{"title":"A Multicenter, Retrospective, Real-World Study of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Older Patients With NSCLC","authors":"Kensuke Kanaoka MD , Kinnosuke Matsumoto MD , Takayuki Shiroyama MD, PhD , Akihiro Tsukaguchi MD , Nao Shoshihara MD , Koki Moritomo MD , Yuhei Kinehara MD, PhD , Yasuhiro Mihashi MD , Tomoki Kuge MD , Midori Yoneda MD , Soichiro Kato MD , Keijiro Yamauchi MD , Hirotomo Machiyama MD , Yuki Nishikawa MD , Osamu Morimura MD, PhD , Akito Miyazaki MD , Kiyohide Komuta MD , Kouji Azuma MD , Satoshi Tanaka MD , Toshie Niki MD, PhD , Atsushi Kumanogoh MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Evidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy for older patients with NSCLC is limited. This real-world study compared the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (ACT) with those of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (PCT) for older patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicenter, retrospective study included 288 patients 65 years or older with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC who received PCT or ACT as first-line treatment at 13 institutions in Japan. After one-to-one propensity score matching, overall survival (OS), the incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, and all-grade pneumonitis of the PCT and ACT groups were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After propensity score matching, 54 patients were included in each of the groups. OS did not significantly differ between the PCT and ACT groups. The median OS was 16.6 months for both groups. Compared with the PCT group, the ACT group had a hazard ratio of 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68–1.74; <em>p</em> = 0.7). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 40.7% and 33.3% of patients in the PCT and ACT groups, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.55). The incidence of treatment-related pneumonitis of the PCT group was significantly higher (29.6%, including 11 grade ≥3 cases) than that of the ACT group (5.6%, including two grade ≥3 cases) (<em>p</em> = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ACT may be associated with a more favorable safety profile than that of PCT for the Japanese population; therefore, ACT could be considered a treatment option for older patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364325001080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Evidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy for older patients with NSCLC is limited. This real-world study compared the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (ACT) with those of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (PCT) for older patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.
Methods
This multicenter, retrospective study included 288 patients 65 years or older with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC who received PCT or ACT as first-line treatment at 13 institutions in Japan. After one-to-one propensity score matching, overall survival (OS), the incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, and all-grade pneumonitis of the PCT and ACT groups were compared.
Results
After propensity score matching, 54 patients were included in each of the groups. OS did not significantly differ between the PCT and ACT groups. The median OS was 16.6 months for both groups. Compared with the PCT group, the ACT group had a hazard ratio of 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68–1.74; p = 0.7). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 40.7% and 33.3% of patients in the PCT and ACT groups, respectively (p = 0.55). The incidence of treatment-related pneumonitis of the PCT group was significantly higher (29.6%, including 11 grade ≥3 cases) than that of the ACT group (5.6%, including two grade ≥3 cases) (p = 0.002).
Conclusions
ACT may be associated with a more favorable safety profile than that of PCT for the Japanese population; therefore, ACT could be considered a treatment option for older patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.