Regulating at the AI frontier: The collision of policy, regulation, and nursing practice

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Benjamin J. Galatzan PhD, RN , Elizabeth A. Johnson PhD, MS-CRM, RN , Meghan Reading Turchioe PhD, MPH, RN, FAHA , Christina Baker PhD, RN, NCSN, NI-BC , Ann Wieben PhD, RN
{"title":"Regulating at the AI frontier: The collision of policy, regulation, and nursing practice","authors":"Benjamin J. Galatzan PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Johnson PhD, MS-CRM, RN ,&nbsp;Meghan Reading Turchioe PhD, MPH, RN, FAHA ,&nbsp;Christina Baker PhD, RN, NCSN, NI-BC ,&nbsp;Ann Wieben PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.jnr.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming clinical decision-making and healthcare delivery, yet state-level legislation addressing AI integration in patient care often lacks alignment with nursing-specific regulatory frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This policy analysis examines enacted and proposed AI-related legislation across the United States, with specific attention on implications for nursing practice, licensure, and professional accountability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods/Results</h3><div>Using a structured review and thematic categorization of state legislation, eight major policy domains were identified, such as “AI in Clinical Decision-Making,” “Nursing Scope-of-Practice or Autonomy Protections,” and “AI Governance via Task Forces or Commissions.” While development of state-level AI policy is gaining momentum, few legislative efforts explicitly define nursing roles, responsibilities, or protections within AI-integrated environments. Furthermore, the majority of proposals addressing nursing autonomy are pending rather than enacted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight a growing regulatory gap that may expose nurses to increased liability, ambiguous role expectations, and reduced clinical authority in AI-augmented care settings. Key AI policy and regulatory priorities for the nursing profession focus on competencies in nursing education, updated licensure frameworks, and structured approaches for boards of nursing to assess disciplinary concerns arising from AI use. Foundational insights for nursing organizations seeking to proactively engage with AI policy development and ensure safe, ethical nursing practice in the digital era are provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 207-215"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825625001012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming clinical decision-making and healthcare delivery, yet state-level legislation addressing AI integration in patient care often lacks alignment with nursing-specific regulatory frameworks.

Purpose

This policy analysis examines enacted and proposed AI-related legislation across the United States, with specific attention on implications for nursing practice, licensure, and professional accountability.

Methods/Results

Using a structured review and thematic categorization of state legislation, eight major policy domains were identified, such as “AI in Clinical Decision-Making,” “Nursing Scope-of-Practice or Autonomy Protections,” and “AI Governance via Task Forces or Commissions.” While development of state-level AI policy is gaining momentum, few legislative efforts explicitly define nursing roles, responsibilities, or protections within AI-integrated environments. Furthermore, the majority of proposals addressing nursing autonomy are pending rather than enacted.

Conclusion

These findings highlight a growing regulatory gap that may expose nurses to increased liability, ambiguous role expectations, and reduced clinical authority in AI-augmented care settings. Key AI policy and regulatory priorities for the nursing profession focus on competencies in nursing education, updated licensure frameworks, and structured approaches for boards of nursing to assess disciplinary concerns arising from AI use. Foundational insights for nursing organizations seeking to proactively engage with AI policy development and ensure safe, ethical nursing practice in the digital era are provided.
人工智能前沿的监管:政策、监管和护理实践的碰撞
人工智能(AI)正在迅速改变临床决策和医疗保健服务,但涉及人工智能在患者护理中的整合的州级立法往往缺乏与护理特定监管框架的一致性。本政策分析考察了美国各地颁布和提议的人工智能相关立法,特别关注对护理实践、执照和专业问责制的影响。方法/结果通过对州立法进行结构化审查和专题分类,确定了八个主要政策领域,如“临床决策中的人工智能”、“护理实践范围或自主保护”和“通过工作组或委员会进行人工智能治理”。虽然国家级人工智能政策的发展势头正在增强,但很少有立法努力明确定义人工智能集成环境中的护理角色、责任或保护。此外,大多数关于护理自主权的建议都悬而未决,而不是颁布。这些发现突出了监管差距的扩大,这可能使护士在人工智能增强的护理环境中承担更多的责任,角色期望模糊,临床权威降低。护理专业的关键人工智能政策和监管重点关注护理教育的能力、更新的执照框架以及护理委员会评估人工智能使用引起的纪律问题的结构化方法。为寻求积极参与人工智能政策制定并确保数字时代安全、道德的护理实践的护理组织提供了基本见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信