Sae-Yeon Won, Eva Herrmann, Anne Neumeister, Jonas Hagemeier, Daniel Dubinski, Alhalabi T Obada, Bedjan Behmanesh, Joshua D Bernstock, Thomas M Freiman, Olaf Lademann, Artem Rafaelian, Jens-Christian Schewe, Alexander Storch, Andreas W Unterberg, Johannes Walter, Matthias Wittstock, Nazife Dinc, Florian Gessler
{"title":"Infratentorial Pressure Monitoring in Cerebellar Stroke: Feasibility and Prognostic Utility.","authors":"Sae-Yeon Won, Eva Herrmann, Anne Neumeister, Jonas Hagemeier, Daniel Dubinski, Alhalabi T Obada, Bedjan Behmanesh, Joshua D Bernstock, Thomas M Freiman, Olaf Lademann, Artem Rafaelian, Jens-Christian Schewe, Alexander Storch, Andreas W Unterberg, Johannes Walter, Matthias Wittstock, Nazife Dinc, Florian Gessler","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02391-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although supratentorial intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring represents the current standard in neurocritical care, its validity for assessing infratentorial pathologies remains uncertain. This multicenter, prospective study aimd to (1) evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of infratentorial ICP monitoring in acute posterior fossa pathologies and (2) develop a prognostic model for functional outcomes based on infratentorial pressure dynamics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study across three tertiary neurovascular centers in Germany (2021-2024), enrolling 35 consecutive patients with cerebellar stroke requiring surgical decompression and external ventricular drainage. All participants underwent simultaneous supratentorial and infratentorial ICP monitoring for seven posteroperative days. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale at discharge and at six-month follow-up (FU). The primary end point was the comparison of ICP gradients between compartments; secondary analyses evaluated the association between infratentorial ICP and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean infratentorial ICP was significantly higher than the supratentorial ICP (11.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-13.3] vs. 8.8 mm Hg [95% CI 7.4-10.1], P < 0.001). Patients with unfavorable outcomes had significantly higher infratentorial ICP values compared with those with favorable outcomes at FU (13.1 mm Hg [95% CI 11.1-15.1] vs. 9.5 mm Hg [95% CI 6.8-12.1], P = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a novel scoring system-calculated as patient age (years) plus four times the mean infratentorial ICP (mm Hg)-as a significant predictor of unfavorable outcomes at both discharge and FU (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively), with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.88 and 0.89. A cutoff value of 115 was established to predicting unfavorable outcomes at FU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes that infratentorial ICP monitoring (1) reveals clinically significant pressure gradients undetctable by supratentorial measurement alone, (2) provides superior prognostic information compared with conventional monitoring, and (3) can be safely implemented with 94% technical success rate. These findings advocate for the integration of infratentorial ICP assessment into the neurocritical care paradigm for posterior fossa pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02391-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although supratentorial intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring represents the current standard in neurocritical care, its validity for assessing infratentorial pathologies remains uncertain. This multicenter, prospective study aimd to (1) evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of infratentorial ICP monitoring in acute posterior fossa pathologies and (2) develop a prognostic model for functional outcomes based on infratentorial pressure dynamics.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study across three tertiary neurovascular centers in Germany (2021-2024), enrolling 35 consecutive patients with cerebellar stroke requiring surgical decompression and external ventricular drainage. All participants underwent simultaneous supratentorial and infratentorial ICP monitoring for seven posteroperative days. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale at discharge and at six-month follow-up (FU). The primary end point was the comparison of ICP gradients between compartments; secondary analyses evaluated the association between infratentorial ICP and functional outcomes.
Results: The mean infratentorial ICP was significantly higher than the supratentorial ICP (11.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-13.3] vs. 8.8 mm Hg [95% CI 7.4-10.1], P < 0.001). Patients with unfavorable outcomes had significantly higher infratentorial ICP values compared with those with favorable outcomes at FU (13.1 mm Hg [95% CI 11.1-15.1] vs. 9.5 mm Hg [95% CI 6.8-12.1], P = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a novel scoring system-calculated as patient age (years) plus four times the mean infratentorial ICP (mm Hg)-as a significant predictor of unfavorable outcomes at both discharge and FU (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively), with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.88 and 0.89. A cutoff value of 115 was established to predicting unfavorable outcomes at FU.
Conclusions: This study establishes that infratentorial ICP monitoring (1) reveals clinically significant pressure gradients undetctable by supratentorial measurement alone, (2) provides superior prognostic information compared with conventional monitoring, and (3) can be safely implemented with 94% technical success rate. These findings advocate for the integration of infratentorial ICP assessment into the neurocritical care paradigm for posterior fossa pathologies.
背景:虽然幕上颅内压(ICP)监测是目前神经危重症护理的标准,但其评估幕下病变的有效性仍不确定。本多中心前瞻性研究旨在(1)评估幕下颅内压监测在急性后窝病变中的可行性和临床应用;(2)建立基于幕下颅内压动态的功能预后模型。方法:我们在德国的三个三级神经血管中心(2021-2024)进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,招募了35名需要手术减压和外脑室引流的连续小脑卒中患者。所有参与者术后7天同时进行幕上和幕下颅内压监测。出院时和6个月随访(FU)时使用改良Rankin量表评估功能结局。主要终点是室间ICP梯度的比较;二次分析评估了幕下ICP与功能预后之间的关系。结果:平均幕下ICP明显高于幕上ICP (11.9 mm Hg[95%可信区间(CI) 10.5-13.3] vs. 8.8 mm Hg[95%可信区间(CI) 7.4-10.1], P本研究确立了幕下ICP监测(1)显示单纯幕上测量无法检测到的具有临床意义的压力梯度,(2)与常规监测相比,提供了更好的预后信息,(3)可以安全地实施,技术成功率为94%。这些发现提倡将幕下颅内压评估纳入后窝病理的神经危重症护理范式。
期刊介绍:
Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.