Effect of drug-coated balloon in patients with severe vertebral artery origin stenosis: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

IF 8.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jichang Luo, Changchun Jiang, Haibo Wang, Rixuan Peng, Tao Wang, Dong Kuai, Guobiao Liang, Feng Wang, Shouchun Wang, Chenghua Xu, Wenhuo Chen, Jianping Deng, Xingyue Hu, Shu Wan, Bing Li, Bo Yin, Yifeng Du, Guangsen Cheng, Jieqing Wan, Xingyu Chen, Yabing Wang, Liqun Jiao
{"title":"Effect of drug-coated balloon in patients with severe vertebral artery origin stenosis: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jichang Luo, Changchun Jiang, Haibo Wang, Rixuan Peng, Tao Wang, Dong Kuai, Guobiao Liang, Feng Wang, Shouchun Wang, Chenghua Xu, Wenhuo Chen, Jianping Deng, Xingyue Hu, Shu Wan, Bing Li, Bo Yin, Yifeng Du, Guangsen Cheng, Jieqing Wan, Xingyu Chen, Yabing Wang, Liqun Jiao","doi":"10.1177/17474930251377055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is a common cause of posterior circulation ischemic events, and endovascular treatment serves as an alternative treatment. However, conventional endovascular treatment methods are related to high risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether the drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce restenosis risk of VAOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted from 6 January 2020 to 1 October 2023 in China. Symptomatic patients with severe VAOS were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either DCB or bare-metal stent (BMS) and followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of 12-month restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 179 patients were enrolled with 91 in the DCB group and 88 in the BMS group. No significant difference was observed in the rates of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days between the DCB and BMS groups (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (1.1%); P = 0.49). The 12-month restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DCB group compared to the BMS group (10/76 (13.2%) vs. 27/76 (35.5%); risk ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial demonstrated that DCB may reduce restenosis risk in symptomatic patients with severe VAOS compared to BMS.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03910166).</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251377055"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251377055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is a common cause of posterior circulation ischemic events, and endovascular treatment serves as an alternative treatment. However, conventional endovascular treatment methods are related to high risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether the drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce restenosis risk of VAOS.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial conducted from 6 January 2020 to 1 October 2023 in China. Symptomatic patients with severe VAOS were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either DCB or bare-metal stent (BMS) and followed up for 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days post-procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of 12-month restenosis.

Results: A total of 179 patients were enrolled with 91 in the DCB group and 88 in the BMS group. No significant difference was observed in the rates of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death related to target vessel within 30 days between the DCB and BMS groups (0 (0.0%) vs. 1 (1.1%); P = 0.49). The 12-month restenosis rate was significantly lower in the DCB group compared to the BMS group (10/76 (13.2%) vs. 27/76 (35.5%); risk ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval = 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.001).

Conclusion: This trial demonstrated that DCB may reduce restenosis risk in symptomatic patients with severe VAOS compared to BMS.

Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT03910166).

药物包被球囊治疗严重椎动脉起源狭窄的疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验。
背景:椎动脉起源狭窄(VAOS)是后循环缺血事件的常见原因,血管内治疗是一种替代治疗方法。然而,传统的血管内治疗方法存在再狭窄的高风险。目前尚不清楚药物包被球囊(DCB)是否能降低VAOS再狭窄的风险。方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机试验,于2020年1月6日至2023年10月1日在中国进行。有症状的严重VAOS患者按1:1的比例随机分配DCB或裸金属支架(BMS),随访12个月。主要安全性终点是手术后30天内与靶血管相关的短暂性脑缺血发作、中风或死亡的发生率。主要疗效终点为12个月再狭窄率。结果:共纳入179例患者,其中DCB组91例,BMS组88例。DCB组和BMS组30天内与靶血管相关的短暂性脑缺血发作、卒中或死亡发生率无显著差异(0 (0.0%)vs. 1 (1.1%);p = 0.49)。DCB组12个月再狭窄率明显低于BMS组(10/76 (13.2%)vs. 27/76 (35.5%);风险比= 0.37;95%置信区间= 0.19 ~ 0.71;p = 0.001)。结论:该试验表明,与BMS相比,DCB可降低有症状的严重VAOS患者的再狭窄风险。注册:URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov(唯一标识:NCT03910166)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信