Difficult airway management in adults: Insights from an observational cohort study on the use of videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a direct laryngoscopy-based practice.

IF 3.1
Alexander Avidan, Tural Alekberli, Fung H Mua, Charles Weissman, Chloé Mimouni
{"title":"Difficult airway management in adults: Insights from an observational cohort study on the use of videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a direct laryngoscopy-based practice.","authors":"Alexander Avidan, Tural Alekberli, Fung H Mua, Charles Weissman, Chloé Mimouni","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00280-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Videolaryngoscopy has significantly improved the management of unanticipated difficult airways and replaced other intubation techniques. The goal of this study was to identify the indications for using videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for adult patients, where direct laryngoscopy is the standard intubation technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a one-year period from January to December 2018, anesthesiologists were surveyed on their reasons for using a videolaryngoscope or fiberoptic bronchoscope for tracheal intubations. Additionally, retrospective data on all direct laryngoscopy intubations were collected for the same period from the anesthesia information management system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 6251 tracheal intubations with direct laryngoscopy and 502 with videolaryngoscopy or fiberoptic bronchoscopy, data from 450 (89.6%) cases were collected. We excluded 46 cases where videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy were used for non-airway management reasons, resulting in 404 cases for analysis. Videolaryngoscopy was initially used in 356 (88.1%) patients. The primary reasons for using videolaryngoscopy or fiberoptic bronchoscopy were anticipated difficult intubation (218, 54.0%) and cervical pathology (109, 27.0%). Among the 42 cases of unanticipated failed direct laryngoscopy, videolaryngoscopy was used in 41 cases and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in 1 case. The overall rate of unanticipated failed direct laryngoscopy was 0.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The routine use of videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for anticipated difficult tracheal intubations led to a very low incidence of unanticipated failed tracheal intubations with direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, routinely using more expensive videolaryngoscopes for all intubations would prevent only very small numbers of unanticipated failed direct laryngoscopic intubations and is not financially justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00280-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Videolaryngoscopy has significantly improved the management of unanticipated difficult airways and replaced other intubation techniques. The goal of this study was to identify the indications for using videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for adult patients, where direct laryngoscopy is the standard intubation technique.

Methods: Over a one-year period from January to December 2018, anesthesiologists were surveyed on their reasons for using a videolaryngoscope or fiberoptic bronchoscope for tracheal intubations. Additionally, retrospective data on all direct laryngoscopy intubations were collected for the same period from the anesthesia information management system.

Results: Out of 6251 tracheal intubations with direct laryngoscopy and 502 with videolaryngoscopy or fiberoptic bronchoscopy, data from 450 (89.6%) cases were collected. We excluded 46 cases where videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy were used for non-airway management reasons, resulting in 404 cases for analysis. Videolaryngoscopy was initially used in 356 (88.1%) patients. The primary reasons for using videolaryngoscopy or fiberoptic bronchoscopy were anticipated difficult intubation (218, 54.0%) and cervical pathology (109, 27.0%). Among the 42 cases of unanticipated failed direct laryngoscopy, videolaryngoscopy was used in 41 cases and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in 1 case. The overall rate of unanticipated failed direct laryngoscopy was 0.7%.

Conclusions: The routine use of videolaryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy for anticipated difficult tracheal intubations led to a very low incidence of unanticipated failed tracheal intubations with direct laryngoscopy. Therefore, routinely using more expensive videolaryngoscopes for all intubations would prevent only very small numbers of unanticipated failed direct laryngoscopic intubations and is not financially justified.

成人气道管理困难:一项观察性队列研究在直接喉镜基础上使用视频喉镜和纤维支气管镜的见解。
背景:视频喉镜检查显著改善了意外困难气道的处理,并取代了其他插管技术。本研究的目的是确定成人患者使用视频喉镜和纤维支气管镜的适应症,其中直接喉镜是标准的插管技术。方法:于2018年1月至12月对麻醉医师进行气管插管使用视频喉镜或纤维支气管镜的原因调查。此外,从麻醉信息管理系统中收集同期所有直接喉镜插管的回顾性数据。结果:6251例直接喉镜下气管插管,502例视频喉镜或纤维支气管镜下气管插管,共收集450例(89.6%)的数据。我们排除了46例因非气道管理原因使用视频喉镜和纤维支气管镜的病例,共404例进行分析。356例(88.1%)患者最初使用视频喉镜检查。使用视频喉镜或纤维支气管镜检查的主要原因是预期插管困难(218例,54.0%)和颈部病理(109例,27.0%)。42例直接喉镜检查意外失败,41例行视频喉镜检查,1例行纤维支气管镜检查。意外喉镜检查失败的总比率为0.7%。结论:常规使用视频喉镜和纤维支气管镜检查预期气管插管困难,直接喉镜下气管插管意外失败的发生率极低。因此,常规使用更昂贵的视频喉镜进行所有插管只能防止极少数意外的直接喉镜插管失败,并且在经济上是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信