Explainable prediction self-assessment model for potentially inappropriate prescribing risk in older adults

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Fangyuan Tian , Zhaoyan Chen , Mengnan Zhao , Rui Tang , Ying Zhang , Qiyi Feng
{"title":"Explainable prediction self-assessment model for potentially inappropriate prescribing risk in older adults","authors":"Fangyuan Tian ,&nbsp;Zhaoyan Chen ,&nbsp;Mengnan Zhao ,&nbsp;Rui Tang ,&nbsp;Ying Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiyi Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Older adults with multiple chronic conditions often face challenges of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PIP risk, aiding clinicians and patients in improving medication safety and self-management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from geriatric outpatient prescriptions in six Chinese cities were analyzed using Chinese criteria. LASSO regression identified risk variables. Three machine learning (ML) models—logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and neural network (NN)—were training and internal validation (7: 3) and external validation cohort. Model performance was assessed via area under the ROC curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values explained variable importance, and risk cutoff points were determined using the Youden index and prevalence data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 131,894 prescriptions, 29.00% (38,245) were PIP. The NN model with nonsampling performed best, with internal validation AUC of 0.759 (95%CI: 0.753 –0.764) and external validation AUC of 0.842 (95%CI: 0.816 –0.867). SHAP summary plots showed that the number of medications and sleep disorders were the most influential variables in basic prescription information and diagnoses, respectively. A predicted probability cutoff point of 29% was determined to classify low- and high-risk PIP categories. The optimal model was deployed as a web application (<span><span>https://stoppip.online/pipview</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) for clinical use, and a WeChat mini-program was developed to facilitate self-assessment of PIP risk during outpatient follow-ups or home medication use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The model was not only developed to predict PIP but can also be used by medical staff and older patients for self-assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 106137"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625003545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Older adults with multiple chronic conditions often face challenges of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PIP risk, aiding clinicians and patients in improving medication safety and self-management.

Methods

Data from geriatric outpatient prescriptions in six Chinese cities were analyzed using Chinese criteria. LASSO regression identified risk variables. Three machine learning (ML) models—logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and neural network (NN)—were training and internal validation (7: 3) and external validation cohort. Model performance was assessed via area under the ROC curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values explained variable importance, and risk cutoff points were determined using the Youden index and prevalence data.

Results

Among 131,894 prescriptions, 29.00% (38,245) were PIP. The NN model with nonsampling performed best, with internal validation AUC of 0.759 (95%CI: 0.753 –0.764) and external validation AUC of 0.842 (95%CI: 0.816 –0.867). SHAP summary plots showed that the number of medications and sleep disorders were the most influential variables in basic prescription information and diagnoses, respectively. A predicted probability cutoff point of 29% was determined to classify low- and high-risk PIP categories. The optimal model was deployed as a web application (https://stoppip.online/pipview) for clinical use, and a WeChat mini-program was developed to facilitate self-assessment of PIP risk during outpatient follow-ups or home medication use.

Conclusion

The model was not only developed to predict PIP but can also be used by medical staff and older patients for self-assessment.
老年人潜在不当处方风险的可解释预测自我评估模型
背景患有多种慢性疾病的老年人经常面临潜在不适当处方(PIP)的挑战。本研究旨在开发和验证一个可解释的机器学习(ML)模型来预测PIP风险,帮助临床医生和患者提高药物安全性和自我管理。方法采用中国标准对全国6个城市老年门诊处方数据进行分析。LASSO回归识别风险变量。三个机器学习(ML)模型-逻辑回归(LR),随机森林(RF)和神经网络(NN) -进行训练和内部验证(7:3)和外部验证队列。通过ROC曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值解释了变量的重要性,并使用约登指数和患病率数据确定了风险截断点。结果131894张处方中,使用PIP的处方占29.00%(38245张)。非采样NN模型表现最好,内部验证AUC为0.759 (95%CI: 0.753 ~ 0.764),外部验证AUC为0.842 (95%CI: 0.816 ~ 0.867)。SHAP总结图显示,药物数量和睡眠障碍分别是影响基本处方信息和诊断的最大变量。确定了29%的预测概率截断点来划分低和高风险PIP类别。将最佳模型作为web应用程序(https://stoppip.online/pipview)部署用于临床使用,并开发微信小程序,以便在门诊随访或家庭用药期间对PIP风险进行自我评估。结论该模型不仅可用于PIP的预测,而且可用于医务人员和老年患者的自我评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信