Elena Torres Álvarez , Michael Gracey , Mark Cowper , Quoc Tri Phung , Borys Zlobenko , Federica Pancotti , Mafalda Guerra , Märten Kala , Janno Torop , Alan H. Tkaczyk
{"title":"Advanced treatment strategies for challenging radioactive Wastes: Recent Developments and future directions","authors":"Elena Torres Álvarez , Michael Gracey , Mark Cowper , Quoc Tri Phung , Borys Zlobenko , Federica Pancotti , Mafalda Guerra , Märten Kala , Janno Torop , Alan H. Tkaczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The management of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LILW) presents increasing challenges, particularly for waste streams with complex chemistries, variable radioactivity, or combined toxic and radiological risks. Conventional treatment methods, while effective for conventional waste types, are often inadequate for these problematic streams, which require advanced and tailored approaches. This review evaluates recent progress in thermal (pyrolysis, plasma processes, fluidized bed steam reforming, molten salt oxidation) and chemical technologies (wet and electrochemical oxidation) for treating such wastes. The novelty of this work lies in its integrated analysis, which combines comparative technology mapping with assessments of scalability, regulatory and societal acceptance, and the integration of lifecycle environmental and economic metrics. Cross-technology performance matrices are presented to support process selection, together with a strategic research roadmap that prioritizes secondary waste minimization, flexible acceptance criteria, and the inclusion of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The study also highlights future trends such as mobile modular treatment systems, hybrid technologies that integrate multiple treatment approaches, and the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for real-time monitoring and process optimization. Overall, this review aims to provide a practical framework to guide researchers, industry, and regulators toward safe, sustainable, and industrially viable solutions for complex radioactive waste management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"445 ","pages":"Article 114501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325006788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The management of low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LILW) presents increasing challenges, particularly for waste streams with complex chemistries, variable radioactivity, or combined toxic and radiological risks. Conventional treatment methods, while effective for conventional waste types, are often inadequate for these problematic streams, which require advanced and tailored approaches. This review evaluates recent progress in thermal (pyrolysis, plasma processes, fluidized bed steam reforming, molten salt oxidation) and chemical technologies (wet and electrochemical oxidation) for treating such wastes. The novelty of this work lies in its integrated analysis, which combines comparative technology mapping with assessments of scalability, regulatory and societal acceptance, and the integration of lifecycle environmental and economic metrics. Cross-technology performance matrices are presented to support process selection, together with a strategic research roadmap that prioritizes secondary waste minimization, flexible acceptance criteria, and the inclusion of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The study also highlights future trends such as mobile modular treatment systems, hybrid technologies that integrate multiple treatment approaches, and the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for real-time monitoring and process optimization. Overall, this review aims to provide a practical framework to guide researchers, industry, and regulators toward safe, sustainable, and industrially viable solutions for complex radioactive waste management.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology.
Fundamentals of Reactor Design include:
• Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics
• Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA)
• Structural and Mechanical Engineering
• Materials Science
• Fuel Behavior and Design
• Structural Plant Design
• Engineering of Reactor Components
• Experiments
Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered:
• Accident Mitigation Measures
• Reactor Control Systems
• Licensing Issues
• Safeguard Engineering
• Economy of Plants
• Reprocessing / Waste Disposal
• Applications of Nuclear Energy
• Maintenance
• Decommissioning
Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.