The (Un)sustainability of the Metaverse: A topic modeling analysis of social, economic, and environmental impacts

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Francesca Iandolo , Antonio La Sala , Giuliano Maielli , Pietro Vito
{"title":"The (Un)sustainability of the Metaverse: A topic modeling analysis of social, economic, and environmental impacts","authors":"Francesca Iandolo ,&nbsp;Antonio La Sala ,&nbsp;Giuliano Maielli ,&nbsp;Pietro Vito","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article investigates the multifaceted interplay between sustainability and the Metaverse within the wider academic literature. Drawing on a corpus of 236 peer-reviewed publications retrieved from a leading scientific database, we employ an unsupervised topic modeling technique to identify the latent thematic architecture of current research. Our analysis reveals nine distinct yet overlapping clusters, encompassing domains such as technological adoption, digital transformation, ethics and governance, privacy, and cultural immersion. Across these thematic areas, sustainability often emerges as a secondary or derivative concern, frequently subordinated to questions of functionality, adoption, or user experience, rather than being treated as a structural or systemic imperative. To address this conceptual fragmentation, we introduce an integrated theoretical framework that synthesizes the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, the relational-material lens of Digital Ecologies, and the normative triad of the Technology–Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability Theory (T-EESST). This framework is further enriched by a transversal engagement with the temporal dynamics of time compression, a phenomenon that remains largely absent in the literature despite its far-reaching implications for organizational viability, psychological well-being, and socio-economic equity. Our findings suggest that the Metaverse must be reconceptualized not merely as a technological platform or experiential interface, but as a complex, socio-technical regime embedded within evolving temporal, institutional, and ecological structures. We contend that a sustainable Metaverse requires more than technical optimization or ethical design; it demands interdisciplinary inquiry capable of integrating spatial, social, and temporal dimensions of digital life. The study concludes by outlining a future research agenda aimed at bridging current epistemic silos and promoting the emergence of a truly systemic understanding of the (un)sustainability of the Metaverse.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103095"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002854","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the multifaceted interplay between sustainability and the Metaverse within the wider academic literature. Drawing on a corpus of 236 peer-reviewed publications retrieved from a leading scientific database, we employ an unsupervised topic modeling technique to identify the latent thematic architecture of current research. Our analysis reveals nine distinct yet overlapping clusters, encompassing domains such as technological adoption, digital transformation, ethics and governance, privacy, and cultural immersion. Across these thematic areas, sustainability often emerges as a secondary or derivative concern, frequently subordinated to questions of functionality, adoption, or user experience, rather than being treated as a structural or systemic imperative. To address this conceptual fragmentation, we introduce an integrated theoretical framework that synthesizes the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, the relational-material lens of Digital Ecologies, and the normative triad of the Technology–Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability Theory (T-EESST). This framework is further enriched by a transversal engagement with the temporal dynamics of time compression, a phenomenon that remains largely absent in the literature despite its far-reaching implications for organizational viability, psychological well-being, and socio-economic equity. Our findings suggest that the Metaverse must be reconceptualized not merely as a technological platform or experiential interface, but as a complex, socio-technical regime embedded within evolving temporal, institutional, and ecological structures. We contend that a sustainable Metaverse requires more than technical optimization or ethical design; it demands interdisciplinary inquiry capable of integrating spatial, social, and temporal dimensions of digital life. The study concludes by outlining a future research agenda aimed at bridging current epistemic silos and promoting the emergence of a truly systemic understanding of the (un)sustainability of the Metaverse.
虚拟世界的(非)可持续性:对社会、经济和环境影响的主题建模分析
本文在更广泛的学术文献中调查了可持续性与元宇宙之间的多方面相互作用。利用从一个领先的科学数据库中检索到的236个同行评审出版物的语料库,我们采用无监督主题建模技术来识别当前研究的潜在主题架构。我们的分析揭示了九个不同但又相互重叠的集群,包括技术采用、数字化转型、道德和治理、隐私和文化沉浸等领域。在这些主题领域中,可持续性往往是次要的或派生的问题,往往从属于功能、采用或用户体验的问题,而不是被视为结构或系统的必要条件。为了解决这一概念上的分裂,我们引入了一个综合了社会技术转型的多层次视角(MLP)、数字生态的关系-物质视角以及技术-环境、经济和社会可持续性理论(T-EESST)的规范性三要素的综合理论框架。这一框架通过与时间压缩的时间动态的横向接触而进一步丰富,尽管这一现象对组织生存能力、心理健康和社会经济公平有着深远的影响,但在文献中基本没有这种现象。我们的研究结果表明,虚拟世界必须被重新概念化,而不仅仅是作为一个技术平台或体验界面,而是作为一个复杂的社会技术制度,嵌入在不断发展的时间、制度和生态结构中。我们认为,可持续的元宇宙需要的不仅仅是技术优化或道德设计;它需要跨学科的探究,能够整合数字生活的空间、社会和时间维度。该研究最后概述了未来的研究议程,旨在弥合当前的认知孤岛,促进对虚拟世界(非)可持续性的真正系统理解的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信