Intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections in patients with increased peri-facet MRI STIR signal. A prospective, multi-center case series

Joshua Levin , Kevin Barrette , Cyrus Ghaffari , Reza Ehsanian , Jayme Koltsov , Christina Giacomazzi , Nitin Prabhakar , Lisa Huynh , Matthew Smuck , William Summers , Byron Schneider
{"title":"Intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections in patients with increased peri-facet MRI STIR signal. A prospective, multi-center case series","authors":"Joshua Levin ,&nbsp;Kevin Barrette ,&nbsp;Cyrus Ghaffari ,&nbsp;Reza Ehsanian ,&nbsp;Jayme Koltsov ,&nbsp;Christina Giacomazzi ,&nbsp;Nitin Prabhakar ,&nbsp;Lisa Huynh ,&nbsp;Matthew Smuck ,&nbsp;William Summers ,&nbsp;Byron Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections are commonly performed, yet studies demonstrating benefit are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate success rates of intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections in patients with increased peri-facet edema as demonstrated by MRI with STIR sequences.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Preliminary, prospective, multi-center case series.</div></div><div><h3>Patient sample</h3><div>Thirty-three patients from three independent spine centers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients were enrolled with axial neck pain and peri-facet joint edema on MRI with STIR sequences when undergoing intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections. Outcomes were prospectively collected at 2-4-weeks and at 3-months post-injection. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with at least 50 % improvement in the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score. Neck disability index (NDI) and global perception of change (GPC) were evaluated as secondary outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 2-4-weeks post-injection, 64 % [95 %CI: 46–79 %] of the 28 patients with follow-up data met criteria for success (≥50 % improvement in NRS). 86 % [95 %CI: 69–94 %] reported that they were better or much better on the GPC, and mean NDI improved from 19.3 to 8.9. At 3-months post-injection, 35 % [95 %CI: 19–54 %] of the 26 patients with follow-up data met criteria for success, and 50 % [95 %CI: 32–68 %] reported that they were better or much better on the GPC. Mean NDI at 3-months was 11.0.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections may provide short-term relief of neck pain in patients with peri-facet edema as demonstrated by MRI with STIR sequences. Intermediate-term results are less encouraging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594425001074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections are commonly performed, yet studies demonstrating benefit are limited.

Purpose

To evaluate success rates of intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections in patients with increased peri-facet edema as demonstrated by MRI with STIR sequences.

Study design

Preliminary, prospective, multi-center case series.

Patient sample

Thirty-three patients from three independent spine centers.

Methods

Consecutive patients were enrolled with axial neck pain and peri-facet joint edema on MRI with STIR sequences when undergoing intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections. Outcomes were prospectively collected at 2-4-weeks and at 3-months post-injection. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with at least 50 % improvement in the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score. Neck disability index (NDI) and global perception of change (GPC) were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

Results

At 2-4-weeks post-injection, 64 % [95 %CI: 46–79 %] of the 28 patients with follow-up data met criteria for success (≥50 % improvement in NRS). 86 % [95 %CI: 69–94 %] reported that they were better or much better on the GPC, and mean NDI improved from 19.3 to 8.9. At 3-months post-injection, 35 % [95 %CI: 19–54 %] of the 26 patients with follow-up data met criteria for success, and 50 % [95 %CI: 32–68 %] reported that they were better or much better on the GPC. Mean NDI at 3-months was 11.0.

Conclusions

Intra-articular cervical facet joint corticosteroid injections may provide short-term relief of neck pain in patients with peri-facet edema as demonstrated by MRI with STIR sequences. Intermediate-term results are less encouraging.
关节内颈椎小关节关节皮质类固醇注射患者小关节周围MRI STIR信号增高。前瞻性,多中心病例系列
背景:经关节颈小面关节皮质类固醇注射是常用的治疗方法,但证明其益处的研究有限。目的通过MRI STIR序列分析,评价关节内注射皮质类固醇治疗关节突周围水肿患者的成功率。研究设计:初步、前瞻性、多中心病例系列。患者样本来自三个独立脊柱中心的33例患者。方法采用MRI STIR序列对颈椎小关节关节内注射皮质类固醇后出现轴性颈痛和小关节周围水肿的患者进行连续研究。在注射后2-4周和3个月前瞻性收集结果。主要结局是数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分改善至少50%的患者比例。颈部残疾指数(NDI)和整体感知变化(GPC)作为次要结局进行评估。结果注射后2-4周,随访数据的28例患者中有64% [95% CI: 46 ~ 79%]符合成功标准(NRS改善≥50%)。86% [95% CI: 69 - 94%]的患者报告GPC较好或较好,平均NDI从19.3提高到8.9。注射后3个月,26例随访数据患者中有35% [95% CI: 19 - 54%]符合成功标准,50% [95% CI: 32 - 68%]报告他们的GPC更好或更好。3个月时平均NDI为11.0。结论MRI STIR序列显示,关节内注射皮质类固醇可短期缓解关节面周围水肿患者的颈部疼痛。中期结果就不那么令人鼓舞了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信