Examining healthcare staff views and experiences with equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in a multi-disciplinary healthcare setting: A mixed methods needs assessment to advance inclusive excellence.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Services Management Research Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1177/09514848251387042
Lauren R Squires, Logan Meyers, Myann Marks, Eryn Tong, Ekaterina An, Camilla Zimmermann, Jacqueline L Bender
{"title":"Examining healthcare staff views and experiences with equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in a multi-disciplinary healthcare setting: A mixed methods needs assessment to advance inclusive excellence.","authors":"Lauren R Squires, Logan Meyers, Myann Marks, Eryn Tong, Ekaterina An, Camilla Zimmermann, Jacqueline L Bender","doi":"10.1177/09514848251387042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) is increasingly identified as a priority in healthcare organizations and an essential component of high-quality care. However, research on advancing EDI in healthcare workplaces is limited. This study sought to elucidate how to advance inclusive excellence in a clinical department of a comprehensive cancer centre. A mixed-methods quality improvement project was undertaken whereby staff completed an online survey, and a sub-group were interviewed. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics and univariate regression analyses and qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. 103 of 219 staff/learners completed the survey and 17 staff were interviewed. Over 90% of survey participants agreed EDI should be a priority and 29% had experienced discrimination, which was associated with considering leaving the organization. Facilitators to EDI were: enthusiasm/awareness of EDI, openness to new ideas, gender diversity, and safe environments for self-expression. Barriers to EDI were lack of: EDI knowledge, cohesion/collaboration, psychological safety, diversity along various dimensions, EDI-related communication, and burnout. To advance departmental EDI, initiatives should leverage facilitators and overcome barriers to meet department needs aligning with organizational goals. These findings will inform the development of a story huddle learning series to strengthen EDI-related knowledge and skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":" ","pages":"66-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848251387042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) is increasingly identified as a priority in healthcare organizations and an essential component of high-quality care. However, research on advancing EDI in healthcare workplaces is limited. This study sought to elucidate how to advance inclusive excellence in a clinical department of a comprehensive cancer centre. A mixed-methods quality improvement project was undertaken whereby staff completed an online survey, and a sub-group were interviewed. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics and univariate regression analyses and qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. 103 of 219 staff/learners completed the survey and 17 staff were interviewed. Over 90% of survey participants agreed EDI should be a priority and 29% had experienced discrimination, which was associated with considering leaving the organization. Facilitators to EDI were: enthusiasm/awareness of EDI, openness to new ideas, gender diversity, and safe environments for self-expression. Barriers to EDI were lack of: EDI knowledge, cohesion/collaboration, psychological safety, diversity along various dimensions, EDI-related communication, and burnout. To advance departmental EDI, initiatives should leverage facilitators and overcome barriers to meet department needs aligning with organizational goals. These findings will inform the development of a story huddle learning series to strengthen EDI-related knowledge and skills.

在多学科医疗保健环境中检查医疗保健人员对公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)的看法和经验:需要对混合方法进行评估,以促进包容性卓越。
公平性、多样性和包容性(EDI)日益被确定为医疗保健组织的优先事项,也是高质量护理的重要组成部分。然而,在医疗工作场所推进EDI的研究是有限的。本研究旨在阐明如何在综合性癌症中心的临床科室推进包容性卓越。开展了一项混合方法的质量改进项目,工作人员完成了一项在线调查,并对一个小组进行了访谈。定量数据采用描述性统计和单变量回归分析,定性数据采用专题分析。219名员工/学习者中有103人完成了调查,17名员工接受了采访。超过90%的调查参与者同意EDI应该是优先考虑的,29%的人经历过歧视,这与考虑离开组织有关。促进EDI的因素是:对EDI的热情/意识、对新思想的开放、性别多样性和自我表达的安全环境。EDI的障碍是缺乏EDI知识、凝聚力/协作、心理安全、各维度的多样性、与EDI相关的沟通和倦怠。为了推进部门EDI,计划应该利用促进器并克服障碍,以满足与组织目标一致的部门需求。这些发现将为故事团学习系列的开发提供信息,以加强与电子数据分析相关的知识和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书