Hospice Use and Aggressive End-of-Life Care Among Cancer and Non-Cancer Decedents in Taiwan.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chun-Li Wang, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Chia-Yen Lin
{"title":"Hospice Use and Aggressive End-of-Life Care Among Cancer and Non-Cancer Decedents in Taiwan.","authors":"Chun-Li Wang, Chiann-Yi Hsu, Chia-Yen Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Palliative care has expanded to include non-cancer populations, yet disparities in hospice access and end-of-life (EOL) care quality between cancer and non-cancer patients remain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine 10-year trends and determinants of hospice use and aggressive EOL care among cancer and hospice-eligible non-cancer decedents in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 15,546 adult inpatients who died or were terminally discharged from a tertiary center between 2010 and 2019. Patients were classified as cancer or hospice-eligible non-cancer based on Taiwan's National Health Insurance criteria. Hospice enrollment and 15 indicators of aggressive EOL care were assessed within the last 28 days of life. Linear and logistic regression identified trends and predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospice utilization increased significantly over time in both cancer and non-cancer groups. For cancer decedents, hospice enrollment rose from 6.2% in 2010 to 52.3% in 2019 (β = 0.94, p<0.001) while non-cancer patients showed a more modest increase from 0.6% to 16.2% (β = 0.81, p<0.001). Non-cancer patients consistently exhibited higher aggressive-care scores (mean 5.2 vs. 3.6, p<0.001), particularly in ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, and CPR. Cancer diagnosis (aOR = 0.33), receipt of hospice care (aOR = 0.46), and self-signed DNR (aOR = 0.41) were independently associated with lower odds of receiving high-intensity EOL care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite improvement, non-cancer patients remain less likely to access hospice and more likely to receive aggressive treatments. Enhanced prognostic recognition and equitable palliative integration are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Palliative care has expanded to include non-cancer populations, yet disparities in hospice access and end-of-life (EOL) care quality between cancer and non-cancer patients remain.

Objectives: To examine 10-year trends and determinants of hospice use and aggressive EOL care among cancer and hospice-eligible non-cancer decedents in Taiwan.

Methods: This retrospective study included 15,546 adult inpatients who died or were terminally discharged from a tertiary center between 2010 and 2019. Patients were classified as cancer or hospice-eligible non-cancer based on Taiwan's National Health Insurance criteria. Hospice enrollment and 15 indicators of aggressive EOL care were assessed within the last 28 days of life. Linear and logistic regression identified trends and predictors.

Results: Hospice utilization increased significantly over time in both cancer and non-cancer groups. For cancer decedents, hospice enrollment rose from 6.2% in 2010 to 52.3% in 2019 (β = 0.94, p<0.001) while non-cancer patients showed a more modest increase from 0.6% to 16.2% (β = 0.81, p<0.001). Non-cancer patients consistently exhibited higher aggressive-care scores (mean 5.2 vs. 3.6, p<0.001), particularly in ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, and CPR. Cancer diagnosis (aOR = 0.33), receipt of hospice care (aOR = 0.46), and self-signed DNR (aOR = 0.41) were independently associated with lower odds of receiving high-intensity EOL care.

Conclusions: Despite improvement, non-cancer patients remain less likely to access hospice and more likely to receive aggressive treatments. Enhanced prognostic recognition and equitable palliative integration are needed.

台湾癌症与非癌症病患临终关怀之使用与积极临终关怀。
背景:姑息治疗已经扩展到包括非癌症人群,然而癌症和非癌症患者在临终关怀和临终关怀(EOL)质量方面仍然存在差异。目的:探讨台湾地区癌症及符合临终关怀条件的非癌症死者,其临终关怀使用及积极生命生命护理的10年趋势及决定因素。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2019年在三级医疗中心死亡或临终出院的15546名成年住院患者。根据台湾的国民健康保险标准,将患者分为癌症或符合临终关怀条件的非癌症。在生命的最后28天内评估临终关怀登记和15项积极的EOL护理指标。线性和逻辑回归确定了趋势和预测因素。结果:随着时间的推移,癌症组和非癌症组的临终关怀使用率显著增加。对于癌症死者,安宁疗护的登记人数从2010年的6.2%上升到2019年的52.3% (β = 0.94)。结论:尽管有所改善,但非癌症患者仍然不太可能获得安宁疗护,更有可能接受积极的治疗。需要加强预后识别和公平的姑息治疗整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信