Internationally Validated Open Access Indicators of Large Public Urban Green Space for Healthy and Sustainable Cities

IF 4.3 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Ryan Turner, Carl Higgs, Vuokko Heikinheimo, Ruth Hunter, Júlio Celso Borello Vargas, Shiqin Liu, Eugen Resendiz, Geoff Boeing, Deepti Adlakha, Rossano Schifanella, Giovani Longo Rosa, Daria Pugacheva, Ruoyu Chen, Mahtab Baghaie Poor, Javier Molina-García, Ana Queralt, Anna Puig-Ribera, Pau Serra del Pozo, Case Garza, Joanna Valson, Deborah Salvo, Ester Cerin, Erica Hinckson, Melanie Lowe
{"title":"Internationally Validated Open Access Indicators of Large Public Urban Green Space for Healthy and Sustainable Cities","authors":"Ryan Turner,&nbsp;Carl Higgs,&nbsp;Vuokko Heikinheimo,&nbsp;Ruth Hunter,&nbsp;Júlio Celso Borello Vargas,&nbsp;Shiqin Liu,&nbsp;Eugen Resendiz,&nbsp;Geoff Boeing,&nbsp;Deepti Adlakha,&nbsp;Rossano Schifanella,&nbsp;Giovani Longo Rosa,&nbsp;Daria Pugacheva,&nbsp;Ruoyu Chen,&nbsp;Mahtab Baghaie Poor,&nbsp;Javier Molina-García,&nbsp;Ana Queralt,&nbsp;Anna Puig-Ribera,&nbsp;Pau Serra del Pozo,&nbsp;Case Garza,&nbsp;Joanna Valson,&nbsp;Deborah Salvo,&nbsp;Ester Cerin,&nbsp;Erica Hinckson,&nbsp;Melanie Lowe","doi":"10.1111/gean.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large public urban green spaces (LPUGS) provide multiple health and environmental co-benefits by mitigating urban heat, improving air quality and biodiversity, and promoting physical activity, social interactions, and mental wellbeing. There is a lack of accessible, evidence-informed, and internationally validated LPUGS indicators to assist with benchmarking and monitoring progress toward healthy and sustainable cities globally. This study developed and validated internationally applicable spatial indicators of LPUGS availability and accessibility that are directly relevant to health and sustainability outcomes. For 13 cities across 10 middle- to high-income countries, we identified LPUGS ≥ 1 ha by fusing OpenStreetMap and satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data, and estimated residents' access within 500 m pedestrian network distance. We conducted a two-step validation process with local collaborators in each city. Our indicator methods identified LPUGS with greater than 80% accuracy for 12 of the 13 cities, and comparisons against official local reference data for four cities further demonstrated validity. While some open data limitations were identified, the indicators address critical gaps in existing methods by enabling standardized and comparable measurement of LPUGS in diverse cities internationally. Our customizable open-source global indicator tools can inform evidence-based green space planning for urban health and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"57 4","pages":"793-808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large public urban green spaces (LPUGS) provide multiple health and environmental co-benefits by mitigating urban heat, improving air quality and biodiversity, and promoting physical activity, social interactions, and mental wellbeing. There is a lack of accessible, evidence-informed, and internationally validated LPUGS indicators to assist with benchmarking and monitoring progress toward healthy and sustainable cities globally. This study developed and validated internationally applicable spatial indicators of LPUGS availability and accessibility that are directly relevant to health and sustainability outcomes. For 13 cities across 10 middle- to high-income countries, we identified LPUGS ≥ 1 ha by fusing OpenStreetMap and satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index data, and estimated residents' access within 500 m pedestrian network distance. We conducted a two-step validation process with local collaborators in each city. Our indicator methods identified LPUGS with greater than 80% accuracy for 12 of the 13 cities, and comparisons against official local reference data for four cities further demonstrated validity. While some open data limitations were identified, the indicators address critical gaps in existing methods by enabling standardized and comparable measurement of LPUGS in diverse cities internationally. Our customizable open-source global indicator tools can inform evidence-based green space planning for urban health and sustainability.

Abstract Image

面向健康和可持续发展城市的大型公共城市绿地开放获取指标
大型公共城市绿地(LPUGS)通过减轻城市热量、改善空气质量和生物多样性、促进身体活动、社会互动和心理健康,提供多种健康和环境效益。缺乏可获得的、循证的、国际认可的城市可持续发展目标指标,以协助制定基准并监测全球健康和可持续城市的进展情况。本研究制定并验证了与健康和可持续性结果直接相关的国际适用的LPUGS可用性和可及性空间指标。对于10个中高收入国家的13个城市,我们通过融合OpenStreetMap和卫星导出的归一化植被指数数据,确定了LPUGS≥1 ha,并估计了500 m步行网络距离内的居民访问。我们与每个城市的当地合作者进行了两步验证过程。我们的指标方法对13个城市中的12个城市的LPUGS的识别准确率超过80%,并与4个城市的当地官方参考数据进行了比较,进一步证明了其有效性。虽然确定了一些开放数据的局限性,但这些指标通过在国际上不同城市对LPUGS进行标准化和可比较的测量,解决了现有方法中的关键差距。我们可定制的开源全球指标工具可以为基于证据的城市健康和可持续性绿色空间规划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信