{"title":"Determining the anisotropy field of permanent magnets: A comparison of current methodologies","authors":"Alex Aubert, Konstantin Skokov, Oliver Gutfleisch","doi":"10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the exponential rise of data-driven materials research strategies, datasets play a crucial role in developing models and predicting material properties. However, machine learning requires accurate datasets and well-defined descriptors to ensure reliable predictions. In the field of energy applications, the demand for high-performance and sustainable permanent magnets is growing, and machine learning has the potential to accelerate the discovery of new compounds. One of the key criteria for achieving hard magnetic properties is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy field (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>). Ideally, and if available, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is determined using single crystals of a defined shape. However, growing phase-pure single crystals is not always feasible for certain hard magnetic compounds due to phase stability challenges. In this study, we compare and evaluate the most commonly used methodologies for estimating the anisotropy field using Ce<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>Fe<sub>14</sub>B as a case study. Specifically, we compare different methods – including hard-axis saturation, magnetization area, Sucksmith–Thompson, the law of approach to saturation, and singular point detection – applied to single crystals, aligned polycrystals, and isotropic polycrystals. Our results show that for single crystals, almost all methods provide accurate results within a 2% relative error when the demagnetizing field is properly accounted for. However, for aligned polycrystalline powders, the highest errors are observed, reaching up to 17% compared to single-crystal data. In contrast, for bulk polycrystalline samples, only the singular point detection method using a pulse magnetometer with second derivative analysis enables an accurate estimation of the anisotropy field. These findings are particularly relevant for materials scientists seeking to use reliable descriptors in machine learning datasets and to accurately estimate the anisotropy field to accelerate new hard magnet discovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials","volume":"634 ","pages":"Article 173566"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030488532500798X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the exponential rise of data-driven materials research strategies, datasets play a crucial role in developing models and predicting material properties. However, machine learning requires accurate datasets and well-defined descriptors to ensure reliable predictions. In the field of energy applications, the demand for high-performance and sustainable permanent magnets is growing, and machine learning has the potential to accelerate the discovery of new compounds. One of the key criteria for achieving hard magnetic properties is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy field (). Ideally, and if available, is determined using single crystals of a defined shape. However, growing phase-pure single crystals is not always feasible for certain hard magnetic compounds due to phase stability challenges. In this study, we compare and evaluate the most commonly used methodologies for estimating the anisotropy field using CeFe14B as a case study. Specifically, we compare different methods – including hard-axis saturation, magnetization area, Sucksmith–Thompson, the law of approach to saturation, and singular point detection – applied to single crystals, aligned polycrystals, and isotropic polycrystals. Our results show that for single crystals, almost all methods provide accurate results within a 2% relative error when the demagnetizing field is properly accounted for. However, for aligned polycrystalline powders, the highest errors are observed, reaching up to 17% compared to single-crystal data. In contrast, for bulk polycrystalline samples, only the singular point detection method using a pulse magnetometer with second derivative analysis enables an accurate estimation of the anisotropy field. These findings are particularly relevant for materials scientists seeking to use reliable descriptors in machine learning datasets and to accurately estimate the anisotropy field to accelerate new hard magnet discovery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials provides an important forum for the disclosure and discussion of original contributions covering the whole spectrum of topics, from basic magnetism to the technology and applications of magnetic materials. The journal encourages greater interaction between the basic and applied sub-disciplines of magnetism with comprehensive review articles, in addition to full-length contributions. In addition, other categories of contributions are welcome, including Critical Focused issues, Current Perspectives and Outreach to the General Public.
Main Categories:
Full-length articles:
Technically original research documents that report results of value to the communities that comprise the journal audience. The link between chemical, structural and microstructural properties on the one hand and magnetic properties on the other hand are encouraged.
In addition to general topics covering all areas of magnetism and magnetic materials, the full-length articles also include three sub-sections, focusing on Nanomagnetism, Spintronics and Applications.
The sub-section on Nanomagnetism contains articles on magnetic nanoparticles, nanowires, thin films, 2D materials and other nanoscale magnetic materials and their applications.
The sub-section on Spintronics contains articles on magnetoresistance, magnetoimpedance, magneto-optical phenomena, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), and other topics related to spin current control and magneto-transport phenomena. The sub-section on Applications display papers that focus on applications of magnetic materials. The applications need to show a connection to magnetism.
Review articles:
Review articles organize, clarify, and summarize existing major works in the areas covered by the Journal and provide comprehensive citations to the full spectrum of relevant literature.