Evaluation of a brief didactics training for peer teachers of medical history taking.

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jonas Nagel, Christine Zelenak, Stella Fangauf, Corinna Seemann, Lena Bläsing, Holger Kappe, Iris Demmer, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
{"title":"Evaluation of a brief didactics training for peer teachers of medical history taking.","authors":"Jonas Nagel, Christine Zelenak, Stella Fangauf, Corinna Seemann, Lena Bläsing, Holger Kappe, Iris Demmer, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The practical training of communicative competences in medical education is staff-intensive. We evaluate a brief didactics training for peer teachers (advanced students instructing fellow students from lower course levels) intended to efficiently enhance their teaching skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 9-hour didactics training, N = 139 peer teachers were prepared for instructing practical medical history taking exercises in small groups of undergraduate medical students. We assessed the participants' satisfaction with the training, their subjective increase in didactic skills, and their evaluation of the peer teachers (compared to how the same students evaluated experienced lecturers).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants evaluated the training positively and reported an increase in key didactic skills immediately after the training (0.17 ≤ r ≤ 0.20) and after their first term of teaching (0.12 ≤ r ≤ 0.20). Before the introduction of the training, students had rated their peer teachers less favorably than their faculty lecturers, but this gap disappeared after the introduction of the training (contribution to learning success: d = -0.84; quality of feedback: d = -0.43). Peer teachers were also perceived to be more activating in teaching compared to faculty lecturers (d = 0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a brief didactics training, peer teachers can become effective instructors for practical exercises of medical history taking interviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The practical training of communicative competences in medical education is staff-intensive. We evaluate a brief didactics training for peer teachers (advanced students instructing fellow students from lower course levels) intended to efficiently enhance their teaching skills.

Methods: In a 9-hour didactics training, N = 139 peer teachers were prepared for instructing practical medical history taking exercises in small groups of undergraduate medical students. We assessed the participants' satisfaction with the training, their subjective increase in didactic skills, and their evaluation of the peer teachers (compared to how the same students evaluated experienced lecturers).

Results: Participants evaluated the training positively and reported an increase in key didactic skills immediately after the training (0.17 ≤ r ≤ 0.20) and after their first term of teaching (0.12 ≤ r ≤ 0.20). Before the introduction of the training, students had rated their peer teachers less favorably than their faculty lecturers, but this gap disappeared after the introduction of the training (contribution to learning success: d = -0.84; quality of feedback: d = -0.43). Peer teachers were also perceived to be more activating in teaching compared to faculty lecturers (d = 0.34).

Conclusions: With a brief didactics training, peer teachers can become effective instructors for practical exercises of medical history taking interviews.

对同辈医学史教师简短教学训练的评价。
目的:医学教育中交际能力的实训是教师密集型的。我们评估了一项针对同辈教师的简短教学培训,旨在有效地提高他们的教学技能。方法:在9小时的教学训练中,N = 准备了139名同伴教师,以小组形式指导医学本科生的实用病史练习。我们评估了参与者对培训的满意度,他们在教学技巧上的主观提高,以及他们对同行教师的评价(与这些学生对有经验的讲师的评价相比)。结果:参与者对培训进行了积极的评价,并在培训后立即(0.17 ≤ r ≤ 0.20)和第一学期教学后(0.12 ≤ r ≤ 0.20)报告了关键教学技能的提高。在引入培训之前,学生对同行教师的评价不如对教师讲师的评价,但在引入培训后,这种差距消失了(对学习成功的贡献:d = -0.84;反馈质量:d = -0.43)。与教师讲师相比,同伴教师也被认为在教学中更活跃(d = 0.34)。结论:通过简单的教学训练,同伴教师可以成为病史访谈实践练习的有效指导教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信