Direct vs. video observation of skill performance: effects on peer feedback dynamics in motor learning

IF 5.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Omar Trabelsi , Mohamed Yaakoubi , Ahmed Ghorbel , Amir Romdhani , Mustapha Bouchiba , Mohamed Abdelkader Souissi , Okba Selmi , Katja Weiss , Thomas Rosemann , Adnene Gharbi , Beat Knechtle
{"title":"Direct vs. video observation of skill performance: effects on peer feedback dynamics in motor learning","authors":"Omar Trabelsi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Yaakoubi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Ghorbel ,&nbsp;Amir Romdhani ,&nbsp;Mustapha Bouchiba ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdelkader Souissi ,&nbsp;Okba Selmi ,&nbsp;Katja Weiss ,&nbsp;Thomas Rosemann ,&nbsp;Adnene Gharbi ,&nbsp;Beat Knechtle","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Video technology facilitates feedback delivery in motor learning, benefiting teacher/coach and peer feedback. Most studies focus on attributing motor learning improvements to video-based feedback but never examine how peer feedback dynamics change to mediate the effect of video observation (VO) on learning outcomes. Therefore, this study compares the frequency, type, and accuracy of peer feedback based on direct observation (DO) and VO in a long jump learning context. Forty-one sports science students (M<sup>age</sup>: 20.13±0.71) participated in a four-session long jump learning unit. Students were then randomly paired for experimental procedures: one performed a jump while the other observed. Observers first provided 30 seconds of verbal feedback based on DO and then after viewing a video recording of the jump (VO). Roles were then switched. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed for overall feedback frequency. Feedback instances were then classified as implicit or explicit, with the latter assessed for accuracy. The main results showed that VO significantly increased the median frequency of overall feedback and explicit feedback compared to DO, with no significant difference in implicit feedback. The median accuracy of explicit feedback was also significantly higher based on VO compared to DO. These findings help explain the previously documented beneficial effects of video-based peer feedback in motor learning. They demonstrate that VO enables peers to provide more feedback, particularly explicit, more than implicit, with higher accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100296"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557325000552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Video technology facilitates feedback delivery in motor learning, benefiting teacher/coach and peer feedback. Most studies focus on attributing motor learning improvements to video-based feedback but never examine how peer feedback dynamics change to mediate the effect of video observation (VO) on learning outcomes. Therefore, this study compares the frequency, type, and accuracy of peer feedback based on direct observation (DO) and VO in a long jump learning context. Forty-one sports science students (Mage: 20.13±0.71) participated in a four-session long jump learning unit. Students were then randomly paired for experimental procedures: one performed a jump while the other observed. Observers first provided 30 seconds of verbal feedback based on DO and then after viewing a video recording of the jump (VO). Roles were then switched. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed for overall feedback frequency. Feedback instances were then classified as implicit or explicit, with the latter assessed for accuracy. The main results showed that VO significantly increased the median frequency of overall feedback and explicit feedback compared to DO, with no significant difference in implicit feedback. The median accuracy of explicit feedback was also significantly higher based on VO compared to DO. These findings help explain the previously documented beneficial effects of video-based peer feedback in motor learning. They demonstrate that VO enables peers to provide more feedback, particularly explicit, more than implicit, with higher accuracy.
技能表现的直接观察与视频观察:同伴反馈动态对运动学习的影响
视频技术有助于在运动学习中提供反馈,有利于教师/教练和同伴反馈。大多数研究将运动学习的改善归因于基于视频的反馈,但从未研究同伴反馈动态变化如何调节视频观察(VO)对学习结果的影响。因此,本研究比较了跳远学习情境下基于直接观察的同伴反馈(DO)和基于直接观察的同伴反馈(VO)的频率、类型和准确性。41名体育理科生(年龄:20.13±0.71)参加了四节跳远学习单元。然后,学生们被随机配对,进行实验程序:一个人跳,另一个人观察。观察者首先根据DO提供30秒的口头反馈,然后观看跳跃的视频记录(VO)。然后角色互换了。录音被转录并分析总体反馈频率。然后将反馈实例分类为隐式或显式,并评估后者的准确性。主要结果表明,VO显著提高了整体反馈和显式反馈的中位数频率,而内隐反馈的中位数频率差异不显著。基于VO的显式反馈的中位数准确性也显著高于基于DO的中位数准确性。这些发现有助于解释先前记录的基于视频的同伴反馈对运动学习的有益影响。他们证明,VO使同行能够提供更多的反馈,特别是明确的,而不是隐含的,具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信