Health professional and public perspectives on environmentally sustainable healthcare in Trinidad and Tobago

IF 3.6
Loren De Freitas , Damion Basdeo , Amanda Seepersad , Andre Francis , Han-I Wang
{"title":"Health professional and public perspectives on environmentally sustainable healthcare in Trinidad and Tobago","authors":"Loren De Freitas ,&nbsp;Damion Basdeo ,&nbsp;Amanda Seepersad ,&nbsp;Andre Francis ,&nbsp;Han-I Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Strategies for environmentally sustainable healthcare may be informed by considering key perspectives on how the health sector contributes to climate change in the Caribbean. This study assessed the views of health professionals (HP) and general adult public population (PP) on environmentally sustainable healthcare in Trinidad and Tobago (T&amp;T).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional design with a self-administered online survey was used to collect data from participants through convenience sampling. Descriptive statistics summarized the characteristics of the study population and survey responses were based on unweighted data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 799 eligible responses, 52 % were PP and 48 % were HP. Most participants only had some knowledge of the topic (HP 41 %, PP 32 %). Both groups reported practicing general sustainable behaviors more frequently outside of work than at work (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Both groups prioritized energy efficiency measures for sustainable healthcare, including optimizing energy use in healthcare facilities (HP: 88.8 %; PP: 87.4 %) and utilizing renewable energy sources (HP: 85.2 %; PP: 82.9 %). Barriers for HPs included insufficient support from colleagues (65.5 %) and limited knowledge/skills (57.1 %). Factors encouraging sustainability practices included understanding how it fit into professional roles (74 %), benefits to the wellbeing/health of patients (70.9 %), public (68.1 %) and personal (62.9 %), as well as, financial savings (61.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although there was limited knowledge among participants on environmentally sustainable healthcare in T&amp;T, participants were concerned about the environmental impact of the health sector and were willing to learn more. Addressing barriers and equipping HP with necessary knowledge and support to practice sustainability in the health sector may require a multidisciplinary approach with emphasis on education and awareness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100587"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278225000902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Strategies for environmentally sustainable healthcare may be informed by considering key perspectives on how the health sector contributes to climate change in the Caribbean. This study assessed the views of health professionals (HP) and general adult public population (PP) on environmentally sustainable healthcare in Trinidad and Tobago (T&T).

Methods

A cross-sectional design with a self-administered online survey was used to collect data from participants through convenience sampling. Descriptive statistics summarized the characteristics of the study population and survey responses were based on unweighted data.

Results

Of 799 eligible responses, 52 % were PP and 48 % were HP. Most participants only had some knowledge of the topic (HP 41 %, PP 32 %). Both groups reported practicing general sustainable behaviors more frequently outside of work than at work (p < 0.05). Both groups prioritized energy efficiency measures for sustainable healthcare, including optimizing energy use in healthcare facilities (HP: 88.8 %; PP: 87.4 %) and utilizing renewable energy sources (HP: 85.2 %; PP: 82.9 %). Barriers for HPs included insufficient support from colleagues (65.5 %) and limited knowledge/skills (57.1 %). Factors encouraging sustainability practices included understanding how it fit into professional roles (74 %), benefits to the wellbeing/health of patients (70.9 %), public (68.1 %) and personal (62.9 %), as well as, financial savings (61.3 %).

Conclusion

Although there was limited knowledge among participants on environmentally sustainable healthcare in T&T, participants were concerned about the environmental impact of the health sector and were willing to learn more. Addressing barriers and equipping HP with necessary knowledge and support to practice sustainability in the health sector may require a multidisciplinary approach with emphasis on education and awareness.
卫生专业人员和公众对特立尼达和多巴哥环境可持续保健的看法
通过考虑卫生部门如何促进加勒比气候变化的关键观点,可以为环境可持续的卫生保健战略提供信息。本研究评估了特立尼达和多巴哥(T&;T)卫生专业人员(HP)和普通成年公众(PP)对环境可持续卫生保健的看法。方法采用横断面设计,自行在线调查,方便抽样。描述性统计总结了研究人群的特征,调查结果基于未加权的数据。结果在799例符合条件的应答中,52%为PP, 48%为HP。大多数参与者对这个话题只有一些了解(惠普41%,PP 32%)。两组人都报告说,在工作之外比在工作中更频繁地实践一般的可持续行为(p < 0.05)。两组优先考虑可持续医疗保健的能源效率措施,包括优化医疗保健设施的能源使用(惠普:88.8%;PP: 87.4%)和利用可再生能源(惠普:85.2%;PP: 82.9%)。HPs的障碍包括同事支持不足(65.5%)和知识/技能有限(57.1%)。鼓励可持续性实践的因素包括理解它如何适合专业角色(74%),对患者的福利/健康(70.9%),公众(68.1%)和个人(62.9%)的好处,以及财务节省(61.3%)。结论虽然参与者对环境可持续医疗保健的了解有限,但参与者关注卫生部门对环境的影响,并愿意了解更多。解决障碍并为卫生保健部门的可持续性实践提供必要的知识和支持,可能需要采用多学科方法,重点放在教育和认识上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信