Comment on ’’Revealing the early geological history of the Istanbul Zone (Far-East Avalonia) through zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopic data’’ by Yılmazer et al. (2025), Precambrian research 427, 107855
{"title":"Comment on ’’Revealing the early geological history of the Istanbul Zone (Far-East Avalonia) through zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopic data’’ by Yılmazer et al. (2025), Precambrian research 427, 107855","authors":"Fatih Şen","doi":"10.1016/j.precamres.2025.107939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Yılmazer et al. (2025) interpret a single detrital zircon U–Pb age of 530 ± 29 Ma from the Kurtköy Formation as evidence for an Upper Cambrian or younger depositional age. However, this interpretation merits re-evaluation in light of the relatively large analytical uncertainty (±5.5 %) and the absence of corroborating biostratigraphic or sedimentological evidence. Stratigraphic relationships and multiple well-defined zircon age populations (582 ± 5 Ma, 554 ± 8 Ma, and 544 ± 10 Ma) strongly support a Late Ediacaran depositional age. Additionally, the purported unconformable contact between the Kurtköy Formation and the underlying Yellice Volcanics is not supported by field observations, which instead suggest a tectonic boundary. Provenance data also indicate derivation from the nearby Yellice Arc rather than distant sources such as the Timanide Belt. An alternative interpretation of the depositional age and provenance of the Kurtköy Formation is proposed here, with broader implications for the tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the İstanbul Zone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49674,"journal":{"name":"Precambrian Research","volume":"430 ","pages":"Article 107939"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precambrian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926825002657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Yılmazer et al. (2025) interpret a single detrital zircon U–Pb age of 530 ± 29 Ma from the Kurtköy Formation as evidence for an Upper Cambrian or younger depositional age. However, this interpretation merits re-evaluation in light of the relatively large analytical uncertainty (±5.5 %) and the absence of corroborating biostratigraphic or sedimentological evidence. Stratigraphic relationships and multiple well-defined zircon age populations (582 ± 5 Ma, 554 ± 8 Ma, and 544 ± 10 Ma) strongly support a Late Ediacaran depositional age. Additionally, the purported unconformable contact between the Kurtköy Formation and the underlying Yellice Volcanics is not supported by field observations, which instead suggest a tectonic boundary. Provenance data also indicate derivation from the nearby Yellice Arc rather than distant sources such as the Timanide Belt. An alternative interpretation of the depositional age and provenance of the Kurtköy Formation is proposed here, with broader implications for the tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the İstanbul Zone.
期刊介绍:
Precambrian Research publishes studies on all aspects of the early stages of the composition, structure and evolution of the Earth and its planetary neighbours. With a focus on process-oriented and comparative studies, it covers, but is not restricted to, subjects such as:
(1) Chemical, biological, biochemical and cosmochemical evolution; the origin of life; the evolution of the oceans and atmosphere; the early fossil record; palaeobiology;
(2) Geochronology and isotope and elemental geochemistry;
(3) Precambrian mineral deposits;
(4) Geophysical aspects of the early Earth and Precambrian terrains;
(5) Nature, formation and evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere and mantle including magmatic, depositional, metamorphic and tectonic processes.
In addition, the editors particularly welcome integrated process-oriented studies that involve a combination of the above fields and comparative studies that demonstrate the effect of Precambrian evolution on Phanerozoic earth system processes.
Regional and localised studies of Precambrian phenomena are considered appropriate only when the detail and quality allow illustration of a wider process, or when significant gaps in basic knowledge of a particular area can be filled.