Improving Efficiency and Safety with Prefilled Syringes: A Model-Based Economic Evaluation for US Healthcare Settings.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-10-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S544296
Matthias Borms, Ashley Taneja, Mia Weiss, Haymen Girgis, Cecile Frolet, Julia D Lucaci
{"title":"Improving Efficiency and Safety with Prefilled Syringes: A Model-Based Economic Evaluation for US Healthcare Settings.","authors":"Matthias Borms, Ashley Taneja, Mia Weiss, Haymen Girgis, Cecile Frolet, Julia D Lucaci","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S544296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prefilled syringes provide an opportunity to improve clinical safety and operational efficiency in hospital settings, especially amid mounting and ongoing challenges such as staff shortages, escalating drug costs, and increasing importance of safe medication administration. Despite these potential benefits, adoption remains limited. This study develops an economic model to assess the clinical and financial impacts of switching from conventional vial-and-syringe methods to prefilled syringes in United States (US) hospitals' intensive care units (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address the gap between the potential benefits of prefilled syringes and their limited adoption, an economic model was developed to help decision-makers make informed choices based on the clinical and financial impact of switching to prefilled syringes in US ICUs. The model used peer-reviewed literature and hospital practices around the most utilized dosages in a US hospital. To illustrate model utility, three hypothetical ICU cases were developed: administering 30 daily doses of atropine 1mg/10mL, epinephrine 1mg/10mL, and ephedrine 25mg/10mL. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Switching to prefilled syringes resulted in annual cost savings of $729,912 for atropine, $786,502 for epinephrine, and $709,772 for ephedrine. The model estimated annual savings to be $696,551 due to fewer pADEs, along with savings of $53,411, $89,744 and $50,244 annually, due to unused drug wastage reduction for each drug, respectively. Hospital staff preparation time decreased by 255 hours for atropine, 285 for epinephrine and 227 hours for ephedrine per year. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model by varying drug wastage rates, with potential savings of up to $740,443, $795,894 and $724,757 for each drug, respectively, showing the model's adaptability across different ICU scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This model suggests prefilled syringes may help hospitals address pharmacy operational challenges by reducing preparation time, drug wastage, and pADEs. They offer a practical approach to support safer and more efficient medication delivery in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"673-685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S544296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prefilled syringes provide an opportunity to improve clinical safety and operational efficiency in hospital settings, especially amid mounting and ongoing challenges such as staff shortages, escalating drug costs, and increasing importance of safe medication administration. Despite these potential benefits, adoption remains limited. This study develops an economic model to assess the clinical and financial impacts of switching from conventional vial-and-syringe methods to prefilled syringes in United States (US) hospitals' intensive care units (ICU).

Methods: To address the gap between the potential benefits of prefilled syringes and their limited adoption, an economic model was developed to help decision-makers make informed choices based on the clinical and financial impact of switching to prefilled syringes in US ICUs. The model used peer-reviewed literature and hospital practices around the most utilized dosages in a US hospital. To illustrate model utility, three hypothetical ICU cases were developed: administering 30 daily doses of atropine 1mg/10mL, epinephrine 1mg/10mL, and ephedrine 25mg/10mL. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness.

Results: Switching to prefilled syringes resulted in annual cost savings of $729,912 for atropine, $786,502 for epinephrine, and $709,772 for ephedrine. The model estimated annual savings to be $696,551 due to fewer pADEs, along with savings of $53,411, $89,744 and $50,244 annually, due to unused drug wastage reduction for each drug, respectively. Hospital staff preparation time decreased by 255 hours for atropine, 285 for epinephrine and 227 hours for ephedrine per year. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model by varying drug wastage rates, with potential savings of up to $740,443, $795,894 and $724,757 for each drug, respectively, showing the model's adaptability across different ICU scenarios.

Conclusion: This model suggests prefilled syringes may help hospitals address pharmacy operational challenges by reducing preparation time, drug wastage, and pADEs. They offer a practical approach to support safer and more efficient medication delivery in clinical settings.

提高效率和安全性与预充注射器:基于模型的经济评估为美国医疗保健设置。
背景:预充式注射器为提高医院环境中的临床安全性和操作效率提供了机会,特别是在人员短缺、药品成本不断上升以及安全用药日益重要等日益严峻和持续的挑战中。尽管有这些潜在的好处,但采用仍然有限。本研究开发了一个经济模型,以评估美国医院重症监护病房(ICU)从传统的小瓶和注射器方法转向预充注射器的临床和财务影响。方法:为了解决预充式注射器的潜在效益与其有限采用之间的差距,我们开发了一个经济模型,以帮助决策者根据美国icu切换到预充式注射器的临床和财务影响做出明智的选择。该模型采用了同行评议的文献和美国一家医院最常用剂量的医院实践。为了说明模型的实用性,开发了三个假设的ICU病例:每天给予30剂量的阿托品1mg/10mL,肾上腺素1mg/10mL和麻黄素25mg/10mL。进行敏感性分析以检验模型的稳健性。结果:改用预充式注射器每年可节省阿托品729,912美元、肾上腺素786,502美元和麻黄素709,772美元的费用。该模型估计,由于减少了页数,每年可节省696,551美元,同时由于减少了每种药物的未使用药物浪费,每年可节省53,411美元、89,744美元和50,244美元。医院工作人员每年的准备时间分别减少了阿托品255小时、肾上腺素285小时和麻黄素227小时。敏感性分析通过不同的药物浪费率证实了该模型的稳健性,每种药物的潜在节省分别高达740,443美元,795,894美元和724,757美元,显示了该模型在不同ICU情景下的适应性。结论:该模型表明,预充式注射器可以通过减少制备时间、药物浪费和pADEs,帮助医院解决药房运营方面的挑战。它们提供了一种实用的方法来支持临床环境中更安全、更有效的药物输送。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信