Prognostic Interplay of Caveolin1 and FOXC1 in Early Nonmetastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

IF 1.2
Asmaa H Mohamed, Aziza E Abdelrahman, Moamna M Fahmy, Ahmad B Waley, Mohamed Saleh, Abdelfatah H Abdelwanis, Ahmed I Khalil, Enas M Fouad
{"title":"Prognostic Interplay of Caveolin1 and FOXC1 in Early Nonmetastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.","authors":"Asmaa H Mohamed, Aziza E Abdelrahman, Moamna M Fahmy, Ahmad B Waley, Mohamed Saleh, Abdelfatah H Abdelwanis, Ahmed I Khalil, Enas M Fouad","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks specific molecular targets. This highlights an obvious need to identify specific prognostic biomarkers to stratify patients and guide treatment decisions. We designed this study to evaluate CAV1 and FOXC1 immunohistochemical expression and their correlation to survival outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). CAV1 and FOXC1 expressions were analyzed in 50 cases of TNBC. Clinical data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and NAC response were collected and statistically evaluated. The predominant histologic subtype was invasive carcinoma of no special type (78%), with most cases being grade II (56%). CAV1 positivity was observed in 24% of cases, while FOXC1 was expressed in 74%. FOXC1 was significantly associated with higher tumor grade (P=0.02), advanced stage (P<0.001), and nodal involvement (P=0.002). It also correlated with poor NAC response and worse OS and PFS (P=0.001 and 0.01, respectively). There was a significant association of CAV1 with grade (P=0.002), lymph node involvement (P=0.003), stage (P=0.01), unfavorable clinical and pathologic response to NAC (P<0.001, P=0.01), and poor OS and PFS (P<0.001 for each). Conclusions: Both CAV1 and FOXC1 may serve as adverse prognostic indicators in TNBC. Their overexpression suggests a potential lack of benefit from NAC, indicating that targeted therapies against these markers might be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":520562,"journal":{"name":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks specific molecular targets. This highlights an obvious need to identify specific prognostic biomarkers to stratify patients and guide treatment decisions. We designed this study to evaluate CAV1 and FOXC1 immunohistochemical expression and their correlation to survival outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). CAV1 and FOXC1 expressions were analyzed in 50 cases of TNBC. Clinical data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and NAC response were collected and statistically evaluated. The predominant histologic subtype was invasive carcinoma of no special type (78%), with most cases being grade II (56%). CAV1 positivity was observed in 24% of cases, while FOXC1 was expressed in 74%. FOXC1 was significantly associated with higher tumor grade (P=0.02), advanced stage (P<0.001), and nodal involvement (P=0.002). It also correlated with poor NAC response and worse OS and PFS (P=0.001 and 0.01, respectively). There was a significant association of CAV1 with grade (P=0.002), lymph node involvement (P=0.003), stage (P=0.01), unfavorable clinical and pathologic response to NAC (P<0.001, P=0.01), and poor OS and PFS (P<0.001 for each). Conclusions: Both CAV1 and FOXC1 may serve as adverse prognostic indicators in TNBC. Their overexpression suggests a potential lack of benefit from NAC, indicating that targeted therapies against these markers might be more effective.

Caveolin1和FOXC1在接受新辅助化疗的早期非转移性三阴性乳腺癌中的预后相互作用
三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)缺乏特异性的分子靶点。这突出了明确需要确定特定的预后生物标志物来对患者进行分层并指导治疗决策。我们设计了这项研究来评估CAV1和FOXC1的免疫组织化学表达及其与生存结局和对新辅助化疗(NAC)的反应的相关性。分析50例TNBC中CAV1和FOXC1的表达情况。收集总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和NAC反应的临床数据并进行统计评估。主要的组织学亚型为浸润性癌,无特殊类型(78%),大多数病例为II级(56%)。CAV1阳性占24%,FOXC1阳性占74%。FOXC1与肿瘤分级高(P=0.02)、晚期(P= 0.05)相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信