Inventory control and picking behavior: The roles of sustainability messages and price discounts

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Thomas Vogt, Ben Lowery, Anna-Lena Sachs, Ulrich W. Thonemann
{"title":"Inventory control and picking behavior: The roles of sustainability messages and price discounts","authors":"Thomas Vogt, Ben Lowery, Anna-Lena Sachs, Ulrich W. Thonemann","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Customer picking behavior plays an important role in retail inventory management. Inventory models often distinguish between picking the freshest items, i.e., last-in-first-out (LIFO), or oldest items first, i.e., first-in-first-out (FIFO). We analyze how picking behavior affects inventory management, and how sustainability messages and price discounts can change picking behavior to increase sales of earlier expiring items and reduce food waste. By conducting an online experiment, we find that: (1) sustainability messages induce more subjects to buy earlier expiring items; (2) higher price discounts increase sales of earlier expiring items; and (3) some subjects do not change their behavior, or crowd out with price discounts. Understanding how different customer types respond to incentives helps retailers offer them only to customers who most likely respond with buying expiring items. We evaluate the effect of these findings on inventories using a periodic review model for perishable items with age-dependent lifetimes. Assuming Poisson and Negative Binomial demand in our numerical study, we find that the retailer’s costs may be up to 30.25% lower under pure FIFO compared to pure LIFO demand. We estimate the cost savings if a retailer nudges customers to change their picking behavior and analyze different FIFO-LIFO splits, which is more realistic than the retailer assuming pure FIFO or LIFO picking behavior. Furthermore, we show that misspecification of the FIFO-LIFO split has a notable effect on inventory costs, in-stock probability and waste, and that the retailer should rather slightly overestimate FIFO than LIFO if actual picking behavior is unknown.","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.09.028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Customer picking behavior plays an important role in retail inventory management. Inventory models often distinguish between picking the freshest items, i.e., last-in-first-out (LIFO), or oldest items first, i.e., first-in-first-out (FIFO). We analyze how picking behavior affects inventory management, and how sustainability messages and price discounts can change picking behavior to increase sales of earlier expiring items and reduce food waste. By conducting an online experiment, we find that: (1) sustainability messages induce more subjects to buy earlier expiring items; (2) higher price discounts increase sales of earlier expiring items; and (3) some subjects do not change their behavior, or crowd out with price discounts. Understanding how different customer types respond to incentives helps retailers offer them only to customers who most likely respond with buying expiring items. We evaluate the effect of these findings on inventories using a periodic review model for perishable items with age-dependent lifetimes. Assuming Poisson and Negative Binomial demand in our numerical study, we find that the retailer’s costs may be up to 30.25% lower under pure FIFO compared to pure LIFO demand. We estimate the cost savings if a retailer nudges customers to change their picking behavior and analyze different FIFO-LIFO splits, which is more realistic than the retailer assuming pure FIFO or LIFO picking behavior. Furthermore, we show that misspecification of the FIFO-LIFO split has a notable effect on inventory costs, in-stock probability and waste, and that the retailer should rather slightly overestimate FIFO than LIFO if actual picking behavior is unknown.
库存控制和挑选行为:可持续性信息和价格折扣的作用
顾客挑选行为在零售库存管理中起着重要的作用。库存模型通常区分挑选最新鲜的物品,即后进先出(LIFO),或最旧的物品,即先进先出(FIFO)。我们分析了采摘行为如何影响库存管理,以及可持续发展信息和价格折扣如何改变采摘行为,以增加早过期商品的销售并减少食物浪费。通过在线实验,我们发现:(1)可持续发展信息诱导更多的被试购买提前过期的商品;(2)较高的价格折扣增加了较早过期商品的销售;(3)部分受试者不改变行为,或以价格折扣挤出。了解不同类型的顾客对激励措施的反应,有助于零售商只向最有可能购买过期商品的顾客提供激励措施。我们使用具有年龄依赖寿命的易腐物品的定期审查模型来评估这些发现对库存的影响。在我们的数值研究中,假设泊松需求和负二项需求,我们发现纯FIFO的零售商成本可能比纯LIFO的零售商成本低30.25%。我们估计如果零售商推动顾客改变他们的选择行为,并分析不同的FIFO-LIFO分割,这比零售商假设纯FIFO或LIFO选择行为更现实。此外,我们表明,FIFO-LIFO分割的错误规范对库存成本,库存概率和浪费有显着影响,并且如果实际挑选行为未知,零售商应该稍微高估FIFO而不是LIFO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信