Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: exclusion criteria for repair or ECMO?

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Michelle J Yang, Christian C Yost, Ryan J Carpenter, Anastasia M Kahn, Stephen J Fenton, Katie W Russell, Bradley A Yoder
{"title":"Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: exclusion criteria for repair or ECMO?","authors":"Michelle J Yang, Christian C Yost, Ryan J Carpenter, Anastasia M Kahn, Stephen J Fenton, Katie W Russell, Bradley A Yoder","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) approximates 30%. Both severe lung hypoplasia and other anomalies contribute to demise regardless of repair and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We report clinical and physiological parameters for CDH infants not offered repair or ECMO (NoR/ECMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center retrospective analysis of 364 CDH infants managed from 01/2003 - 12/2024. We analyzed reasonings to not offer repair or ECMO in 49 infants (13%) across two time epochs. We compared the outcomes of infants that did or did not meet 3 possible lethal lung hypoplasia criteria based on maximum SpO<sub>2</sub> and minimum paCO<sub>2</sub> in the first 24 hours of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concurrent anomalies (n=27, 55%), prematurity < 34 weeks gestation (n=17, 35%), and/or severe lung hypoplasia (n=15, 30%) were the most common reasons for NoR/ECMO; multiple reasons occurred in 19 (39%). There were no differences between epochs for NoR/ECMO. We assessed 3 combinations of highest SpO<sub>2</sub> and lowest paCO<sub>2</sub> in the first 24 hours of life on outcomes. Only 9/364 (2.5%) patients had both highest SpO<sub>2</sub> < 85% and lowest paCO<sub>2</sub> > 75 mmHg; none were offered ECMO or repair. Another 15 infants met one or the other criteria; 4 were offered ECMO and repair with no survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our center, severe concurrent anomalies, prematurity, and severe lung hypoplasia accounted for 90% of all CDH infants not offered repair or ECMO. Failure to achieve either SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥ 85% and/or paCO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 75 mmHg within the first 24 hours of life despite optimal medical management was uncommon but consistent with lethal lung hypoplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"162721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mortality in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) approximates 30%. Both severe lung hypoplasia and other anomalies contribute to demise regardless of repair and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We report clinical and physiological parameters for CDH infants not offered repair or ECMO (NoR/ECMO).

Methods: A single center retrospective analysis of 364 CDH infants managed from 01/2003 - 12/2024. We analyzed reasonings to not offer repair or ECMO in 49 infants (13%) across two time epochs. We compared the outcomes of infants that did or did not meet 3 possible lethal lung hypoplasia criteria based on maximum SpO2 and minimum paCO2 in the first 24 hours of life.

Results: Concurrent anomalies (n=27, 55%), prematurity < 34 weeks gestation (n=17, 35%), and/or severe lung hypoplasia (n=15, 30%) were the most common reasons for NoR/ECMO; multiple reasons occurred in 19 (39%). There were no differences between epochs for NoR/ECMO. We assessed 3 combinations of highest SpO2 and lowest paCO2 in the first 24 hours of life on outcomes. Only 9/364 (2.5%) patients had both highest SpO2 < 85% and lowest paCO2 > 75 mmHg; none were offered ECMO or repair. Another 15 infants met one or the other criteria; 4 were offered ECMO and repair with no survivors.

Conclusion: In our center, severe concurrent anomalies, prematurity, and severe lung hypoplasia accounted for 90% of all CDH infants not offered repair or ECMO. Failure to achieve either SpO2 ≥ 85% and/or paCO2 ≤ 75 mmHg within the first 24 hours of life despite optimal medical management was uncommon but consistent with lethal lung hypoplasia.

先天性膈疝:修复或ECMO的排除标准?
背景:先天性膈疝(CDH)死亡率约为30%。严重的肺发育不全和其他异常都会导致死亡,无论是否进行修复和/或体外膜氧合(ECMO)。我们报告未进行修复或ECMO (NoR/ECMO)的CDH婴儿的临床和生理参数。方法:对2003年1月至2024年12月收治的364例CDH患儿进行单中心回顾性分析。我们分析了49名婴儿(13%)在两个时期不进行修复或ECMO的原因。我们根据出生后24小时最大SpO2和最小paCO2来比较符合或不符合3种可能致死性肺发育不全标准的婴儿的结局。结果:并发异常(n=27, 55%)、早产< 34周妊娠(n=17, 35%)和/或严重肺发育不全(n=15, 30%)是NoR/ECMO最常见的原因;多重原因19例(39%)。NoR/ECMO的不同时期无差异。我们评估了生命前24小时最高SpO2和最低paCO2的3种组合对预后的影响。只有9/364(2.5%)患者SpO2最高< 85%,paCO2最低bb0 < 75 mmHg;没有人接受体外膜肺栓塞或修复。另有15名婴儿符合其中一项标准;4例进行体外膜肺氧合和修复,无幸存者。结论:在我们中心,严重并发异常、早产和严重肺发育不全占所有CDH婴儿未进行修复或ECMO的90%。尽管进行了最佳的医疗管理,但在出生后24小时内未能达到SpO2≥85%和/或paCO2≤75 mmHg并不常见,但与致死性肺发育不全一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信