Assessments Under Pressure: Interviews With Triage Nurses in Emergency Departments: An Exploratory Descriptive Qualitative Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Hugh Gorick,Marie McGee,Toby O Smith
{"title":"Assessments Under Pressure: Interviews With Triage Nurses in Emergency Departments: An Exploratory Descriptive Qualitative Study.","authors":"Hugh Gorick,Marie McGee,Toby O Smith","doi":"10.1111/jan.70283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nTo understand the experiences and decision-making practices of registered nurses when assessing acuity at triage in emergency departments.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nThe study utilised a qualitative exploratory-descriptive design.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPurposive sampling recruited 11 registered nurses with triage experience from across the United Kingdom. Semi-structured online interviews, incorporating practice-based vignettes, were conducted between April and November 2024. Thematic analysis was selected to analyse the data.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThree themes were identified: (1) Pressurised decisions, highlighting the effects of overcrowding, staffing shortages and operational burdens; (2) Holistic assessments, revealing the shift from structured to intuitive decision-making as nurses gain experience; and (3) Confidence, competence and emotional wellbeing, illustrating the psychological impacts of triage and the importance of experience and support.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study provides novel insight into how triage nurses navigate acuity assessment in high-pressure environments. It shows how experience, training and institutional culture influence decision-making and wellbeing. It identifies key areas for targeted intervention.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nTriage nurses face substantial cognitive and emotional strain, which may compromise assessment quality and safety. Findings highlight the urgent need for structured triage training, protected time for assessment and access to wellbeing and peer support systems.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nWhat problem did the study address?: A need for current literature exploring the practices and experiences of triage nurses. What were the main findings?: Triage nurses experience significant environmental and emotional pressures, develop decision-making strategies through experience and require enhanced training and support to ensure safe, effective care. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: Findings are relevant to emergency departments internationally, triage nurses, nurse educators and healthcare leaders.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nThis study adheared to COREQ reporting guidelines, and a copy of the checklist is attached as Data S1.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nThis study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIMS To understand the experiences and decision-making practices of registered nurses when assessing acuity at triage in emergency departments. DESIGN The study utilised a qualitative exploratory-descriptive design. METHODS Purposive sampling recruited 11 registered nurses with triage experience from across the United Kingdom. Semi-structured online interviews, incorporating practice-based vignettes, were conducted between April and November 2024. Thematic analysis was selected to analyse the data. RESULTS Three themes were identified: (1) Pressurised decisions, highlighting the effects of overcrowding, staffing shortages and operational burdens; (2) Holistic assessments, revealing the shift from structured to intuitive decision-making as nurses gain experience; and (3) Confidence, competence and emotional wellbeing, illustrating the psychological impacts of triage and the importance of experience and support. CONCLUSIONS This study provides novel insight into how triage nurses navigate acuity assessment in high-pressure environments. It shows how experience, training and institutional culture influence decision-making and wellbeing. It identifies key areas for targeted intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Triage nurses face substantial cognitive and emotional strain, which may compromise assessment quality and safety. Findings highlight the urgent need for structured triage training, protected time for assessment and access to wellbeing and peer support systems. IMPACT What problem did the study address?: A need for current literature exploring the practices and experiences of triage nurses. What were the main findings?: Triage nurses experience significant environmental and emotional pressures, develop decision-making strategies through experience and require enhanced training and support to ensure safe, effective care. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: Findings are relevant to emergency departments internationally, triage nurses, nurse educators and healthcare leaders. REPORTING METHOD This study adheared to COREQ reporting guidelines, and a copy of the checklist is attached as Data S1. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
压力下的评估:急诊科分诊护士访谈:一项探索性描述性质的研究。
目的了解急诊科注册护士在分诊时评估视敏度的经验和决策做法。设计本研究采用定性探索性-描述性设计。方法采用阳性抽样方法,从英国各地招募11名具有分诊经验的注册护士。在2024年4月至11月期间进行了半结构化的在线访谈,其中包括基于实践的小插曲。采用专题分析法对数据进行分析。结果确定了三个主题:(1)压力决策,突出了过度拥挤、人员短缺和运营负担的影响;(2)整体评估,揭示随着护士经验的积累,从结构化决策向直觉决策的转变;(3)信心、能力和情绪健康,说明分诊的心理影响以及经验和支持的重要性。结论本研究为分诊护士如何在高压环境下进行视力评估提供了新的见解。它显示了经验、培训和机构文化如何影响决策和福祉。它确定了有针对性干预的关键领域。对职业和/或病人护理的启示分诊护士面临着巨大的认知和情绪压力,这可能会影响评估的质量和安全性。调查结果强调,迫切需要有组织的分类培训、有保障的评估时间以及获得福利和同伴支持系统的机会。这项研究解决了什么问题?需要当前文献探索分诊护士的实践和经验。主要发现是什么?分诊护士承受着巨大的环境和情感压力,通过经验制定决策策略,需要加强培训和支持,以确保安全、有效的护理。这项研究将对谁和在哪里产生影响?研究结果与国际急诊科、分诊护士、护士教育者和医疗保健领导者相关。报告方法本研究遵循COREQ报告指南,并附上一份清单作为数据S1。患者或公众的贡献本研究的设计、实施或报告中没有患者或公众的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信