{"title":"Stable low diffusion flux splitting schemes on unstructured meshes","authors":"Aditya K. Pandare , Jack R. Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shock instabilities are shown to manifest in modern low-diffusion flux-vector splitting (FVS) schemes when used on unstructured meshes, or situations where shocks do not align with the mesh lines. These instabilities occur irrespective of the Mach number of the shock. Three types of dissipative mechanisms that suppress these instabilities are presented. These mechanisms are carefully designed in order to affect only problematic regions of the flux-splittings. The AUSM<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>+</mo></msup></math></span> and LDFSS schemes are stabilized using the proposed modifications. It is shown that the added dissipation improves the shock behavior of AUSM and LDFSS on unstructured meshes. It is also shown that the AUSM<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>+</mo></msup></math></span>-up scheme is prone to the “carbuncle” instability, a specific type of shock instability, when used on unstructured meshes. The modifications proposed in this work do not lead to carbuncle instabilities for the problems considered here. Furthermore, the modified schemes are shown to satisfy certain properties that are crucial for accurate shear layer computations, such as stationary contact preservation. Using benchmark problems, it is demonstrated that despite the diffusion added for stabilization, these schemes are not overly diffusive. Due to these advantages, the modified FVS schemes presented here are promising candidates for high-speed compressible flow computations on unstructured meshes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Physics","volume":"543 ","pages":"Article 114415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999125006977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Shock instabilities are shown to manifest in modern low-diffusion flux-vector splitting (FVS) schemes when used on unstructured meshes, or situations where shocks do not align with the mesh lines. These instabilities occur irrespective of the Mach number of the shock. Three types of dissipative mechanisms that suppress these instabilities are presented. These mechanisms are carefully designed in order to affect only problematic regions of the flux-splittings. The AUSM and LDFSS schemes are stabilized using the proposed modifications. It is shown that the added dissipation improves the shock behavior of AUSM and LDFSS on unstructured meshes. It is also shown that the AUSM-up scheme is prone to the “carbuncle” instability, a specific type of shock instability, when used on unstructured meshes. The modifications proposed in this work do not lead to carbuncle instabilities for the problems considered here. Furthermore, the modified schemes are shown to satisfy certain properties that are crucial for accurate shear layer computations, such as stationary contact preservation. Using benchmark problems, it is demonstrated that despite the diffusion added for stabilization, these schemes are not overly diffusive. Due to these advantages, the modified FVS schemes presented here are promising candidates for high-speed compressible flow computations on unstructured meshes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Computational Physics thoroughly treats the computational aspects of physical problems, presenting techniques for the numerical solution of mathematical equations arising in all areas of physics. The journal seeks to emphasize methods that cross disciplinary boundaries.
The Journal of Computational Physics also publishes short notes of 4 pages or less (including figures, tables, and references but excluding title pages). Letters to the Editor commenting on articles already published in this Journal will also be considered. Neither notes nor letters should have an abstract.