Patient Perceptions of and Experiences with Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ameet Sarpatwari, Su Been Lee, Heidi Zakoul, Winta Tekle, Ariel Freedman, Shruti Belitkar, Gita A Toyserkani, Cynthia LaCivita, Esther H Zhou, Kate Heinrich Oswell, Gerald J Dal Pan, Aaron S Kesselheim
{"title":"Patient Perceptions of and Experiences with Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies.","authors":"Ameet Sarpatwari, Su Been Lee, Heidi Zakoul, Winta Tekle, Ariel Freedman, Shruti Belitkar, Gita A Toyserkani, Cynthia LaCivita, Esther H Zhou, Kate Heinrich Oswell, Gerald J Dal Pan, Aaron S Kesselheim","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration involve special interventions such as education or documentation of laboratory testing to ensure that the benefits of certain drugs outweigh their risks. To understand patients' and caregivers' perception of and experiences with REMS programs with elements to assure safe use, we conducted semi-structured interviews from March 2022 to July 2023 with 135 patients or caregivers of patients who had used alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), ambrisentan (Letairis), clozapine (Clozaril), isotretinoin (Accutane), lenalidomide (Revlimid), pegvaliase (Palynziq), or sodium oxybate (Xyrem/Xywav). Participants were recruited through national and regional patient volunteer registries, social media, and patient support groups. Interviews focused on patients' and caregivers' knowledge about the REMS program and REMS-related side effects, treatment initiation, medication access and adherence, pandemic policies, and overall perspectives. Among 135 participants, five key themes emerged: (1) Participants were knowledgeable about REMS-associated drug risks and requirements; (2) some participants had difficulty finding prescribers, particularly for clozapine; (3) administrative burdens related to REMS implementation were a source of frustration, with satisfaction higher when care coordination support was provided; (4) emotional and logistical challenges were identified with pregnancy- and clozapine-related testing; and (5) participants desired similar engagement around risks not covered in REMS materials. Optimizing system-level implementation can help improve REMS implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration involve special interventions such as education or documentation of laboratory testing to ensure that the benefits of certain drugs outweigh their risks. To understand patients' and caregivers' perception of and experiences with REMS programs with elements to assure safe use, we conducted semi-structured interviews from March 2022 to July 2023 with 135 patients or caregivers of patients who had used alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), ambrisentan (Letairis), clozapine (Clozaril), isotretinoin (Accutane), lenalidomide (Revlimid), pegvaliase (Palynziq), or sodium oxybate (Xyrem/Xywav). Participants were recruited through national and regional patient volunteer registries, social media, and patient support groups. Interviews focused on patients' and caregivers' knowledge about the REMS program and REMS-related side effects, treatment initiation, medication access and adherence, pandemic policies, and overall perspectives. Among 135 participants, five key themes emerged: (1) Participants were knowledgeable about REMS-associated drug risks and requirements; (2) some participants had difficulty finding prescribers, particularly for clozapine; (3) administrative burdens related to REMS implementation were a source of frustration, with satisfaction higher when care coordination support was provided; (4) emotional and logistical challenges were identified with pregnancy- and clozapine-related testing; and (5) participants desired similar engagement around risks not covered in REMS materials. Optimizing system-level implementation can help improve REMS implementation.

患者对风险评估和缓解策略的认知和经验。
美国食品和药物管理局授权的风险评估和缓解策略(REMS)项目涉及特殊干预措施,如教育或实验室测试文件,以确保某些药物的益处大于其风险。为了了解患者和护理人员对具有确保安全使用元素的REMS项目的看法和经验,我们从2022年3月至2023年7月对135名使用过阿仑单抗(Lemtrada)、氨布森坦(Letairis)、氯氮平(Clozaril)、异维甲酸(Accutane)、来那度胺(Revlimid)、pegvaliase (Palynziq)或羟酸钠(Xyrem/Xywav)的患者或患者的护理人员进行了半结构化访谈。参与者是通过国家和地区患者志愿者登记处、社交媒体和患者支持团体招募的。访谈的重点是患者和护理人员对REMS项目和与REMS相关的副作用、治疗开始、药物获取和依从性、流行病政策和总体观点的了解。在135名参与者中,出现了五个关键主题:(1)参与者了解与rem相关的药物风险和要求;(2)部分参与者难以找到处方医师,尤其是氯氮平;(3)与实施REMS相关的行政负担是令人沮丧的原因,提供护理协调支持时满意度更高;(4)通过妊娠和氯氮平相关测试确定情绪和后勤挑战;(5)参与者希望对REMS材料中未涵盖的风险进行类似的参与。优化系统级实现有助于改进REMS实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信