Evaluating activation strategies and their stability on PEM water electrolyzers using machine learning

IF 9.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Energy and AI Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100623
K. Ashoke Raman , Niklas L. Wolf , Ali Javed , Violeta Karyofylli , Hans Kungl , André Karl , Eva Jodat , Rüdiger-A. Eichel
{"title":"Evaluating activation strategies and their stability on PEM water electrolyzers using machine learning","authors":"K. Ashoke Raman ,&nbsp;Niklas L. Wolf ,&nbsp;Ali Javed ,&nbsp;Violeta Karyofylli ,&nbsp;Hans Kungl ,&nbsp;André Karl ,&nbsp;Eva Jodat ,&nbsp;Rüdiger-A. Eichel","doi":"10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pre-treatment of the proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers is a crucial procedure performed prior to its regular operation. These procedures help in catalyst activation and membrane saturation, thereby, ensuring its optimal performance. In this study, we use machine learning to investigate the impact of three distinct activation procedures on the cell performance and stability. The data set necessary to develop the surrogate models was obtained from a lab scale PEM electrolyzer cell. After evaluating the performance of the three tested models and validating them with experimental data, extreme gradient boosting is selected as the to perform parametric analysis. The modeling predictions reveal that the activation procedures mainly impact the ohmic resistance at the beginning of the cell life. These observations were further corroborated using through sensitivity analysis performed through an explainable artificial intelligence technique. Furthermore, data-driven time-series forecasting analysis to predict cell stability for different activation procedures showed a good comparison between experimental data and model predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34138,"journal":{"name":"Energy and AI","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100623"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546825001557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-treatment of the proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers is a crucial procedure performed prior to its regular operation. These procedures help in catalyst activation and membrane saturation, thereby, ensuring its optimal performance. In this study, we use machine learning to investigate the impact of three distinct activation procedures on the cell performance and stability. The data set necessary to develop the surrogate models was obtained from a lab scale PEM electrolyzer cell. After evaluating the performance of the three tested models and validating them with experimental data, extreme gradient boosting is selected as the to perform parametric analysis. The modeling predictions reveal that the activation procedures mainly impact the ohmic resistance at the beginning of the cell life. These observations were further corroborated using through sensitivity analysis performed through an explainable artificial intelligence technique. Furthermore, data-driven time-series forecasting analysis to predict cell stability for different activation procedures showed a good comparison between experimental data and model predictions.

Abstract Image

利用机器学习评估PEM水电解槽的激活策略及其稳定性
质子交换膜水电解槽的预处理是其正常运行前的一个关键步骤。这些步骤有助于催化剂活化和膜饱和,从而确保其最佳性能。在这项研究中,我们使用机器学习来研究三种不同的激活程序对细胞性能和稳定性的影响。开发替代模型所需的数据集是从实验室规模的PEM电解槽中获得的。在对三种被测试模型的性能进行评价和实验数据验证后,选择极端梯度增强模型进行参数分析。模型预测表明,激活程序主要影响欧姆电阻在细胞寿命的开始。通过可解释的人工智能技术进行敏感性分析,进一步证实了这些观察结果。此外,数据驱动的时间序列预测分析预测了不同激活程序下细胞的稳定性,结果表明实验数据和模型预测结果具有良好的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and AI
Energy and AI Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书