Measuring indigenous household resilience to global environmental changes: Psychometrics and face validity scale development

IF 3.6
Shanondora Billiot , Chao-Kai Huang , Nidia Hernandez , Jessica Elm , Balakrishnan Balachandran , Jasmine Fournier
{"title":"Measuring indigenous household resilience to global environmental changes: Psychometrics and face validity scale development","authors":"Shanondora Billiot ,&nbsp;Chao-Kai Huang ,&nbsp;Nidia Hernandez ,&nbsp;Jessica Elm ,&nbsp;Balakrishnan Balachandran ,&nbsp;Jasmine Fournier","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study developed the factor structure of an Indigenous Household Resilience Scale (IHRS) within a state-recognized tribal community facing extreme environmental threats. The IHRS assesses Indigenous people's subjective appraisal of resilience at the household level, which is crucial as decisions such as relocation due to repeated disasters and chronic land loss occur at this level rather than at individual or community levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed a Tribally led participatory sequential mixed-methods approach. We collected survey data from tribal citizens (<em>N</em> = 119) along the Gulf Coast. Initial scale development involved a literature review, face validity, and community engagement, resulting in 17 indicators across three constructs. Researchers followed collaborative protocols and received appropriate institutional approvals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Guided by a series of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), item reduction and restructuring led to an 11-item scale into three factors: Cultural Continuity, Relational Place-based Worldview, and Community Engagement. The adjusted CFA model demonstrated good fit indices (a non-significant χ<sup>2</sup> test; RMSEA = 0.05; CFI = 0.94; SRMR = 0.06), with moderate to strong inter-factor correlations (ranging from 0.62 to 0.71), supporting construct distinctiveness. The overall scale showed acceptable internal consistency (ω = 0.80).</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>These findings provide preliminary evidence for measuring household resilience within an Indigenous community and contribute to Indigenous scholarship. This scale is particularly relevant for social and behavioral health practitioners and researchers working with Indigenous peoples who face environmental challenges, as it enhances culturally sensitive coping strategies and identifies factors promoting resilience at the household level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100489"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278225000653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study developed the factor structure of an Indigenous Household Resilience Scale (IHRS) within a state-recognized tribal community facing extreme environmental threats. The IHRS assesses Indigenous people's subjective appraisal of resilience at the household level, which is crucial as decisions such as relocation due to repeated disasters and chronic land loss occur at this level rather than at individual or community levels.

Methods

This study employed a Tribally led participatory sequential mixed-methods approach. We collected survey data from tribal citizens (N = 119) along the Gulf Coast. Initial scale development involved a literature review, face validity, and community engagement, resulting in 17 indicators across three constructs. Researchers followed collaborative protocols and received appropriate institutional approvals.

Results

Guided by a series of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), item reduction and restructuring led to an 11-item scale into three factors: Cultural Continuity, Relational Place-based Worldview, and Community Engagement. The adjusted CFA model demonstrated good fit indices (a non-significant χ2 test; RMSEA = 0.05; CFI = 0.94; SRMR = 0.06), with moderate to strong inter-factor correlations (ranging from 0.62 to 0.71), supporting construct distinctiveness. The overall scale showed acceptable internal consistency (ω = 0.80).

Implications

These findings provide preliminary evidence for measuring household resilience within an Indigenous community and contribute to Indigenous scholarship. This scale is particularly relevant for social and behavioral health practitioners and researchers working with Indigenous peoples who face environmental challenges, as it enhances culturally sensitive coping strategies and identifies factors promoting resilience at the household level.
测量本地家庭对全球环境变化的弹性:心理测量学和面孔效度量表的开发
本研究在一个面临极端环境威胁的国家承认的部落社区中开发了土著家庭弹性量表(IHRS)的因素结构。IHRS评估了土著人民在家庭一级对恢复力的主观评价,这是至关重要的,因为诸如由于反复发生的灾害和长期土地流失而进行的搬迁等决定是在家庭一级而不是在个人或社区一级作出的。方法本研究采用部落主导的参与式顺序混合方法。我们收集了墨西哥湾沿岸部落居民(N = 119)的调查数据。最初的量表开发包括文献回顾、面孔效度和社区参与,总共有17个指标跨越三个构式。研究人员遵循合作协议并获得适当的机构批准。结果在探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)的指导下,项目减少和重组将11个项目的量表分为三个因素:文化连续性、关系地为基础的世界观和社区参与。调整后的CFA模型显示出良好的拟合指数(无显著性χ2检验;RMSEA = 0.05; CFI = 0.94; SRMR = 0.06),具有中等至强的因子间相关性(范围为0.62至0.71),支持结构的显著性。整体量表显示可接受的内部一致性(ω = 0.80)。这些发现为衡量土著社区内的家庭弹性提供了初步证据,并有助于土著学术研究。该量表与社会和行为健康从业人员以及与面临环境挑战的土著人民一起工作的研究人员特别相关,因为它加强了具有文化敏感性的应对战略,并确定了在家庭一级促进复原力的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信