"Addicted" rats? Epistemic challenges in modeling addiction with laboratory animals.

IF 1 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Héloïse Athéa
{"title":"\"Addicted\" rats? Epistemic challenges in modeling addiction with laboratory animals.","authors":"Héloïse Athéa","doi":"10.1007/s40656-025-00701-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contemporary biology laboratories, animal models have become essential scientific tools. From modeling psychiatric disorders to investigating embryonic development and genetic diseases, they facilitate research across various fields. Although scientists are generally cautious about extrapolating results from these models, this paper introduces a thought-provoking case study-the three-criteria addiction model-which boldly endeavors to induce \"full addiction\" in laboratory rats. Given the model's influence in the field of behavioral neuroscience, this paper aims to conduct its comprehensive epistemic analysis, exploring whether \"addicted rats\" genuinely exist and the potential implications for understanding addiction and mental disorders. Conducting such an epistemic analysis presents a difficulty in itself due to the heterogeneity of approaches employed by philosophers of science to analyze animal models. The second objective of this paper is, therefore, to propose a general method to guide epistemic scrutiny of animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":56308,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","volume":"47 4","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-025-00701-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary biology laboratories, animal models have become essential scientific tools. From modeling psychiatric disorders to investigating embryonic development and genetic diseases, they facilitate research across various fields. Although scientists are generally cautious about extrapolating results from these models, this paper introduces a thought-provoking case study-the three-criteria addiction model-which boldly endeavors to induce "full addiction" in laboratory rats. Given the model's influence in the field of behavioral neuroscience, this paper aims to conduct its comprehensive epistemic analysis, exploring whether "addicted rats" genuinely exist and the potential implications for understanding addiction and mental disorders. Conducting such an epistemic analysis presents a difficulty in itself due to the heterogeneity of approaches employed by philosophers of science to analyze animal models. The second objective of this paper is, therefore, to propose a general method to guide epistemic scrutiny of animal models.

“上瘾”老鼠吗?用实验动物模拟成瘾的认知挑战。
在当代生物学实验室中,动物模型已经成为必不可少的科学工具。从精神疾病建模到研究胚胎发育和遗传疾病,它们促进了各个领域的研究。尽管科学家们通常对从这些模型中推断结果持谨慎态度,但本文介绍了一个发人深省的案例研究——三标准成瘾模型——该模型大胆地试图在实验室大鼠中诱导“完全成瘾”。鉴于该模型在行为神经科学领域的影响,本文旨在对其进行全面的认知分析,探讨“成瘾大鼠”是否真实存在,以及对理解成瘾和精神障碍的潜在意义。进行这样的认知分析本身就存在困难,因为科学哲学家在分析动物模型时采用的方法存在异质性。因此,本文的第二个目标是提出一种指导动物模型的认知审查的一般方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences is an interdisciplinary journal committed to providing an integrative approach to understanding the life sciences. It welcomes submissions from historians, philosophers, biologists, physicians, ethicists and scholars in the social studies of science. Contributors are expected to offer broad and interdisciplinary perspectives on the development of biology, biomedicine and related fields, especially as these perspectives illuminate the foundations, development, and/or implications of scientific practices and related developments. Submissions which are collaborative and feature different disciplinary approaches are especially encouraged, as are submissions written by senior and junior scholars (including graduate students).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信