Exploring the differences between five basic tastes and tasteless stimuli on brain responses in young adult males utilizing scalp electroencephalography

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Wanxiu Xu , Yunqi Zhu , Yuansheng Zhou , Siyu Liu , Bin Zhou , Weidong Jiao , Yongsheng Pei , Yonghua Jiang , Shuangxi Li , Gang Li , Yu Sun
{"title":"Exploring the differences between five basic tastes and tasteless stimuli on brain responses in young adult males utilizing scalp electroencephalography","authors":"Wanxiu Xu ,&nbsp;Yunqi Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuansheng Zhou ,&nbsp;Siyu Liu ,&nbsp;Bin Zhou ,&nbsp;Weidong Jiao ,&nbsp;Yongsheng Pei ,&nbsp;Yonghua Jiang ,&nbsp;Shuangxi Li ,&nbsp;Gang Li ,&nbsp;Yu Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Different tastes help people distinguish the nutritional content and potential harmful substances in food. Understanding the physiological and neural mechanisms of tastes, especially how the brain processes and decodes these taste signals, is essential for comprehending the nature of taste perception. This study aims to explore neural mechanisms of taste. Sixteen male university students participated, and electroencephalography (EEG) data were collected during 40 s exposures to five taste (i.e., sour, sweet, bitter, salty, umami) and one tasteless liquid stimuli. Analysis of power spectrum features for these stimuli was then conducted and quantitatively assessed. The findings reveal that the most sensitive EEG responses to taste stimuli occur in the alpha1 and alpha2 bands. Significant differences in EEG responses between taste stimuli and tasteless stimuli were observed around 1–3 s post stimulation. Notably, there is a double-hump response for alpha1 and alpha2. Temporal, occipital, and central lobes exhibited more pronounced differences. Brain topography maps revealed differences in alpha2 rhythm for the five basic tastes throughout the 1–3 s. These findings offer valuable insights into the relationship between taste perception and the brain’s detection and processing of taste stimuli, contributing substantial theoretical and practical value to fields including food science, sensory perception, and neurocognitive research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 108883"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425013941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different tastes help people distinguish the nutritional content and potential harmful substances in food. Understanding the physiological and neural mechanisms of tastes, especially how the brain processes and decodes these taste signals, is essential for comprehending the nature of taste perception. This study aims to explore neural mechanisms of taste. Sixteen male university students participated, and electroencephalography (EEG) data were collected during 40 s exposures to five taste (i.e., sour, sweet, bitter, salty, umami) and one tasteless liquid stimuli. Analysis of power spectrum features for these stimuli was then conducted and quantitatively assessed. The findings reveal that the most sensitive EEG responses to taste stimuli occur in the alpha1 and alpha2 bands. Significant differences in EEG responses between taste stimuli and tasteless stimuli were observed around 1–3 s post stimulation. Notably, there is a double-hump response for alpha1 and alpha2. Temporal, occipital, and central lobes exhibited more pronounced differences. Brain topography maps revealed differences in alpha2 rhythm for the five basic tastes throughout the 1–3 s. These findings offer valuable insights into the relationship between taste perception and the brain’s detection and processing of taste stimuli, contributing substantial theoretical and practical value to fields including food science, sensory perception, and neurocognitive research.
利用头皮脑电图探讨五种基本味觉和无味味觉刺激对年轻成年男性脑反应的差异
不同的味道可以帮助人们区分食物中的营养成分和潜在的有害物质。了解味觉的生理和神经机制,特别是大脑如何处理和解码这些味觉信号,对于理解味觉感知的本质至关重要。本研究旨在探讨味觉的神经机制。研究对象为16名男性大学生,在接受5种口味(酸、甜、苦、咸、鲜)和1种无味液体刺激的40秒内,采集脑电图数据。然后对这些刺激的功率谱特征进行分析并进行定量评估。研究结果表明,对味觉刺激最敏感的脑电图反应发生在alpha1和alpha2波段。味觉刺激与无味觉刺激在刺激后1 ~ 3 s左右的脑电反应有显著差异。值得注意的是,alpha1和alpha2存在双峰响应。颞叶、枕叶和中央叶表现出更明显的差异。大脑地形图显示,在1-3秒内,五种基本味觉的alpha2节律存在差异。这些发现为味觉感知与大脑对味觉刺激的检测和处理之间的关系提供了有价值的见解,对食品科学、感官知觉和神经认知研究等领域具有重要的理论和实践价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
13.70%
发文量
822
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信