Determining the anisotropy field of permanent magnets: A comparison of current methodologies

IF 3 3区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alex Aubert, Konstantin Skokov, Oliver Gutfleisch
{"title":"Determining the anisotropy field of permanent magnets: A comparison of current methodologies","authors":"Alex Aubert,&nbsp;Konstantin Skokov,&nbsp;Oliver Gutfleisch","doi":"10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the exponential rise of data-driven materials research strategies, datasets play a crucial role in developing models and predicting material properties. However, machine learning requires accurate datasets and well-defined descriptors to ensure reliable predictions. In the field of energy applications, the demand for high-performance and sustainable permanent magnets is growing, and machine learning has the potential to accelerate the discovery of new compounds. One of the key criteria for achieving hard magnetic properties is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy field (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>). Ideally, and if available, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is determined using single crystals of a defined shape. However, growing phase-pure single crystals is not always feasible for certain hard magnetic compounds due to phase stability challenges. In this study, we compare and evaluate the most commonly used methodologies for estimating the anisotropy field using Ce<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>Fe<sub>14</sub>B as a case study. Specifically, we compare different methods – including hard-axis saturation, magnetization area, Sucksmith–Thompson, the law of approach to saturation, and singular point detection – applied to single crystals, aligned polycrystals, and isotropic polycrystals. Our results show that for single crystals, almost all methods provide accurate results within a 2% relative error when the demagnetizing field is properly accounted for. However, for aligned polycrystalline powders, the highest errors are observed, reaching up to 17% compared to single-crystal data. In contrast, for bulk polycrystalline samples, only the singular point detection method using a pulse magnetometer with second derivative analysis enables an accurate estimation of the anisotropy field. These findings are particularly relevant for materials scientists seeking to use reliable descriptors in machine learning datasets and to accurately estimate the anisotropy field to accelerate new hard magnet discovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials","volume":"634 ","pages":"Article 173566"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030488532500798X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the exponential rise of data-driven materials research strategies, datasets play a crucial role in developing models and predicting material properties. However, machine learning requires accurate datasets and well-defined descriptors to ensure reliable predictions. In the field of energy applications, the demand for high-performance and sustainable permanent magnets is growing, and machine learning has the potential to accelerate the discovery of new compounds. One of the key criteria for achieving hard magnetic properties is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy field (HA). Ideally, and if available, HA is determined using single crystals of a defined shape. However, growing phase-pure single crystals is not always feasible for certain hard magnetic compounds due to phase stability challenges. In this study, we compare and evaluate the most commonly used methodologies for estimating the anisotropy field using Ce2Fe14B as a case study. Specifically, we compare different methods – including hard-axis saturation, magnetization area, Sucksmith–Thompson, the law of approach to saturation, and singular point detection – applied to single crystals, aligned polycrystals, and isotropic polycrystals. Our results show that for single crystals, almost all methods provide accurate results within a 2% relative error when the demagnetizing field is properly accounted for. However, for aligned polycrystalline powders, the highest errors are observed, reaching up to 17% compared to single-crystal data. In contrast, for bulk polycrystalline samples, only the singular point detection method using a pulse magnetometer with second derivative analysis enables an accurate estimation of the anisotropy field. These findings are particularly relevant for materials scientists seeking to use reliable descriptors in machine learning datasets and to accurately estimate the anisotropy field to accelerate new hard magnet discovery.
确定永磁体各向异性磁场:当前方法的比较
随着数据驱动材料研究策略的指数级增长,数据集在开发模型和预测材料性能方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,机器学习需要准确的数据集和定义良好的描述符来确保可靠的预测。在能源应用领域,对高性能和可持续永磁体的需求正在增长,机器学习有可能加速新化合物的发现。磁晶各向异性场(HA)是实现硬磁性能的关键标准之一。理想情况下,如果可行的话,透明质酸是用特定形状的单晶来测定的。然而,由于相稳定性的挑战,对于某些硬磁性化合物,生长相纯单晶并不总是可行的。在本研究中,我们以Ce2Fe14B为例,比较和评价了估计各向异性场的最常用方法。具体来说,我们比较了不同的方法——包括硬轴饱和、磁化面积、Sucksmith-Thompson、接近饱和定律和奇点检测——应用于单晶、排列多晶和各向同性多晶。结果表明,对于单晶,在适当考虑退磁场的情况下,几乎所有的方法都能提供相对误差在2%以内的精确结果。然而,对于排列的多晶粉末,观察到的误差最高,与单晶数据相比达到17%。相比之下,对于块状多晶样品,只有使用脉冲磁强计和二阶导数分析的奇点检测方法才能准确估计各向异性场。这些发现对于寻求在机器学习数据集中使用可靠描述符并准确估计各向异性场以加速新硬磁铁发现的材料科学家尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1149
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials provides an important forum for the disclosure and discussion of original contributions covering the whole spectrum of topics, from basic magnetism to the technology and applications of magnetic materials. The journal encourages greater interaction between the basic and applied sub-disciplines of magnetism with comprehensive review articles, in addition to full-length contributions. In addition, other categories of contributions are welcome, including Critical Focused issues, Current Perspectives and Outreach to the General Public. Main Categories: Full-length articles: Technically original research documents that report results of value to the communities that comprise the journal audience. The link between chemical, structural and microstructural properties on the one hand and magnetic properties on the other hand are encouraged. In addition to general topics covering all areas of magnetism and magnetic materials, the full-length articles also include three sub-sections, focusing on Nanomagnetism, Spintronics and Applications. The sub-section on Nanomagnetism contains articles on magnetic nanoparticles, nanowires, thin films, 2D materials and other nanoscale magnetic materials and their applications. The sub-section on Spintronics contains articles on magnetoresistance, magnetoimpedance, magneto-optical phenomena, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), and other topics related to spin current control and magneto-transport phenomena. The sub-section on Applications display papers that focus on applications of magnetic materials. The applications need to show a connection to magnetism. Review articles: Review articles organize, clarify, and summarize existing major works in the areas covered by the Journal and provide comprehensive citations to the full spectrum of relevant literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信