{"title":"\"Addicted\" rats? Epistemic challenges in modeling addiction with laboratory animals.","authors":"Héloïse Athéa","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00701-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contemporary biology laboratories, animal models have become essential scientific tools. From modeling psychiatric disorders to investigating embryonic development and genetic diseases, they facilitate research across various fields. Although scientists are generally cautious about extrapolating results from these models, this paper introduces a thought-provoking case study-the three-criteria addiction model-which boldly endeavors to induce \"full addiction\" in laboratory rats. Given the model's influence in the field of behavioral neuroscience, this paper aims to conduct its comprehensive epistemic analysis, exploring whether \"addicted rats\" genuinely exist and the potential implications for understanding addiction and mental disorders. Conducting such an epistemic analysis presents a difficulty in itself due to the heterogeneity of approaches employed by philosophers of science to analyze animal models. The second objective of this paper is, therefore, to propose a general method to guide epistemic scrutiny of animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-025-00701-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In contemporary biology laboratories, animal models have become essential scientific tools. From modeling psychiatric disorders to investigating embryonic development and genetic diseases, they facilitate research across various fields. Although scientists are generally cautious about extrapolating results from these models, this paper introduces a thought-provoking case study-the three-criteria addiction model-which boldly endeavors to induce "full addiction" in laboratory rats. Given the model's influence in the field of behavioral neuroscience, this paper aims to conduct its comprehensive epistemic analysis, exploring whether "addicted rats" genuinely exist and the potential implications for understanding addiction and mental disorders. Conducting such an epistemic analysis presents a difficulty in itself due to the heterogeneity of approaches employed by philosophers of science to analyze animal models. The second objective of this paper is, therefore, to propose a general method to guide epistemic scrutiny of animal models.
期刊介绍:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).