Lost in the Modeling Stage: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Real Estate Data

IF 3.7 Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Ian Lenaers, Lieven De Moor
{"title":"Lost in the Modeling Stage: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Real Estate Data","authors":"Ian Lenaers,&nbsp;Lieven De Moor","doi":"10.1002/isaf.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Machine learning dominates automated property valuation, yet comprehensive comparisons of predictive models remain scarce. This study compares 28 rent prediction models using 79,735 Belgian residential rental properties from 2022. Predictive performance is evaluated with traditional and alternative metrics for train data, test data, and across deciles. The results confirm that tree-based ensemble models outperform others, with stacking and averaging yielding superior results at a higher computational cost. Furthermore, middle-range rents show better predictive accuracy than extremes. Traditional and alternative metrics provide consistent findings. These insights aid real estate stakeholders seeking to enhance their expert systems for real estate price modeling.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53473,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isaf.70019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning dominates automated property valuation, yet comprehensive comparisons of predictive models remain scarce. This study compares 28 rent prediction models using 79,735 Belgian residential rental properties from 2022. Predictive performance is evaluated with traditional and alternative metrics for train data, test data, and across deciles. The results confirm that tree-based ensemble models outperform others, with stacking and averaging yielding superior results at a higher computational cost. Furthermore, middle-range rents show better predictive accuracy than extremes. Traditional and alternative metrics provide consistent findings. These insights aid real estate stakeholders seeking to enhance their expert systems for real estate price modeling.

Abstract Image

迷失在建模阶段:房地产数据机器学习模型的比较分析
机器学习主导着自动房地产估值,但预测模型的全面比较仍然很少。这项研究比较了28个租金预测模型,使用了比利时从2022年开始的79,735个住宅租赁物业。预测性能是用传统的和替代的训练数据、测试数据和跨十分位数的指标来评估的。结果证实,基于树的集成模型优于其他模型,在更高的计算成本下,堆叠和平均产生更好的结果。此外,中档租金的预测准确度高于极值租金。传统和替代度量提供一致的结果。这些见解有助于房地产利益相关者寻求增强他们的房地产价格建模专家系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management is a quarterly international journal which publishes original, high quality material dealing with all aspects of intelligent systems as they relate to the fields of accounting, economics, finance, marketing and management. In addition, the journal also is concerned with related emerging technologies, including big data, business intelligence, social media and other technologies. It encourages the development of novel technologies, and the embedding of new and existing technologies into applications of real, practical value. Therefore, implementation issues are of as much concern as development issues. The journal is designed to appeal to academics in the intelligent systems, emerging technologies and business fields, as well as to advanced practitioners who wish to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, or economy of their working practices. A special feature of the journal is the use of two groups of reviewers, those who specialize in intelligent systems work, and also those who specialize in applications areas. Reviewers are asked to address issues of originality and actual or potential impact on research, teaching, or practice in the accounting, finance, or management fields. Authors working on conceptual developments or on laboratory-based explorations of data sets therefore need to address the issue of potential impact at some level in submissions to the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信