{"title":"Insights and Perceptions of Gender Discrimination in a Woman-Dominated Profession: A Cross-Sectional Study of Women in Nursing.","authors":"Patricia Gauci,Lauretta Luck,Kate O'Reilly,Wenpeng You,Kath Peters","doi":"10.1111/jan.70282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nThe overarching aim was to explore women registered nurses' perceptions of gender discrimination in the workplace.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA descriptive cross-sectional exploratory survey within a sequential explanatory mixed methods study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nBetween September and December 2023, data were collected from 173 registered nurses who self-identified as women. The survey captured demographic data, attitudes to gender discrimination in society using the 'Contemporary Gender Discrimination Attitude Scale' and perceptions of workplace gender discrimination in nursing across four dimensions, assessed using the 'Perception of Workplace Gender Discrimination for Women Nurses Scale' (PWGD-WN). Descriptive statistics presented as means and standard deviations were used to describe and interpret data. Regression analysis and chi-square tests were employed to examine associations between key variables.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe mean score on the Contemporary Gender Discrimination Attitude Scale was 4.56 (on a 6-point scale), indicating that on average respondents agreed that gender discrimination remains an issue in society. The PWGD-WN scale mean scores for the dimensions of gender discrimination (5-point scale) from lowest to highest were: 'Gender bias from other women' (Mean: 3.13, SD: 1.147), 'Interpersonal discrimination' (Mean: 3.30, SD: 1.135), 'Glass escalator' (Mean: 3.77, SD: 0.946) and 'Primary carer' (Mean: 3.86, SD: 0.796); higher scores indicated agreement with items. 'Primary carer' was the strongest predictor of attitude, followed by the 'Glass escalator'. Highest qualification obtained was highlighted as a key predictor of nurses' perceptions of workplace discrimination.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe results of this study highlight that women in nursing perceive that systemic and multidimensional discrimination exists in the workplace.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION\r\nThe results can be utilised to understand how discrimination manifests in the workplace for women in a woman-dominated profession.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis research provides the first quantitative measure of perceived workplace gender discrimination for Australian women registered nurses.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nWe have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines-STROBE.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nThis study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
The overarching aim was to explore women registered nurses' perceptions of gender discrimination in the workplace.
DESIGN
A descriptive cross-sectional exploratory survey within a sequential explanatory mixed methods study.
METHODS
Between September and December 2023, data were collected from 173 registered nurses who self-identified as women. The survey captured demographic data, attitudes to gender discrimination in society using the 'Contemporary Gender Discrimination Attitude Scale' and perceptions of workplace gender discrimination in nursing across four dimensions, assessed using the 'Perception of Workplace Gender Discrimination for Women Nurses Scale' (PWGD-WN). Descriptive statistics presented as means and standard deviations were used to describe and interpret data. Regression analysis and chi-square tests were employed to examine associations between key variables.
RESULTS
The mean score on the Contemporary Gender Discrimination Attitude Scale was 4.56 (on a 6-point scale), indicating that on average respondents agreed that gender discrimination remains an issue in society. The PWGD-WN scale mean scores for the dimensions of gender discrimination (5-point scale) from lowest to highest were: 'Gender bias from other women' (Mean: 3.13, SD: 1.147), 'Interpersonal discrimination' (Mean: 3.30, SD: 1.135), 'Glass escalator' (Mean: 3.77, SD: 0.946) and 'Primary carer' (Mean: 3.86, SD: 0.796); higher scores indicated agreement with items. 'Primary carer' was the strongest predictor of attitude, followed by the 'Glass escalator'. Highest qualification obtained was highlighted as a key predictor of nurses' perceptions of workplace discrimination.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study highlight that women in nursing perceive that systemic and multidimensional discrimination exists in the workplace.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION
The results can be utilised to understand how discrimination manifests in the workplace for women in a woman-dominated profession.
IMPACT
This research provides the first quantitative measure of perceived workplace gender discrimination for Australian women registered nurses.
REPORTING METHOD
We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines-STROBE.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.