Impact of antibiotic post-prescription authorization in resource-limited emergency rooms and acute care units during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Natthanan Kingsuvangul, Witranut Boonchaikamonarkorn, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan
{"title":"Impact of antibiotic post-prescription authorization in resource-limited emergency rooms and acute care units during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Natthanan Kingsuvangul, Witranut Boonchaikamonarkorn, Pinyo Rattanaumpawan","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01363-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial overuse is a major problem in various healthcare settings, including emergency rooms (ERs) and acute care units (ACUs). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the post-prescription authorization (PPA) of antibiotics in these settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included ER and ACU patients at Siriraj Hospital. In August 2020, a PPA for piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and ertapenem was implemented. These antibiotics were unrestricted for the first 72 h; thereafter, infectious disease physician approval was required. Data from pre-implementation (July 2020) and post-implementation (September 2020) periods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and six patients were included in the study (103 patients each from the pre- and post-implementation periods). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding male sex (49.5% vs. 47.6%;p = 0.78) and age (67.63 ± 22.9 vs. 66.94 ± 17.4 years;p = 0.27). The respiratory tract was the most common infection site, and piperacillin/tazobactam was the most frequently first-prescribed antibiotic. Using too narrow-spectrum antibiotics was the most common reason for inappropriate antibiotic use. The day of therapy/outpatient-day of the target antibiotics was significantly lower in the post-implementation group (0.85 ± 0.41 vs. 0.72 ± 0.39;p = 0.02). Favorable clinical outcomes were significantly higher in the post-implementation group (42.7% vs. 62.1%;p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the positive impact of PPA in emergency settings, with a 15% reduction in antibiotic consumption and a 20% increase in favorable clinical outcomes. Future studies should evaluate PPA early in the course of treatment to identify the most effective interventions for improving the quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01363-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial overuse is a major problem in various healthcare settings, including emergency rooms (ERs) and acute care units (ACUs). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the post-prescription authorization (PPA) of antibiotics in these settings.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included ER and ACU patients at Siriraj Hospital. In August 2020, a PPA for piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and ertapenem was implemented. These antibiotics were unrestricted for the first 72 h; thereafter, infectious disease physician approval was required. Data from pre-implementation (July 2020) and post-implementation (September 2020) periods were compared.

Results: Two-hundred and six patients were included in the study (103 patients each from the pre- and post-implementation periods). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding male sex (49.5% vs. 47.6%;p = 0.78) and age (67.63 ± 22.9 vs. 66.94 ± 17.4 years;p = 0.27). The respiratory tract was the most common infection site, and piperacillin/tazobactam was the most frequently first-prescribed antibiotic. Using too narrow-spectrum antibiotics was the most common reason for inappropriate antibiotic use. The day of therapy/outpatient-day of the target antibiotics was significantly lower in the post-implementation group (0.85 ± 0.41 vs. 0.72 ± 0.39;p = 0.02). Favorable clinical outcomes were significantly higher in the post-implementation group (42.7% vs. 62.1%;p = 0.005).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the positive impact of PPA in emergency settings, with a 15% reduction in antibiotic consumption and a 20% increase in favorable clinical outcomes. Future studies should evaluate PPA early in the course of treatment to identify the most effective interventions for improving the quality of care.

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行期间资源有限的急诊室和急症监护室抗生素处方后授权的影响
背景:抗菌药物的过度使用是各种医疗机构的主要问题,包括急诊室(er)和急性护理单位(acu)。本研究旨在评估在这些情况下抗生素处方后授权(PPA)的影响。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入了Siriraj医院急诊和ACU患者。2020年8月,实施了哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、美罗培南、亚胺培南/西司他汀和厄他培南的PPA。这些抗生素在前72小时不受限制;此后,需要传染病医生的批准。对实施前(2020年7月)和实施后(2020年9月)的数据进行了比较。结果:226例患者被纳入研究(实施前和实施后各103例)。男性(49.5%比47.6%,p = 0.78)、年龄(67.63±22.9比66.94±17.4岁,p = 0.27)组间差异无统计学意义。呼吸道是最常见的感染部位,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦是最常用的第一处方抗生素。使用过窄谱抗生素是抗生素使用不当的最常见原因。实施后组目标抗生素的治疗日/门诊日显著低于实施后组(0.85±0.41∶0.72±0.39;p = 0.02)。实施后组的临床转归明显高于对照组(42.7% vs. 62.1%;p = 0.005)。结论:本研究证明了PPA在紧急情况下的积极影响,抗生素用量减少15%,良好的临床结果增加20%。未来的研究应在治疗过程的早期评估PPA,以确定改善护理质量的最有效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信