Learning from caregivers: Insights into pediatric speech and language services delivered via telepractice during COVID-19

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106577
Caitlin Fromm , Meaghan McKenna
{"title":"Learning from caregivers: Insights into pediatric speech and language services delivered via telepractice during COVID-19","authors":"Caitlin Fromm ,&nbsp;Meaghan McKenna","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article describes the development and administration of the <em>Caregiver Insights of Pediatric Speech and Language Services Delivered via Telepractice During COVID-19</em> survey. Caregivers of children who began receiving speech and/or language services delivered via telepractice during COVID-19 were recruited to participate in this study. Participants were invited to share their impressions of telepractice during COVID-19 and why they chose to continue or discontinue this service delivery model when a return to in-person therapy became possible. This survey was developed using procedures outlined by the commonly accepted stages of questionnaire development. This process establishes content validity through: (a) identification of the survey purpose, (b) creation of an item blueprint, (c) expert panel review, and (d) interviews with end-users (i.e., parents, caregivers). Dissemination of the survey occurred through social media and field-specific forums. Sixty caregivers participated. Findings from the 35 items were analyzed using descriptive statistics and consensual qualitative research. We found that caregivers' levels of satisfaction regarding telepractice services varied. When given the option to return to in person services post-pandemic, some participants continued telepractice due to convenience and the expertise of the therapist, while others discontinued due to their child’s lack of engagement. Caregivers identified successes as the presence and participation of a family member, comfortability in one’s own home, and accessibility; whereas barriers such as lack of session materials, technology, and difficulty understanding directions led some to return to in-person services. These findings identify advantages and disadvantages of this service delivery model when selecting the best therapy environment for a child, as well as training topics for ongoing advancements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 106577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199242500084X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes the development and administration of the Caregiver Insights of Pediatric Speech and Language Services Delivered via Telepractice During COVID-19 survey. Caregivers of children who began receiving speech and/or language services delivered via telepractice during COVID-19 were recruited to participate in this study. Participants were invited to share their impressions of telepractice during COVID-19 and why they chose to continue or discontinue this service delivery model when a return to in-person therapy became possible. This survey was developed using procedures outlined by the commonly accepted stages of questionnaire development. This process establishes content validity through: (a) identification of the survey purpose, (b) creation of an item blueprint, (c) expert panel review, and (d) interviews with end-users (i.e., parents, caregivers). Dissemination of the survey occurred through social media and field-specific forums. Sixty caregivers participated. Findings from the 35 items were analyzed using descriptive statistics and consensual qualitative research. We found that caregivers' levels of satisfaction regarding telepractice services varied. When given the option to return to in person services post-pandemic, some participants continued telepractice due to convenience and the expertise of the therapist, while others discontinued due to their child’s lack of engagement. Caregivers identified successes as the presence and participation of a family member, comfortability in one’s own home, and accessibility; whereas barriers such as lack of session materials, technology, and difficulty understanding directions led some to return to in-person services. These findings identify advantages and disadvantages of this service delivery model when selecting the best therapy environment for a child, as well as training topics for ongoing advancements.
向护理人员学习:洞察COVID-19期间通过远程实践提供的儿科语音和语言服务
本文描述了在COVID-19调查期间通过远程实践提供的儿童语音和语言服务的护理人员见解的开发和管理。招募在COVID-19期间开始接受通过远程实践提供的语音和/或语言服务的儿童的照顾者参加本研究。与会者被邀请分享他们在2019冠状病毒病疫情期间对远程医疗的印象,以及当有可能恢复面对面治疗时,他们选择继续或停止这种服务提供模式的原因。这项调查是根据问卷开发的普遍接受阶段概述的程序开发的。该过程通过以下方式建立内容效度:(a)确定调查目的,(b)创建项目蓝图,(c)专家小组评审,以及(d)与最终用户(即父母、看护人)的访谈。调查通过社交媒体和特定领域论坛进行传播。60名护理人员参与了研究。使用描述性统计和共识性定性研究对35个项目的调查结果进行了分析。我们发现护理人员对远程医疗服务的满意度各不相同。当大流行后可以选择返回亲自服务时,一些参与者由于方便和治疗师的专业知识而继续远程实践,而另一些参与者则由于其孩子缺乏参与而停止。照顾者认为成功的条件是有家庭成员在场和参与,在自己家里的舒适程度和可及性;然而,缺乏治疗材料、技术和难以理解指导等障碍导致一些人回到面对面的服务。在为儿童选择最佳治疗环境时,这些发现确定了这种服务提供模式的优点和缺点,以及持续发展的培训主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书