The community of inquiry framework and learning analytics: A systematic review of previous research

IF 5.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Secil Caskurlu , Daniela Castellanos-Reyes , Jieun Lim , Kadir Kozan
{"title":"The community of inquiry framework and learning analytics: A systematic review of previous research","authors":"Secil Caskurlu ,&nbsp;Daniela Castellanos-Reyes ,&nbsp;Jieun Lim ,&nbsp;Kadir Kozan","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of the current systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of how the Community of Inquiry framework and learning analytics have been informing each other, thus providing suggestions for how to enhance future research and practice in online education. Overall results revealed that (a) research was primarily conducted in MOOCs and traditional online courses; (b) text and log data were the primary sources analyzed using various statistical, computational, and/or machine learning methods through various tools and software; and (c) descriptive and/or predictive analytics were the most common learning analytics methodology thus describing and/or predicting student and instructor outcomes including teaching, social and cognitive presence. Even though few studies have explicitly named it as the guiding framework, the Community of Inquiry framework has significantly influenced learning analytics research design and some studies have offered new theoretical insights. As for research quality or characteristics, fewer studies fully reported such important details as participant characteristics and data preprocessing procedures. All these findings led to the conclusion that the Community of Inquiry framework and learning analytics have been mutually beneficial so far, and similar future research needs to pay more attention to reporting quality thereby providing richer insights into both the theory and practice of online education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100289"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557325000485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the current systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of how the Community of Inquiry framework and learning analytics have been informing each other, thus providing suggestions for how to enhance future research and practice in online education. Overall results revealed that (a) research was primarily conducted in MOOCs and traditional online courses; (b) text and log data were the primary sources analyzed using various statistical, computational, and/or machine learning methods through various tools and software; and (c) descriptive and/or predictive analytics were the most common learning analytics methodology thus describing and/or predicting student and instructor outcomes including teaching, social and cognitive presence. Even though few studies have explicitly named it as the guiding framework, the Community of Inquiry framework has significantly influenced learning analytics research design and some studies have offered new theoretical insights. As for research quality or characteristics, fewer studies fully reported such important details as participant characteristics and data preprocessing procedures. All these findings led to the conclusion that the Community of Inquiry framework and learning analytics have been mutually beneficial so far, and similar future research needs to pay more attention to reporting quality thereby providing richer insights into both the theory and practice of online education.
探究框架与学习分析的共同体:对以往研究的系统回顾
当前系统综述的目的是全面概述探究共同体框架和学习分析是如何相互影响的,从而为如何加强在线教育的未来研究和实践提供建议。总体结果显示:(a)研究主要在mooc和传统在线课程中进行;(b)文本和日志数据是通过各种工具和软件使用各种统计、计算和/或机器学习方法分析的主要来源;(c)描述性和/或预测性分析是最常见的学习分析方法,因此描述和/或预测学生和教师的结果,包括教学、社会和认知存在。尽管很少有研究明确地将其命名为指导框架,但探究共同体框架对学习分析研究设计产生了重大影响,一些研究提供了新的理论见解。在研究质量或特征方面,充分报道参与者特征、数据预处理过程等重要细节的研究较少。所有这些发现得出的结论是,到目前为止,探究社区框架和学习分析是互惠互利的,未来类似的研究需要更多地关注报告质量,从而为在线教育的理论和实践提供更丰富的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信