The Association Between Caregiving Context and the Health and Well‐Being of Carers and Their Care Recipients Living With Dementia: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Cheng‐Ya Lee, Yun‐Hee Jeon, Judith Fethney, Karen Watson, Lee‐Fay Low, Loren Mowszowski, Robert T. Woods
{"title":"The Association Between Caregiving Context and the Health and Well‐Being of Carers and Their Care Recipients Living With Dementia: A Cross‐Sectional Study","authors":"Cheng‐Ya Lee, Yun‐Hee Jeon, Judith Fethney, Karen Watson, Lee‐Fay Low, Loren Mowszowski, Robert T. Woods","doi":"10.1111/jan.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim(s)To examine the association between caregiving context and the health and well‐being of community‐dwelling people with dementia (functional ability, physical function, depression, quality of life and health‐related quality of life) and their informal carers (health‐related quality of life) at the pre‐rehabilitation stage and the potential mediating role of caregiving context variables.DesignCross‐sectional study.MethodsSecondary analysis of baseline data from a randomised controlled trial of 130 dementia care dyads—the Interdisciplinary Home‐based Reablement Programme (2018–2022). Bivariate analyses were applied to identify key caregiving context variables—co‐residence, sole carer status, additional caring responsibilities, client‐carer relationship and subjective carer burden (carer burden hereafter)—associated with health outcomes. Subsequently, multivariable linear regression models were developed. To examine carer burden, two models were run for each outcome: one with caregiving context variables and covariates, and the other adding carer burden. The mediating effects of the identified caregiving context variable were examined using post hoc mediation analysis.ResultsSpouse/partner carer relationship was significantly associated with better client well‐being, including lower depressive symptoms and higher quality of life scores compared to adult child and other relationships. Higher carer burden was strongly associated with lower functional ability, more depressive symptoms, lower quality of life for clients and lower health‐related quality of life for both clients and carers. Including carer burden in regression models explained the greatest variance across most models. Carer burden fully mediated the association between additional caring responsibilities and client functional ability, and partially mediated the association between other carers and client depression.ConclusionCarer burden needs to be carefully considered in supporting the health and well‐being of dementia carer dyads.ImplicationsAddressing carer burden and tailoring support to carers are essential for optimising health impacts for dementia carer dyads.Reporting MethodSTROBE checklist.Patient or Public ContributionNone.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ACTRN12618000600246","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim(s)To examine the association between caregiving context and the health and well‐being of community‐dwelling people with dementia (functional ability, physical function, depression, quality of life and health‐related quality of life) and their informal carers (health‐related quality of life) at the pre‐rehabilitation stage and the potential mediating role of caregiving context variables.DesignCross‐sectional study.MethodsSecondary analysis of baseline data from a randomised controlled trial of 130 dementia care dyads—the Interdisciplinary Home‐based Reablement Programme (2018–2022). Bivariate analyses were applied to identify key caregiving context variables—co‐residence, sole carer status, additional caring responsibilities, client‐carer relationship and subjective carer burden (carer burden hereafter)—associated with health outcomes. Subsequently, multivariable linear regression models were developed. To examine carer burden, two models were run for each outcome: one with caregiving context variables and covariates, and the other adding carer burden. The mediating effects of the identified caregiving context variable were examined using post hoc mediation analysis.ResultsSpouse/partner carer relationship was significantly associated with better client well‐being, including lower depressive symptoms and higher quality of life scores compared to adult child and other relationships. Higher carer burden was strongly associated with lower functional ability, more depressive symptoms, lower quality of life for clients and lower health‐related quality of life for both clients and carers. Including carer burden in regression models explained the greatest variance across most models. Carer burden fully mediated the association between additional caring responsibilities and client functional ability, and partially mediated the association between other carers and client depression.ConclusionCarer burden needs to be carefully considered in supporting the health and well‐being of dementia carer dyads.ImplicationsAddressing carer burden and tailoring support to carers are essential for optimising health impacts for dementia carer dyads.Reporting MethodSTROBE checklist.Patient or Public ContributionNone.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ACTRN12618000600246
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.