Association Between Donor-recipient Matchability, Access to Transplantation, and Posttransplant Outcomes.

IF 2.2 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-10-08 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001862
Rowena Lalji, Ryan Gately, Ross Francis, Wai Lim, Scott Campbell, Narelle Watson, Gary Torrens, Anna Francis, Germaine Wong, David W Johnson
{"title":"Association Between Donor-recipient Matchability, Access to Transplantation, and Posttransplant Outcomes.","authors":"Rowena Lalji, Ryan Gately, Ross Francis, Wai Lim, Scott Campbell, Narelle Watson, Gary Torrens, Anna Francis, Germaine Wong, David W Johnson","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, deceased donor kidney allocation algorithms prioritize HLA matching, potentially disadvantaging transplant candidates with less common HLA alleles. This study developed an Australian Matchability score (M-score) to assess access to transplantation and posttransplant outcomes based on HLA match probability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>M-scores were calculated by comparing all recipients and donors with complete HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (July 1, 2006-December 31, 2023). Multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze associations between M-score quartiles and time to transplantation as well as transplantation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HLA data from 14 836 recipients and 7708 donors were used to generate M-scores. Of these, 10 760 recipients had available waitlist data and were included in the models. M-scores were normally distributed with a mean ± SD of 11.4 ± 0.9. The proportion of non-European Australians increased significantly with each quartile (ie, more difficult to HLA match), Q1: 16%, Q2: 26%, Q3: 40% Q4: 60% (<i>P < </i>0.001). Compared with Q1, patients in Q4 were significantly less likely to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.60; <i>P < </i>0.001) had the highest risk of death-censored graft loss (aHR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.91; <i>P</i> = 0.05) and acute rejection (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.52; <i>P = </i>0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The M-score identifies transplant recipients with difficult-to-match HLA profiles. Higher M-scores were associated with a lower likelihood of transplantation and an increased risk of death-censored graft loss and acute rejection. These findings highlight significant inequities in the current HLA-based algorithm for deceased donor allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 11","pages":"e1862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, deceased donor kidney allocation algorithms prioritize HLA matching, potentially disadvantaging transplant candidates with less common HLA alleles. This study developed an Australian Matchability score (M-score) to assess access to transplantation and posttransplant outcomes based on HLA match probability.

Methods: M-scores were calculated by comparing all recipients and donors with complete HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (July 1, 2006-December 31, 2023). Multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze associations between M-score quartiles and time to transplantation as well as transplantation outcomes.

Results: HLA data from 14 836 recipients and 7708 donors were used to generate M-scores. Of these, 10 760 recipients had available waitlist data and were included in the models. M-scores were normally distributed with a mean ± SD of 11.4 ± 0.9. The proportion of non-European Australians increased significantly with each quartile (ie, more difficult to HLA match), Q1: 16%, Q2: 26%, Q3: 40% Q4: 60% (P < 0.001). Compared with Q1, patients in Q4 were significantly less likely to receive a deceased donor kidney transplant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.60; P < 0.001) had the highest risk of death-censored graft loss (aHR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.91; P = 0.05) and acute rejection (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.52; P = 0.002).

Conclusions: The M-score identifies transplant recipients with difficult-to-match HLA profiles. Higher M-scores were associated with a lower likelihood of transplantation and an increased risk of death-censored graft loss and acute rejection. These findings highlight significant inequities in the current HLA-based algorithm for deceased donor allocation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

供体-受体匹配、移植可及性和移植后预后之间的关系。
背景:在全球范围内,已故供者肾脏分配算法优先考虑HLA匹配,这可能对HLA等位基因较少的移植候选人不利。本研究开发了澳大利亚匹配评分(M-score)来评估基于HLA匹配概率的移植和移植后结果。方法:通过比较来自澳大利亚和新西兰透析和移植登记处(2006年7月1日- 2023年12月31日)的完整HLA-A、HLA-B和HLA-DR数据的所有受者和供者来计算m评分。采用多变量Cox回归分析m评分四分位数与移植时间以及移植结果之间的关系。结果:使用14836例受体和7708例供体的HLA数据生成m -评分。其中,10760名受助人有可用的候补名单数据,并被纳入模型。m -评分呈正态分布,平均±SD为11.4±0.9。非欧洲澳大利亚人的比例在每个四分位数中显著增加(即更难与HLA匹配),Q1: 16%, Q2: 26%, Q3: 40%, Q4: 60% (P 0.001)。与第一季度相比,第四季度患者接受已故供者肾移植的可能性明显降低(校正风险比[aHR] 0.56; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.52-0.60; P 0.001),死亡审查移植丢失(aHR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.91; P = 0.05)和急性排斥反应(aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.52; P = 0.002)的风险最高。结论:m -评分可识别HLA谱难以匹配的移植受者。较高的m评分与较低的移植可能性、死亡审查后的移植物损失和急性排斥反应的风险增加有关。这些发现突出了当前基于hla的已故供体分配算法的显著不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书