider structural factors. This study examines the association between food insecurity and IPV using nationally-representative data from 156 countries, exploring gendered asset policies as a potential mediator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used nationally representative survey data on women's experience of IPV (1993-2019) and the Food and Agriculture Organization data on moderate to severe food insecurity. Multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear models estimated the association between standardised variables for food insecurity and IPV, accounting for country-level clustering and adjusting for gross domestic product (GDP). Mediation analysis estimated the role of gendered asset policies (Women, Business and the Law Index Score). Sensitivity analyses lagged food insecurity by at least 4 years among a subset of 59 countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined data from 219 country-years representing 156 countries globally across the period of 1993-2019. After controlling for national GDP, models estimated an independent cross-sectional association between food insecurity and IPV (<i>b=</i>0.49; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.62). Gendered asset policies mediated 18.9% of the food insecurity-IPV relationship (indirect effect 0.099 (0.044-0.155); total effect 0.526 (0.422-0.631)). In lagged analysis, food insecurity was associated with higher IPV 2 years later (<i>b=</i>0.78; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.06), with a similar mediation effect (21.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is among the first to harness global data to demonstrate country-level effects of food insecurity on IPV, which countries enacting more equitable asset policies were able to mitigate a substantial proportion of. Future research should prospectively pinpoint how supportive gender policies and asset ownership can amplify the benefits of food security for women's safety and longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects an estimated 27% of women globally, with consequences spanning mental, physical and societal well-being. Previous research identifies individual and relational risk factors for IPV, but less is known about wider structural factors. This study examines the association between food insecurity and IPV using nationally-representative data from 156 countries, exploring gendered asset policies as a potential mediator.
Methods: We used nationally representative survey data on women's experience of IPV (1993-2019) and the Food and Agriculture Organization data on moderate to severe food insecurity. Multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear models estimated the association between standardised variables for food insecurity and IPV, accounting for country-level clustering and adjusting for gross domestic product (GDP). Mediation analysis estimated the role of gendered asset policies (Women, Business and the Law Index Score). Sensitivity analyses lagged food insecurity by at least 4 years among a subset of 59 countries.
Results: We examined data from 219 country-years representing 156 countries globally across the period of 1993-2019. After controlling for national GDP, models estimated an independent cross-sectional association between food insecurity and IPV (b=0.49; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.62). Gendered asset policies mediated 18.9% of the food insecurity-IPV relationship (indirect effect 0.099 (0.044-0.155); total effect 0.526 (0.422-0.631)). In lagged analysis, food insecurity was associated with higher IPV 2 years later (b=0.78; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.06), with a similar mediation effect (21.0%).
Conclusion: This study is among the first to harness global data to demonstrate country-level effects of food insecurity on IPV, which countries enacting more equitable asset policies were able to mitigate a substantial proportion of. Future research should prospectively pinpoint how supportive gender policies and asset ownership can amplify the benefits of food security for women's safety and longevity.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)影响着全球约27%的妇女,其后果涉及精神、身体和社会福祉。先前的研究确定了IPV的个体和相关风险因素,但对更广泛的结构性因素知之甚少。本研究利用来自156个国家的具有全国代表性的数据考察了粮食不安全和IPV之间的关系,探讨了性别资产政策作为潜在中介的作用。方法:我们使用了具有全国代表性的关于妇女IPV经历的调查数据(1993-2019)和粮食及农业组织关于中度至重度粮食不安全的数据。多层混合效应广义线性模型估计了粮食不安全标准化变量与IPV之间的关联,考虑了国家层面的聚类并根据国内生产总值(GDP)进行了调整。调解分析估计了性别资产政策的作用(妇女、商业和法律指数得分)。在59个国家中,敏感性分析的粮食不安全状况落后至少4年。结果:我们研究了1993年至2019年期间代表全球156个国家的219个国家年的数据。在控制了国家GDP之后,模型估计了粮食不安全和IPV之间的独立横断面关联(b=0.49; 95% CI 0.37至0.62)。性别资产政策介导了18.9%的粮食不安全- ipv关系(间接效应0.099 (0.044-0.155);总效应0.526(0.422-0.631))。在滞后分析中,粮食不安全与2年后较高的IPV相关(b=0.78; 95% CI 0.48至1.06),具有类似的中介效应(21.0%)。结论:本研究是第一批利用全球数据来证明粮食不安全对IPV的国家层面影响的研究之一,制定更公平的资产政策的国家能够在很大程度上减轻IPV的影响。未来的研究应该前瞻性地指出,支持性的性别政策和资产所有权如何能够扩大粮食安全对妇女安全和长寿的好处。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.