Giorgi Sabakhtarishvili MD, Mitchell B. Karpman PhD, Rahul Mishra MD, Teresa M. Putscher RN, BSN, Omer Bajwa MD, Rachel Hall DO, MS, Sahil Garg MD, Farshid Fargahi MD, Barry Meisenberg MD
{"title":"A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study of Lung Cancer Screening Outcomes Among U.S. Blacks and Whites","authors":"Giorgi Sabakhtarishvili MD, Mitchell B. Karpman PhD, Rahul Mishra MD, Teresa M. Putscher RN, BSN, Omer Bajwa MD, Rachel Hall DO, MS, Sahil Garg MD, Farshid Fargahi MD, Barry Meisenberg MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Mortality from lung cancer is reduced with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening in high-risk persons. But screening uptake is low, especially among Black persons. Previous reports of LDCT had low participation of Black persons, which may inhibit wider adoption. In this study, we report on outcomes of LDCT screening in Black and White cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective observational cohort study using concurrent data from LDCT screening and tumor registries to compare the results of LDCT efficacy in reducing stage 4 lung cancer presentations in Black and White participant cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Blacks comprised 13% of the 3647 unique eligible LDCT participants who had at least one LDCT. No statistically significant differences in LDCT category 4 were noted after screening. Lung cancers were diagnosed in 16 out of 466 (3.4%) Black LDCT participants and in 119 out of 3181 (3.7%) White LDCT participants. Black LDCT screening participants were 5.4 times less likely to be diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancers if diagnosed through screening compared to “usual care” (13% versus 44%, <em>p</em> <0.02). White LDCT participants were 3.5 times less likely to present with stage 4 lung cancer if diagnosed through screening compared to usual care (13% versus 35%, <em>p</em> < 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LDCT reduced the number of stage 4 presentations in both cohorts. These findings should encourage attempts to increase LDCT utilization in all populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 11","pages":"Article 100899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364325001171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Mortality from lung cancer is reduced with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening in high-risk persons. But screening uptake is low, especially among Black persons. Previous reports of LDCT had low participation of Black persons, which may inhibit wider adoption. In this study, we report on outcomes of LDCT screening in Black and White cohorts.
Methods
Retrospective observational cohort study using concurrent data from LDCT screening and tumor registries to compare the results of LDCT efficacy in reducing stage 4 lung cancer presentations in Black and White participant cohorts.
Results
Blacks comprised 13% of the 3647 unique eligible LDCT participants who had at least one LDCT. No statistically significant differences in LDCT category 4 were noted after screening. Lung cancers were diagnosed in 16 out of 466 (3.4%) Black LDCT participants and in 119 out of 3181 (3.7%) White LDCT participants. Black LDCT screening participants were 5.4 times less likely to be diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancers if diagnosed through screening compared to “usual care” (13% versus 44%, p <0.02). White LDCT participants were 3.5 times less likely to present with stage 4 lung cancer if diagnosed through screening compared to usual care (13% versus 35%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
LDCT reduced the number of stage 4 presentations in both cohorts. These findings should encourage attempts to increase LDCT utilization in all populations.