Developing a clinical decision tool to support paramedics when assessing and managing children with minor head injury.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alyesha Proctor, Mark D Lyttle, Sarah Voss, Jonathan Benger
{"title":"Developing a clinical decision tool to support paramedics when assessing and managing children with minor head injury.","authors":"Alyesha Proctor, Mark D Lyttle, Sarah Voss, Jonathan Benger","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01362-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head-injured children are commonly transported to the Emergency Department (ED) by ambulance. However, most of those conveyed are deemed non-serious and are discharged at triage. Hospital clinicians use clinical decision tools to support their assessment of head-injured children; however, this is generally to determine whether a computed tomography (CT) scan is indicated. Currently, there is no pre-hospital clinical decision tool designed to support paramedics when assessing and managing head-injured children at scene. The aim of this study was to determine consensus amongst experts and stakeholders to inform the development of a new tool to support paramedics in safely assessing and managing children with minor head injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consultation process using a modified online Delphi technique comprising two rounds and a consensus meeting was completed between September 2023 and January 2024. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess consensus, set a-priori at 67%. Free text survey responses arising from the Delphi were studied and concepts were developed. Data were analysed anonymously, and feedback was given after each round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An expert stakeholder group comprising 36 participants took part in Round One, and 34 participants in Round Two of the online Delphi. The participants included parents/grandparents/caregivers, paramedics, primary care clinicians, ED doctors, ED nurses and Paediatricians. Consensus was reached in 36 statements following Rounds One and Two. The remaining eight statements were discussed at a consensus meeting, which was attended by 12 stakeholders. Seven of the eight statements reached agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This Delphi study has established consensus amongst a group of experts and stakeholders on the content and format of a pre-hospital paediatric head injury clinical decision tool, designed for use by paramedics: PATCH (Pre-hospital Assessment Tool for Children with Head injury). Future research should include an evaluation of the acceptability and usability of PATCH by paramedics.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01362-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Head-injured children are commonly transported to the Emergency Department (ED) by ambulance. However, most of those conveyed are deemed non-serious and are discharged at triage. Hospital clinicians use clinical decision tools to support their assessment of head-injured children; however, this is generally to determine whether a computed tomography (CT) scan is indicated. Currently, there is no pre-hospital clinical decision tool designed to support paramedics when assessing and managing head-injured children at scene. The aim of this study was to determine consensus amongst experts and stakeholders to inform the development of a new tool to support paramedics in safely assessing and managing children with minor head injury.

Methods: A consultation process using a modified online Delphi technique comprising two rounds and a consensus meeting was completed between September 2023 and January 2024. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess consensus, set a-priori at 67%. Free text survey responses arising from the Delphi were studied and concepts were developed. Data were analysed anonymously, and feedback was given after each round.

Results: An expert stakeholder group comprising 36 participants took part in Round One, and 34 participants in Round Two of the online Delphi. The participants included parents/grandparents/caregivers, paramedics, primary care clinicians, ED doctors, ED nurses and Paediatricians. Consensus was reached in 36 statements following Rounds One and Two. The remaining eight statements were discussed at a consensus meeting, which was attended by 12 stakeholders. Seven of the eight statements reached agreement.

Conclusion: This Delphi study has established consensus amongst a group of experts and stakeholders on the content and format of a pre-hospital paediatric head injury clinical decision tool, designed for use by paramedics: PATCH (Pre-hospital Assessment Tool for Children with Head injury). Future research should include an evaluation of the acceptability and usability of PATCH by paramedics.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开发临床决策工具,以支持护理人员评估和管理轻度头部损伤儿童。
背景:头部受伤的儿童通常被救护车送往急诊室(ED)。然而,大多数被转移的人被认为不严重,并在分诊时出院。医院临床医生使用临床决策工具来支持他们对头部受伤儿童的评估;然而,这通常是为了确定是否需要进行计算机断层扫描(CT)。目前,还没有院前临床决策工具来支持护理人员在现场评估和处理头部受伤儿童。本研究的目的是确定专家和利益相关者之间的共识,以告知新工具的开发,以支持护理人员安全评估和管理轻度头部损伤的儿童。方法:在2023年9月至2024年1月期间,采用改进的在线德尔菲技术进行咨询过程,包括两轮和一次共识会议。5分李克特量表用于评估共识,先验设定为67%。研究了德尔菲调查中产生的自由文本调查反馈,并提出了相关概念。数据匿名分析,并在每一轮后给出反馈。结果:一个由36名参与者组成的专家利益相关者小组参加了第一轮,34名参与者参加了第二轮的在线德尔菲。参与者包括父母/祖父母/看护人、护理人员、初级保健临床医生、急诊科医生、急诊科护士和儿科医生。在第一轮和第二轮之后,36份声明达成了共识。其余8项声明在12个利益攸关方参加的协商一致会议上进行了讨论。8份声明中有7份达成了一致。结论:德尔菲研究在一组专家和利益相关者之间就院前儿科头部损伤临床决策工具的内容和格式达成了共识,该工具专为护理人员使用:PATCH(儿童头部损伤院前评估工具)。未来的研究应包括护理人员对PATCH的可接受性和可用性的评估。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信