H. Rainad Khan Rohan , Md. Abidur Rahman Ishraq , Anton Evgenievich Kruglikov
{"title":"Comparative neutronic analysis of diverse seed blanket unit (SBU) concepts for the ACP-100 small modular reactor","authors":"H. Rainad Khan Rohan , Md. Abidur Rahman Ishraq , Anton Evgenievich Kruglikov","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the neutronic feasibility of diverse seed blanket unit (SBU) concepts for the ACP-100 small modular reactor using the Monte Carlo code SERPENT. Pairing four different seed fuels (UO<sub>2</sub>, UC, UN, and MOX) with three blanket materials (natural UO<sub>2</sub>, depleted UO<sub>2</sub>, and mixed ThO<sub>2</sub>-UO<sub>2</sub>), a total of twelve different SBU-utilizing core models were developed and evaluated. The results indicate that MOX fuels with depleted/natural UO<sub>2</sub> blankets are unsuitable for SBU cores as they cannot sustain prolonged core operation. Of the twelve models, eight successfully remained critical for more than one effective full power year (1 EFPY). The best performing seed/blanket compositions were UC/Th and UO<sub>2</sub>/Th with cycle lengths of 1.88 EFPY and 1.75 EFPY, and discharge burnups of 15.85 MWd/kg and 15.39 MWd/kg respectively. The discharge burnup and cycle length of UC seed paired with thorium blanket surpassed those of the reference by 7.9% and 1.6% respectively. All SBU cores achieved high conversion ratios, maintained negative fuel and moderator temperature coefficients (FTC and MTC) and had lower power peaking factors compared to the reference, indicating a more uniform power distribution. The SBU cores utilizing thorium had more negative temperature coefficients than the reference and produced less fissile plutonium (with the exception of the UN-seeded core) at the end of one year. Although a degradation in beta effective was observed, all SBU cores had sufficient control rod reactivity worth to render them subcritical at any instant during operation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"445 ","pages":"Article 114507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325006843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the neutronic feasibility of diverse seed blanket unit (SBU) concepts for the ACP-100 small modular reactor using the Monte Carlo code SERPENT. Pairing four different seed fuels (UO2, UC, UN, and MOX) with three blanket materials (natural UO2, depleted UO2, and mixed ThO2-UO2), a total of twelve different SBU-utilizing core models were developed and evaluated. The results indicate that MOX fuels with depleted/natural UO2 blankets are unsuitable for SBU cores as they cannot sustain prolonged core operation. Of the twelve models, eight successfully remained critical for more than one effective full power year (1 EFPY). The best performing seed/blanket compositions were UC/Th and UO2/Th with cycle lengths of 1.88 EFPY and 1.75 EFPY, and discharge burnups of 15.85 MWd/kg and 15.39 MWd/kg respectively. The discharge burnup and cycle length of UC seed paired with thorium blanket surpassed those of the reference by 7.9% and 1.6% respectively. All SBU cores achieved high conversion ratios, maintained negative fuel and moderator temperature coefficients (FTC and MTC) and had lower power peaking factors compared to the reference, indicating a more uniform power distribution. The SBU cores utilizing thorium had more negative temperature coefficients than the reference and produced less fissile plutonium (with the exception of the UN-seeded core) at the end of one year. Although a degradation in beta effective was observed, all SBU cores had sufficient control rod reactivity worth to render them subcritical at any instant during operation.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology.
Fundamentals of Reactor Design include:
• Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics
• Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA)
• Structural and Mechanical Engineering
• Materials Science
• Fuel Behavior and Design
• Structural Plant Design
• Engineering of Reactor Components
• Experiments
Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered:
• Accident Mitigation Measures
• Reactor Control Systems
• Licensing Issues
• Safeguard Engineering
• Economy of Plants
• Reprocessing / Waste Disposal
• Applications of Nuclear Energy
• Maintenance
• Decommissioning
Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.