Incorporate ecosystem services into the determination and promotion of protected areas based on multi-criteria decision-making method

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Yi Wang , Da Lü , Lichang Yin , Linhai Cheng , Xiaofeng Wang
{"title":"Incorporate ecosystem services into the determination and promotion of protected areas based on multi-criteria decision-making method","authors":"Yi Wang ,&nbsp;Da Lü ,&nbsp;Lichang Yin ,&nbsp;Linhai Cheng ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Establishing protected areas (PAs) is recognized as an effective measure to prevent ecological degradation and maintain biodiversity. The goal of 30 by 30 is ambitiously proposed in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which commits governments around the world to protect 30 % of the world's land and ocean by 2030. However, there is still a significant gap in the current PAs. As an effective guarantee of human well-being, incorporating ecosystem services (ESs) conservation into the goals of PAs is being acknowledged. How to better incorporate ESs into management decisions to balance the negative trade-offs between services is a concern when considering the benefits of PAs. The ordered weighted average algorithm (OWA) provides an effective method of providing multiple benefits simultaneously. However, we noticed that the results are highly dependent on the input. We have noticed the different results of studies in the literature. Differences may represent regional differences and come from different scales and analysis methods. In general, we suggest that selecting service types based on regional differences and redundancy of service functions, selecting a reasonable number of services based on algorithm characteristics, and calibrating model parameters based on field research to improve the accuracy of service simulation are key issues. We continue to explore what problems exist in the selection of PAs in which regions, i.e., time and space scale determination, interaction relationship analysis, and subsequent management policy formulation, to make the research more insightful and policy-relevant. We believe that this article can provide strong insights when selecting and promoting PAs from around the world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article e03863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425004640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing protected areas (PAs) is recognized as an effective measure to prevent ecological degradation and maintain biodiversity. The goal of 30 by 30 is ambitiously proposed in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which commits governments around the world to protect 30 % of the world's land and ocean by 2030. However, there is still a significant gap in the current PAs. As an effective guarantee of human well-being, incorporating ecosystem services (ESs) conservation into the goals of PAs is being acknowledged. How to better incorporate ESs into management decisions to balance the negative trade-offs between services is a concern when considering the benefits of PAs. The ordered weighted average algorithm (OWA) provides an effective method of providing multiple benefits simultaneously. However, we noticed that the results are highly dependent on the input. We have noticed the different results of studies in the literature. Differences may represent regional differences and come from different scales and analysis methods. In general, we suggest that selecting service types based on regional differences and redundancy of service functions, selecting a reasonable number of services based on algorithm characteristics, and calibrating model parameters based on field research to improve the accuracy of service simulation are key issues. We continue to explore what problems exist in the selection of PAs in which regions, i.e., time and space scale determination, interaction relationship analysis, and subsequent management policy formulation, to make the research more insightful and policy-relevant. We believe that this article can provide strong insights when selecting and promoting PAs from around the world.
基于多准则决策方法,将生态系统服务纳入保护区的确定和推广
建立自然保护区是防止生态退化和维持生物多样性的有效措施。《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》雄心勃勃地提出了“30 by 30”的目标,该框架要求世界各国政府到2030年保护世界30% %的陆地和海洋。然而,目前的PAs仍有很大的差距。作为人类福祉的有效保障,将生态系统服务保护纳入保护区的目标已得到认可。在考虑pa的好处时,如何更好地将ESs合并到管理决策中以平衡服务之间的负面权衡是一个值得关注的问题。有序加权平均算法(OWA)提供了一种同时提供多种效益的有效方法。然而,我们注意到结果高度依赖于输入。我们注意到文献中不同的研究结果。差异可能代表区域差异,来自不同的尺度和分析方法。综上所述,基于区域差异和业务功能冗余选择服务类型、基于算法特征选择合理的服务数量、基于实地调研标定模型参数以提高业务模拟精度是关键问题。我们将继续探索在哪些地区的保护区选择中存在哪些问题,即时间和空间尺度的确定、相互关系的分析以及随后的管理政策制定,以使研究更具洞察力和政策相关性。我们相信这篇文章可以为选择和推广来自世界各地的pa提供强有力的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信