Surveilling system exposure and parental institutional disengagement

IF 3.4 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Allison Dwyer Emory, Grace C. Sementilli
{"title":"Surveilling system exposure and parental institutional disengagement","authors":"Allison Dwyer Emory,&nbsp;Grace C. Sementilli","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We analyze the degree to which parents' direct and vicarious exposure to the Criminal Justice System (CJS), Child Support Enforcement (CSE), and Child Protective Services (CPS) is associated with disengagement from formal institutions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Exposure to social control systems is pervasive in the US, disproportionately impacting socioeconomically disadvantaged families and communities of color. While links between CJS exposure and institutional disengagement are well established, similar features of CSE and CPS contact provide strong theoretical reasons to anticipate similar associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from both mothers and fathers in the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study, we conducted a series of multivariate regressions to model institutional disengagement as a function of prior recent contact with the CJS, CSE, and CPS. Models incorporate both direct and vicarious contact and stratify by parental coresidence to capture implications for family systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We find evidence of greater institutional disengagement among parents with direct CJS involvement, fathers at risk of CSE contact, and mothers with CPS exposure. While fathers' recent conviction or incarceration was linked with maternal institutional disengagement, we find no such associations with vicarious system contact among fathers, nor for the two other forms of system contact.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study expands the robust literature identifying how CJS involvement reshapes engagement with a wide range of other institutions, suggesting that contact with other systems with the authority to surveil and punish may similarly disrupt how families navigate institutions and secure important resources.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 5","pages":"1925-1946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We analyze the degree to which parents' direct and vicarious exposure to the Criminal Justice System (CJS), Child Support Enforcement (CSE), and Child Protective Services (CPS) is associated with disengagement from formal institutions.

Background

Exposure to social control systems is pervasive in the US, disproportionately impacting socioeconomically disadvantaged families and communities of color. While links between CJS exposure and institutional disengagement are well established, similar features of CSE and CPS contact provide strong theoretical reasons to anticipate similar associations.

Method

Using data from both mothers and fathers in the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study, we conducted a series of multivariate regressions to model institutional disengagement as a function of prior recent contact with the CJS, CSE, and CPS. Models incorporate both direct and vicarious contact and stratify by parental coresidence to capture implications for family systems.

Results

We find evidence of greater institutional disengagement among parents with direct CJS involvement, fathers at risk of CSE contact, and mothers with CPS exposure. While fathers' recent conviction or incarceration was linked with maternal institutional disengagement, we find no such associations with vicarious system contact among fathers, nor for the two other forms of system contact.

Conclusion

This study expands the robust literature identifying how CJS involvement reshapes engagement with a wide range of other institutions, suggesting that contact with other systems with the authority to surveil and punish may similarly disrupt how families navigate institutions and secure important resources.

Abstract Image

监控系统曝光和家长机构脱离接触
目的分析父母直接或间接接触刑事司法系统(CJS)、儿童抚养执法(CSE)和儿童保护服务(CPS)与脱离正规机构的关系。在美国,社会控制系统的影响是普遍存在的,对社会经济上处于不利地位的家庭和有色人种社区的影响尤为严重。虽然CJS暴露与机构脱离之间的联系已经确立,但CSE和CPS接触的相似特征为预测类似关联提供了强有力的理论依据。方法使用来自父母的数据,在未来的家庭和儿童福利研究中,我们进行了一系列的多元回归来模拟机构脱离作为最近与CJS, CSE和CPS接触的函数。模型包括直接接触和间接接触,并通过父母共同居住进行分层,以捕捉对家庭系统的影响。结果我们发现有证据表明,在直接参与CJS的父母、有接触CSE风险的父亲和接触过CPS的母亲中,机构脱离的程度更高。虽然父亲最近的定罪或监禁与母亲的机构脱离有关,但我们发现父亲之间的替代系统联系没有这种联系,也没有其他两种形式的系统联系。本研究扩展了现有的文献,确定了CJS的参与如何重塑了与其他广泛机构的接触,表明与其他具有监督和惩罚权力的系统的接触可能同样会破坏家庭在机构中的导航和获取重要资源的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信