{"title":"Effect of drug-coated balloon in patients with severe vertebral artery origin stenosis: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jichang Luo, Changchun Jiang, Haibo Wang, Rixuan Peng, Tao Wang, Dong Kuai, Guobiao Liang, Feng Wang, Shouchun Wang, Chenghua Xu, Wenhuo Chen, Jianping Deng, Xingyue Hu, Shu Wan, Bing Li, Bo Yin, Yifeng Du, Guangsen Cheng, Jieqing Wan, Xingyu Chen, Yabing Wang, Liqun Jiao","doi":"10.1177/17474930251377055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is a common cause of posterior circulation ischemic events, and endovascular treatment serves as an alternative treatment. However, conventional endovascular treatment methods are related to high risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether the drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce restenosis risk of VAOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted from 6 January 2020 to 1 October 2023 in China. Symptomatic patients with severe VAOS were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either DCB or bare-metal stent (BMS) and followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of 12-month restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 179 patients were enrolled with 91 in the DCB group and 88 in the BMS group. No significant difference was observed in the rates of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days between the DCB and BMS groups (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (1.1%); P = 0.49). The 12-month restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DCB group compared to the BMS group (10/76 (13.2%) vs. 27/76 (35.5%); risk ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial demonstrated that DCB may reduce restenosis risk in symptomatic patients with severe VAOS compared to BMS.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03910166).</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251377055"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251377055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is a common cause of posterior circulation ischemic events, and endovascular treatment serves as an alternative treatment. However, conventional endovascular treatment methods are related to high risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether the drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce restenosis risk of VAOS.
Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted from 6 January 2020 to 1 October 2023 in China. Symptomatic patients with severe VAOS were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either DCB or bare-metal stent (BMS) and followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of 12-month restenosis.
Results: A total of 179 patients were enrolled with 91 in the DCB group and 88 in the BMS group. No significant difference was observed in the rates of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days between the DCB and BMS groups (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (1.1%); P = 0.49). The 12-month restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DCB group compared to the BMS group (10/76 (13.2%) vs. 27/76 (35.5%); risk ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.001).
Conclusion: This trial demonstrated that DCB may reduce restenosis risk in symptomatic patients with severe VAOS compared to BMS.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.