Ryan Turner, Carl Higgs, Vuokko Heikinheimo, Ruth Hunter, Júlio Celso Borello Vargas, Shiqin Liu, Eugen Resendiz, Geoff Boeing, Deepti Adlakha, Rossano Schifanella, Giovani Longo Rosa, Daria Pugacheva, Ruoyu Chen, Mahtab Baghaie Poor, Javier Molina-García, Ana Queralt, Anna Puig-Ribera, Pau Serra del Pozo, Case Garza, Joanna Valson, Deborah Salvo, Ester Cerin, Erica Hinckson, Melanie Lowe
{"title":"Internationally Validated Open Access Indicators of Large Public Urban Green Space for Healthy and Sustainable Cities","authors":"Ryan Turner, Carl Higgs, Vuokko Heikinheimo, Ruth Hunter, Júlio Celso Borello Vargas, Shiqin Liu, Eugen Resendiz, Geoff Boeing, Deepti Adlakha, Rossano Schifanella, Giovani Longo Rosa, Daria Pugacheva, Ruoyu Chen, Mahtab Baghaie Poor, Javier Molina-García, Ana Queralt, Anna Puig-Ribera, Pau Serra del Pozo, Case Garza, Joanna Valson, Deborah Salvo, Ester Cerin, Erica Hinckson, Melanie Lowe","doi":"10.1111/gean.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large public urban green spaces (LPUGS) provide multiple health and environmental co-benefits by mitigating urban heat, improving air quality and biodiversity, and promoting physical activity, social interactions, and mental wellbeing. There is a lack of accessible, evidence-informed, and internationally validated LPUGS indicators to assist with benchmarking and monitoring progress toward healthy and sustainable cities globally. This study developed and validated internationally applicable spatial indicators of LPUGS availability and accessibility that are directly relevant to health and sustainability outcomes. For 13 cities across 10 middle- to high-income countries, we identified LPUGS ≥ 1 ha by fusing OpenStreetMap and satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data, and estimated residents' access within 500 m pedestrian network distance. We conducted a two-step validation process with local collaborators in each city. Our indicator methods identified LPUGS with greater than 80% accuracy for 12 of the 13 cities, and comparisons against official local reference data for four cities further demonstrated validity. While some open data limitations were identified, the indicators address critical gaps in existing methods by enabling standardized and comparable measurement of LPUGS in diverse cities internationally. Our customizable open-source global indicator tools can inform evidence-based green space planning for urban health and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"57 4","pages":"793-808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Large public urban green spaces (LPUGS) provide multiple health and environmental co-benefits by mitigating urban heat, improving air quality and biodiversity, and promoting physical activity, social interactions, and mental wellbeing. There is a lack of accessible, evidence-informed, and internationally validated LPUGS indicators to assist with benchmarking and monitoring progress toward healthy and sustainable cities globally. This study developed and validated internationally applicable spatial indicators of LPUGS availability and accessibility that are directly relevant to health and sustainability outcomes. For 13 cities across 10 middle- to high-income countries, we identified LPUGS ≥ 1 ha by fusing OpenStreetMap and satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data, and estimated residents' access within 500 m pedestrian network distance. We conducted a two-step validation process with local collaborators in each city. Our indicator methods identified LPUGS with greater than 80% accuracy for 12 of the 13 cities, and comparisons against official local reference data for four cities further demonstrated validity. While some open data limitations were identified, the indicators address critical gaps in existing methods by enabling standardized and comparable measurement of LPUGS in diverse cities internationally. Our customizable open-source global indicator tools can inform evidence-based green space planning for urban health and sustainability.
期刊介绍:
First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.